Of course.
I'm sure he should have been fighting with MAG and SAI easily
What did you mean by this? Ah, you meant the pace car engine was actually the slowest! I got it...Mclarensenna wrote: ↑01 Apr 2019, 01:11Renault so far is in shambles.
We had renault engine failure in race 1.
Now 2 engine failures in race 2.
Renault will have to turn down all the engines for the rest of the season as it seems they are running them way too hard currently.
To have the fastest unreliable engine is 1 thing. But to have the slowest or close to slowest with the worst reliability is next level failure!
They failed in Hulk qualifying with software issues..
Then in the race they picked the worst strategy for Ric keeping him out way too long instead. No other team tried this strategy just Renault decided it might work. Yet all the data showed it would not. Renault strategist the worst on the grid so far.
Renault is in shambles so far. Their customer Mclaren has produced a much better chassis as well. Renault is struggling everywhere. They need some serious changes at the top to how Renault is being run. Cyril has failed big time so far
What we have seen is Renault having issues with MGU-k and also Ferrari had 'some' issue in Australia and then again on LeClerc's car in Bahrain, Mclaren reported that Sainz's car had a gerbox issue that would have stopped him as well. But the pace in the car was good and i think Hulk would have qualified higher than Ricc. Yes reliability is bad. But id rather be quick and then we need to make the car reliable, than slow and steady and cruising round at the backdxpetrov wrote: ↑01 Apr 2019, 04:52What did you mean by this? Ah, you meant the pace car engine was actually the slowest! I got it...Mclarensenna wrote: ↑01 Apr 2019, 01:11Renault so far is in shambles.
We had renault engine failure in race 1.
Now 2 engine failures in race 2.
Renault will have to turn down all the engines for the rest of the season as it seems they are running them way too hard currently.
To have the fastest unreliable engine is 1 thing. But to have the slowest or close to slowest with the worst reliability is next level failure!
They failed in Hulk qualifying with software issues..
Then in the race they picked the worst strategy for Ric keeping him out way too long instead. No other team tried this strategy just Renault decided it might work. Yet all the data showed it would not. Renault strategist the worst on the grid so far.
Renault is in shambles so far. Their customer Mclaren has produced a much better chassis as well. Renault is struggling everywhere. They need some serious changes at the top to how Renault is being run. Cyril has failed big time so far
He likes to criticize Renaultdxpetrov wrote: ↑01 Apr 2019, 04:52What did you mean by this? Ah, you meant the pace car engine was actually the slowest! I got it...Mclarensenna wrote: ↑01 Apr 2019, 01:11Renault so far is in shambles.
We had renault engine failure in race 1.
Now 2 engine failures in race 2.
Renault will have to turn down all the engines for the rest of the season as it seems they are running them way too hard currently.
To have the fastest unreliable engine is 1 thing. But to have the slowest or close to slowest with the worst reliability is next level failure!
They failed in Hulk qualifying with software issues..
Then in the race they picked the worst strategy for Ric keeping him out way too long instead. No other team tried this strategy just Renault decided it might work. Yet all the data showed it would not. Renault strategist the worst on the grid so far.
Renault is in shambles so far. Their customer Mclaren has produced a much better chassis as well. Renault is struggling everywhere. They need some serious changes at the top to how Renault is being run. Cyril has failed big time so far
Agree with that...
Renault boss Cyril Abiteboul has criticised the "increasingly frustrating and unacceptable" engine problems that have blighted their start to the new season.
Drivers Nico Hulkenberg and Daniel Ricciardo retired at the same time with different issues three laps from the end of Sunday's race in Bahrain.
Both were set for points despite also having engine problems in qualifying.
"After a very intense winter, it has been a very bad start," Abiteboul said.
as writen in the article, they're MGU-K is a problem since the start of 2017, and it still hasn't been fixed, i wonder what they do at Renault.Jambier wrote: ↑01 Apr 2019, 14:43So... For once not finding excuses.
But what did he proposed then?
Maybe he is the problem.
Renault is fighting for P4 this year. That was 2018 goal.
In 2019 they should be fighting with Red Bull when possible and rest of the time be clear P4
Even with reliability it will not be the case, so many work to do again on the chassis.
I'm curious to see if this year they will bring good updates, both on chassis and engine because it was a weak point in both domains last year