2014 Turbos and driving style

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: 2014 Turbos and driving style

Post

The 2014 F1 turbos will almost certainly feature a twin scroll design.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: 2014 Turbos and driving style

Post

DaveKillens wrote:[...]

I expect the drive-ability of the 2014 cars to be exceptionally comfortable for the driver. But it all will come down to who manages to integrate all these technologies into a seamless and transparent package that delivers efficiency, appropriate power levels for the conditions (including rear tire wear), and good drive-ability for the driver.
That should be pretty straightforward given the flexibility afforded by the regulations to limit "power unit" torque at will.

5.5 Torque control :
5.5.1 The only means by which the driver may control acceleration torque to the driven wheels is via
a single chassis mounted foot (accelerator) pedal.
5.5.2 Designs which allow specific points along the accelerator pedal travel range to be identified by
the driver or assist him to hold a position are not permitted.
5.5.3 The minimum and maximum accelerator pedal travel positions must correspond to the
minimum and maximum available torque with the currently selected power unit torque map.


Torque map changes can be made with the simple press of a button.

User avatar
hollus
Moderator
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 01:21
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: 2014 Turbos and driving style

Post

If teams limit themselves to 12000RPM as is suggested due to efficiency reasons, that will be the end of hitting the limiter. When needed to pass, there would e 3000RPM available in the top gear. Maybe that will be a real push to pass button in the wheel, but a real one controlled by the driver at all times.
TANSTAAFL

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
650
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: 2014 Turbos and driving style

Post

IMO ......
passing would best be done by changing up rather than revving higher
most of the time there would be another gear available
as revs go beyond 10500 power would fall, no-one will be going anywhere near 15000 rpm
if efficiency is optimised at 10500 the power drop with higher rpm will be significant
if efficiency is compromised at 10500 (by using higher than optimal CR and ignition retardation) the power drop higher will be less
aren't we being told that the favoured injection won't make anywhere near 15000 ?

bhall
bhall
244
Joined: 28 Feb 2006, 21:26

Re: 2014 Turbos and driving style

Post

Tommy Cookers wrote:[...]
aren't we being told that the favoured injection won't make anywhere near 15000 ?
We're told many things. Whether or not those things are factual or have been interpreted correctly...

5.1.4 Fuel mass flow must not exceed 100kg/h.
5.1.5 Below 10500rpm the fuel mass flow must not exceed Q (kg/h) = 0.009 N(rpm)+ 5.

5.8 Fuel systems :
5.8.1 The pressure of the fuel supplied to the injectors may not exceed 500bar. Only those injectors
and fuel high pressure pumps specified by the FIA may be used.
5.8.2 Over 80% of the maximum permitted fuel flow rate, at least 75% of the fuel flow must be
injected directly into the cylinders.
There may only be one direct injector per cylinder and no injectors are permitted downstream
of the exhaust valves.
5.8.3 Homologated sensors must be fitted which directly measure the pressure, the temperature and
the flow of the fuel supplied to the injectors, these signals must be supplied to the FIA data
logger.

aussiegman
aussiegman
105
Joined: 07 Feb 2012, 07:16
Location: Sydney, Hong Kong & BVI

Re: 2014 Turbos and driving style

Post

raymondu999 wrote:I was just thinking back and brushing up on my Senna history - Senna used to kind of blip the throttle constantly to keep the turbo spooled; and to eliminate turbo lag. Would such a thing be possible/needed/beneficial with the 2014 turbos?
As short answer to this question is no it should not be required, but that might not stop some drivers doing it anyway. The blip was also for the gear changes as well.

The 2014 turbos will have an electric motor/generator within the CHRA with direct connection to the CHRA compressor/turbine shaft. At low RPM it will use the CHRA in “motor” mode and maintain or accelerate (spin/spool) the compressor up to speed or help it maintain a constant speed that is determined advantageous.

