monaco is certainly a drivers circuit.
That's worthy of 4 upvotes.xpensive wrote:I would have upvoted that one of course, unless the danger of you know what.
Anyway.
- And what bait did you use for this particular catch?
- Oh, but it was a big golden shiny one, can't tell you really, fisher's secret you know.
- Catch and release?
- Get the f*ck outa here!
Well said, cba responding to those debates no more.marcush. wrote:we had this before..If you don´t wan´t to see that Schumacher matches Rosberg in everything but points scored as a result of his car breaking down ...then so be it.
You certainly don´t drive the quickest laptime in Q3 Monaco without talent ,dedication and etc these days.There is no way you could count this towards a lucky moment for an old fart..
so.... you havent been watching f1 this year then.xDama wrote:What performance? He did some reasonable qualy's, but that's about it. Just compare every result of the last 3 years between the 2 of them and on every objective basis, Rosberg has been the better one for every year.zyphro wrote:"Miles ahead" in points- yes. In terms of peformance? I beg to differ. "Some bad luck"?
MSC has had some bad luck this year, but almost every driver in the current line-up has had his share of bad luck. Not to mention all the mistakes he's been making since his comeback. Last 2 races I've seen him crash twice in FP (in the wet, but he's supposed to be one of the best in the rain?) and what about the Hungary-start? Luck is something very trivial, but in the end you make your own luck. By crashing, stalling and whatever you're not creating any luck, but it's easy to say he's 'unlucky'.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not pro-Rosberg or anti-Schumacher, but I'm getting quite bored with all the excuses and etc. about MSC' poor performance and the comparison with what Rosberg is doing. MSC's not performing and any other driver would probably been sacked by now.
Leave it - it's been done to death pretty much everywhere (that isn't technical :p). Don't waste time discussing itfiohaa wrote:so.... you havent been watching f1 this year then.xDama wrote:What performance? He did some reasonable qualy's, but that's about it. Just compare every result of the last 3 years between the 2 of them and on every objective basis, Rosberg has been the better one for every year.zyphro wrote:"Miles ahead" in points- yes. In terms of peformance? I beg to differ. "Some bad luck"?
MSC has had some bad luck this year, but almost every driver in the current line-up has had his share of bad luck. Not to mention all the mistakes he's been making since his comeback. Last 2 races I've seen him crash twice in FP (in the wet, but he's supposed to be one of the best in the rain?) and what about the Hungary-start? Luck is something very trivial, but in the end you make your own luck. By crashing, stalling and whatever you're not creating any luck, but it's easy to say he's 'unlucky'.
Don't get me wrong, I'm not pro-Rosberg or anti-Schumacher, but I'm getting quite bored with all the excuses and etc. about MSC' poor performance and the comparison with what Rosberg is doing. MSC's not performing and any other driver would probably been sacked by now.
.bhallg2k wrote:Do any of you own a Mercedes-Benz? If so, do you regularly spend time beating the ever-living --- out of it with a sledgehammer?
I can also imagine the following exchange:
"Honey, does this make me look fat?"
"Yes, very much so. But, your mom was fat, and her mom was fat, and, by all accounts, her mom was fat, too. So, whatchagonnado?"
.
Reading this thread is another form of masochism as well, but I've contributed my share, not to mention the fact that I always click this thread first.bhallg2k wrote:Do any of you own a Mercedes-Benz? If so, do you regularly spend time beating the ever-living --- out of it with a sledgehammer?
I can also imagine the following exchange:
"Honey, does this make me look fat?"
"Yes, very much so. But, your mom was fat, and her mom was fat, and, by all accounts, her mom was fat, too. So, whatchagonnado?"
You call a 60 MUSD retirement fund in Switzerland nothing, do you Ball?bhallg2k wrote: ...
Nothing. Not a damn thing.
(This is fun.)
