Hmmm, annoying. I wonder if vettel could have been close to nico there; given usual gap to kimi, I think it was a possibility.
Real shame but I think he'll have some fun in the race, particularly if there's a safety car.
RAI made pretty big gains on last year's Q3 - 1.2s, but still not 2-3s. Too bad VET didn't get into Q3 to compare.Juzh wrote:Red bulls are 0.5s slower than last year, whereas merc has managed to gain a whole 0.5s. Good progress. Remember people talking about 2015 cars being 2-3s faster than 2014 lol.
Like for like - I.e. Kimi to kimi - Ferrari have improved over a second (1.2). Even fastest Ferrari to fastest Ferrari you're talking 0.8 improvement - but I still think Seb or fernando (we're he in this year's car) would have been faster.Juzh wrote:Red bulls are 0.5s slower than last year, whereas merc has managed to gain a whole 0.5s. Good progress. Remember people talking about 2015 cars being 2-3s faster than 2014 lol.
It was Pirelli who said they'd be 2-3 seconds quicker but didn't turn out to be the case. Merc were aiming to find a second from their engine so maybe none of the teams other than Ferrari have found the time that were expecting.Juzh wrote:Red bulls are 0.5s slower than last year, whereas merc has managed to gain a whole 0.5s. Good progress. Remember people talking about 2015 cars being 2-3s faster than 2014 lol.
Ferrari had lots of ground available to make up. Unlike merc for instance. Something I've been saying for ages now. Yet delusional people were still believing some magic will make up laptime out of thin air.Nathanael F1 wrote:RAI made pretty big gains on last year's Q3 - 1.2s, but still not 2-3s. Too bad VET didn't get into Q3 to compare.Juzh wrote:Red bulls are 0.5s slower than last year, whereas merc has managed to gain a whole 0.5s. Good progress. Remember people talking about 2015 cars being 2-3s faster than 2014 lol.
Because the Merc rumour said their fuel system would get them a second from the engine alone.Juzh wrote:Ferrari had lots of ground available to make up. Unlike merc for instance. Something I've been saying for ages now. Yet delusional people were still believing some magic will make up laptime out of thin air.Nathanael F1 wrote:RAI made pretty big gains on last year's Q3 - 1.2s, but still not 2-3s. Too bad VET didn't get into Q3 to compare.Juzh wrote:Red bulls are 0.5s slower than last year, whereas merc has managed to gain a whole 0.5s. Good progress. Remember people talking about 2015 cars being 2-3s faster than 2014 lol.
Interesting comment from Perez on sky, saying this year's car was 0.8s slower than last year's. Ricciardo has also been saying they're only now getting to 2014 levels and Williams initially said it took a long time to claw back the downforce lost because of nose regulation change.Juzh wrote:Ferrari had lots of ground available to make up. Unlike merc for instance. Something I've been saying for ages now. Yet delusional people were still believing some magic will make up laptime out of thin air.Nathanael F1 wrote:RAI made pretty big gains on last year's Q3 - 1.2s, but still not 2-3s. Too bad VET didn't get into Q3 to compare.Juzh wrote:Red bulls are 0.5s slower than last year, whereas merc has managed to gain a whole 0.5s. Good progress. Remember people talking about 2015 cars being 2-3s faster than 2014 lol.