Skippon wrote:No - it's a subtle way of saying we think we could all this seasons races - but may let another car win one, so it doesn't look so one sided in the record books!!!
That's not the reasoning. F1 won't stand for that kind of domination. They'll regulate it away if need be, as Seb must now be realizing. Either on track or off, F1
must be competitive, and it's in Mercedes best interest to keep it on track, keep their advantage, even if they sandbag, and carry that into next season and the season after. In previous seasons, they simply declared the early season innovations that led to such advantages as being illegal (McLaren 1998), but they can't do that this year with the engine freeze. So if things stay as they are, only Mercedes can make this season competitive so they can maintain their engineering advantage into next year. Being on top for one season doesn't achieve what Mercedes is spending all this money for (see 2009). They want to have the kind of run that Red Bull is (possibly) coming off of.
The real problem they face is the drivers championship. The drivers aren't going to take one for the team if the drivers championship is still in play between the teammates. Rosberg is increasingly putting himself in the #2 spot. Unless he starts outdriving Lewis on track, he's going to be the one taking the first bullet if the team does something.
I don't think they're actually worried about being caught either, not with 2+ seconds on the field when they need it.