Everyone can accept that, however, the fact that the team made several mistakes (far too many when the car was up there) this year and couple that with the 'cheeky' tone the RE spoke in: you shouldn't be surprised to see such outrage amongst fans.FoxHound wrote: It seems you cannot accept Schumacher makes mistakes.
That would be more amusing then seeing him win a race after 6 years. +1snoop1050 wrote:schumacher has made half the mistakes the team has this year at best..
it seems the teams forget this aswell as the casual viewers.
next time michael has a failure he should ask "what happened there , what happened there" in a childish voice
atleast sauber can put a car together properly they just lack experienced drivers
This should be his last season. If he isn't screwing up, the team is screwing up. 
He hasn't brought home the points consistently. The team needs stability and a clean path to the future with a couple of young and hungry talents behind the wheel. [-o<
How did you come to that conclusion? Shumi made a mistake because he was overdriving a shitty car. The later claim about investigating the reason sounded like an excuse. So what? He has a viable excuse(a shitty car). Saying the team forced him to lie is a little too conspiratorial for me.ahmedvortex wrote:Pierce89 wrote:I'm a big Shumi fan too, but he did blame it on a mechanical problem(implied).ahmedvortex wrote: 3 . Vergne ( havenopoor 2012 ) , rear brake problem in fp 2 and fp3 , for Schumacher ,knowing his team members ability to solve problems., he was forced to lie ( like with previous big teams ) , he cant say i crashed my Mercedes amg , cause braking problem .
He was forced to lie to FIA , motorsport.nextgen-auto?com/Michael-Schumacher-issued-10-place-grid-penalty-for-Japanese-GP,49259.html
OppositeLock wrote:Schumacher is a diminishing asset that is still making rookie mistakes despite his experience.
very very good - i like very muchsnoop1050 wrote:OppositeLock wrote:Schumacher is a diminishing asset that is still making rookie mistakes despite his experience.
made this before the weekend for another forum
when both cars finished the race who finished higher and more conistently?
now lets take into acount the majority of those non finishs for msc are the teams fault-mechanical error
seems hes pretty consistent to me, consistently 3 places higher than rosberg given a car that can last a race...
and yet people like that minardi idiot think the team should have 2 rosbergs?
get rid of them both if they get rid of msc based on performance and get 2 drivers who are at a skill level between msc and rosberg.
we all know over driving a car leads to errors look at hamiltons season when he had a poop box of a car almost every race a crash/collision with someone
schumifan wrote:very very good - i like very muchsnoop1050 wrote:OppositeLock wrote:Schumacher is a diminishing asset that is still making rookie mistakes despite his experience.
made this before the weekend for another forum
when both cars finished the race who finished higher and more conistently?
now lets take into acount the majority of those non finishs for msc are the teams fault-mechanical error
seems hes pretty consistent to me, consistently 3 places higher than rosberg given a car that can last a race...
and yet people like that minardi idiot think the team should have 2 rosbergs?
get rid of them both if they get rid of msc based on performance and get 2 drivers who are at a skill level between msc and rosberg.
we all know over driving a car leads to errors look at hamiltons season when he had a poop box of a car almost every race a crash/collision with someone
thought this was a positive and pleasant read
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2012/r ... d-Prix.ap/
this article just enhances what you are saying by the way
The chart isn't his; it is copied from F1fanatics where you can find statistics per driver. So that's not a case of bias. However, I find it very insulting towards Keith Collantine that he claimed it as his own. He did NOT made this:OppositeLock wrote: Are you so biased that you can't even bother to put Rosberg's name on your chart? You try to explain away Schumacher's mistakes with the excuse of over driving the car. Both drivers are struggling to understand the car. Only one driver seems capable of moving the team up in the standings and increasing their share of the millions in constructor's prize money. Two Rosbergs would make good business sense. The team needs the money to improve the car. Schumacher needs to up his game. He has ruined his chances at two of his favourite circuits; Monaco and Suzuka.
man all the people here think you're crazy. This year Michael ruin everything (team; races ; points ...) Maybe he should go to HRT or Caterham and there nobody will ask him for results and can enjoy races.OppositeLock wrote: Are you so biased that you can't even bother to put Rosberg's name on your chart? You try to explain away Schumacher's mistakes with the excuse of over driving the car. Both drivers are struggling to understand the car. Only one driver seems capable of moving the team up in the standings and increasing their share of the millions in constructor's prize money. