Here we have a driver (let's disregard the gender) who is married to a Williams investor. A driver that has no impressive track record whatsoever.
Then we have Frank Williams. The great Frank Williams who has apparently hired this driver for her development skills, stressing that aformentioned marriage had nothing to do with the appointment.
Out of all available drivers, Frank somehow chose this one.
I am just dissappointed that's all.
I know very well that pay drivers are part of the game and that almost every driver has paid his way up the ladder. Even the great ones have had to find a budget at one point in their careers, and there are great ones that never got there because of a lack of funds.
Perez, Maldonado, Senna - those guys bring a lot of cash to their teams. But they have achieved something in their careers. A race win here and there, maybe a championship.
In the old days we had a lot more of non-achieving pay drivers in F1. Lavaggi comes to mind, in the 90s. But he drove at Minardi, a team that was always struggling for cash. And that wasn't even nepotism.
This appointment of mediocre Susie Wolff by the great Frank Williams is just a sad thing. Bernie's quote on the whole thing puts it in a nice perspective: "If Susie is as quick in a car as she looks good out of a car then she will be a massive asset to any team."
Yeah. If is F1 spelled backwards, Bernie
