Alternative engine configuration

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
Vortex Motio
Vortex Motio
4
Joined: 19 Feb 2014, 04:09

Possible Weight Savings: Alternative engine configuration

Post

wuzak wrote:Dumping the MGUH is the most likely scenario to "simplify" the power units, while keeping the MGUK.

Without the MGUH they could then reduce the size of the ES from 4MJ to 2MJ. This would help reduce weight, as would leaving the MGUH off (~10kg for an MGU)...
Simplifying, and reducing costs are admirable goals, but would love to see weight reduction also.

How much weight would likely be saved if the size of the ES is reduced?

May there be other weight savings besides MGU-H & ES size, as a result of this cost reduction, simplifying exercise?

mrluke
mrluke
33
Joined: 22 Nov 2013, 20:31

Re: Alternative engine configuration

Post

If they remove the mgu-h its going to have a very big impact on laptime and available power as well as fuel used.

I would go as far as saying these PUs won't work if the mguh is removed.

NL_Fer
NL_Fer
82
Joined: 15 Jun 2014, 09:48

Re: Alternative engine configuration

Post

We already made some guesses a few pages ago, for the Fia Edclestone standard engine. The turbo is already recovering alot of energy, even without the mgu-h. Consumption will rise just a few % and deployment will be more like 15-16s