When the engine is not using all of the available energy the turbine is currently producing, rather than wastegating it, the CHRA will operate in “generator” mode using the excess energy (CHRA shaft torque) to generate electricity that can then be on sent to the new KERS type system (which is very different under 2014 regs).
WhiteBlue wrote:The 2014 F1 turbos will almost certainly feature a twin scroll design.
ABOLUTELY agree!! The required placement and advantages of Twin scroll make this an almost 100% certainty
pgfpro wrote:The BW EFR turbos are a break through in technology and I would of thought their would have been no lag at all.
I have run 4 of these on 2 different cars (EFR6258, EFR6758, EFR7064, ERF R&D unit) and I love them!!!
Image
Image
Image

Far superior to the Garrett GT and GTX series (I have run the GT2860RS, GT2871R, GT3071R and GTX2867R) and the EFR spool times as well as transient response is incredible and far superior!!!
Never approach a Bull from the front, a Horse from the back, or an Idiot from any direction

User avatar
pgfpro
75
Joined: 26 Dec 2011, 23:11
Location: Coeur d' Alene ID

Re: 2014 Turbos and driving style

Post

I have run 4 of these on 2 different cars (EFR6258, EFR6758, EFR7064, ERF R&D unit) and I love them!!!
Did you notice a major difference in blow by running the EFR's ?

BW quote
"Blow-by (the boost and
exhaust pressure gases entering the bearing housing) has been reduced
by 50% over the levels seen in prior generations of turbos".

I'm looking at doing a hill climb this year and have been running into major blow by due to my extreme ring gaps and PW clearances. Plus as you know the turbo is another cause of positive crank pressure.

Anyway the EFR turbos are a master piece when it comes to turbo's 8)
building the perfect beast

aussiegman
aussiegman
105
Joined: 07 Feb 2012, 07:16
Location: Sydney, Hong Kong & BVI

Re: 2014 Turbos and driving style

Post

pgfpro wrote:
I have run 4 of these on 2 different cars (EFR6258, EFR6758, EFR7064, ERF R&D unit) and I love them!!!
Did you notice a major difference in blow by running the EFR's ?

BW quote
"Blow-by (the boost and
exhaust pressure gases entering the bearing housing) has been reduced
by 50% over the levels seen in prior generations of turbos".

I'm looking at doing a hill climb this year and have been running into major blow by due to my extreme ring gaps and PW clearances. Plus as you know the turbo is another cause of positive crank pressure.

Anyway the EFR turbos are a master piece when it comes to turbo's 8)
We have always used an atmospheric venting oil/air separator for the crank case as well as using a dry sump system so we have never really had huge issues with high positive crank case pressures.

At the highest boost (2.0+bar) and highest RPM (9,000rpm) levels we run at the AFR's were very stable and we had no detonation from oil contamination etc. We recently had the head off to fit new cams and lifters and it all looked very good in there too with no serious carbon build up and not signs of detonation on the piston crowns.

That and we never blew the crankcase vent or the plug out of the old dipstick tube which we keep to allow us to easily get oil test samples without having to go to the boot and open up the oil tank.

We're running a Cosworth piston and ring pack with Darton liners and again we have had no real issues with blow by but the venting and dry sump system surely helped this.

That said the EFR's are IMHO 5 years ahead of anything else available to the mass market. In a side by side run on the same car, same fuel (E85) and same day of an EFR6758 and a GTX2876R the EFR was vastly superior to the GTX in spool threshold and transient response as well as had a much better torque curve.

EFR for the win!! :D =D>
Never approach a Bull from the front, a Horse from the back, or an Idiot from any direction

User avatar
ringo
240
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: 2014 Turbos and driving style

Post

What's the price difference with those 2?

And heaven knows how much money will be dumped into turbo development for the new engines.
For Sure!!

aussiegman
aussiegman
105
Joined: 07 Feb 2012, 07:16
Location: Sydney, Hong Kong & BVI

Re: 2014 Turbos and driving style

Post

ringo wrote:What's the price difference with those 2?.
IIRC they are pretty close. Both are around US$1,500 IIRC depending on exact spec's.
Never approach a Bull from the front, a Horse from the back, or an Idiot from any direction

User avatar
coaster
16
Joined: 30 Jun 2012, 05:10

Re: 2014 Turbos and driving style

Post


aussiegman
aussiegman
105
Joined: 07 Feb 2012, 07:16
Location: Sydney, Hong Kong & BVI

Re: 2014 Turbos and driving style

Post

Sorry took me a while to get back to this one... :)
pgfpro wrote:I was shock to hear that the Indy Turbo cars had some lag and the drivers were adjusting their driving skills to/for the change.

