I think there are hardware limits on the hybrid side and this blind spot in the ADUO measurement process means that instead of a trailing manufacturer getting a concession to catch up, the leading manufacturer (Mercedes), gets a second helping to get further ahead.gearboxtrouble wrote: ↑07 Jun 2026, 20:43I honestly don't think the car is bad. If they can be in the fight for pole while 8kg overweight in the last 3 races then they're definitely a win capable car. With the engine I can buy the theory that the peak performance of their ICE is better than the Mercedes. Massive kudos to the geniuses as RBPT for pulling off the most impressive debut for a new engine manufacturer in modern F1 history. I don't think they lack absolute performance on the battery or MGUK but it is likely their harvesting just isn't as consistent or good as the manufacturers who have the benefit of all the training data from running hybrids in F1 since 2014. That should be encouraging because it is likely that they could close the gap through the season via better maps and software alone.
ICE and Hybrid should have split measurement process and split development tokens. It's insane that Mercedes can develop another 2 homologations of an already class PU because Petronas has bad fuel in the ICE. One has nothing to do with the other. If their ICE is weak, allow them ICE upgrades only. The ADUO is a significant concession that pretty much opens up the entire PU for redevelopment whereas the year on year upgrades are more limited. There are things Red Bull will never be able to touch because they don't have ADUO, while Mercedes can practically build another PU when there's is already the best.