The BW EFR turbos are a break through in technology and I would of thought their would have been no lag at all.
As said I am currently running EFR turbo's, now five of them being the 6258, 6758, 7064, 7163 and a 8374. Whilst they are amazing and light years ahead of competitors, the turbine/compressor shaft will always have mass and as such require a certain amount of energy to get to operating. In the EFR's that threshold is just much lower than it was previously. Where the EFR's shine is you can run a physically smaller and also much lighter unit to reduce the operating threshold to a very low RPM number while also being able to flow greater volume of air. As an example the 6258 spools quicker and earlier than a Garrett GT2860RS, has better transient response but will also flow greater volumes over a larger Garrett GT2871R.
pgfpro wrote:Being a turbo guy myself I always wonder if the lag people think of today's is just the massive vertical torque increase when the turbo kicks in.
My EFR's have always provided very linear response. No "vertical torque increases". Below is a dyno graph of a 6258 on a 2.0Lt 4 cylinder runnign E85 only with different wategate spring pressures. The softer spring was blowing open so we moved to a stiffer spring.
Image

Again, no vertical torque rise. This is the 7163 on the same car. We ran out of injector (1100cc were too small) at 325kw at the front wheels so an estimated 375/380kw or 500hp at the flywheel from a dyno roll down. We are now running larger 2200cc injectors and 3 pumps.
Image

You really only get that sort of all or nothing torque from drag car/dyno queen engines which are all top end power or poor turbo choice for a circuit car. Give me "area under the curve" any day over a big head line number.
pgfpro wrote: I have install a few turbo kits on stock Honda engines and the customer will say wow I thought there wasn't going to be any lag. But what their feeling is just the change of the torque curve that has almost doubled. :wink: So when they blow a charge pipe coupler they realize how much more power and torque has been made from the turbo system and really there isn't any lag it was just slow before. :D

So with this all said I think the new F1 system will help with the hard hit from from the turbo and the MGU will be able to control this and make the car more drivable.
So considering the the old F1 and soon to come F1 turbos:

The old F1 turbo's were very crude in aerodynamic design, metallurgy and control systems. As a consequence they were typically very "peaky". Early wastegate controls were not from all reports reliable or very tunable. Compressor and turbine aero was poor by todays standards as well. This and the materials used which were typically heavier made the boost threshold and transient response typically poor when all combined.

Modern F1 turbo's will have much more advanced aero designs, metallury and faster more reliable control systems. Couple this with electrical assistance and it may see almost seamless boost delivery across the RPM range as there will be almost no operating range the turbo will not be able to operate in being driven by either the electrical unit or the exhaust gases.
Never approach a Bull from the front, a Horse from the back, or an Idiot from any direction

User avatar
strad
117
Joined: 02 Jan 2010, 01:57

Re: 2014 Turbos and driving style

Post

I thought they would run ceramic beaings???
To achieve anything, you must be prepared to dabble on the boundary of disaster.”
Sir Stirling Moss

aussiegman
aussiegman
105
Joined: 07 Feb 2012, 07:16
Location: Sydney, Hong Kong & BVI

Re: 2014 Turbos and driving style

Post

strad wrote:I thought they would run ceramic beaings???
They do. Dual Row Ceramic Ball Bearings with built-in oil control orifice. Why did you think otherwise?
Never approach a Bull from the front, a Horse from the back, or an Idiot from any direction

olefud
olefud
79
Joined: 13 Mar 2011, 00:10
Location: Boulder, Colorado USA

Re: 2014 Turbos and driving style

Post

aussiegman wrote: The old F1 turbo's were very crude in aerodynamic design, metallurgy and control systems. As a consequence they were typically very "peaky". Early wastegate controls were not from all reports reliable or very tunable. Compressor and turbine aero was poor by todays standards as well. This and the materials used which were typically heavier made the boost threshold and transient response typically poor when all combined.

Modern F1 turbo's will have much more advanced aero designs, metallury and faster more reliable control systems. Couple this with electrical assistance and it may see almost seamless boost delivery across the RPM range as there will be almost no operating range the turbo will not be able to operate in being driven by either the electrical unit or the exhaust gases.
My experience is limited to road turbos so I’m basing this on a deep reservoir of ignorance. But it would seem that the electrical assistance is the salient improvement with the quicker spooling making a worthwhile contribution. The old problem was the off throttle to full throttle response. Not only would the turbo have to spool up, but first the engine would have to generate some exhaust energy with the available low boost fuel charge -in essence spool up the engine and then the turbo- that resulted in a phase-lagging response to large throttle signals. Modulating power in small increments didn’t seem to be much of a problem.

With electrical assist it should be easy to maintain boost throughout throttle demands. Perhaps the challenge will be to do so without wasting electrical energy stores.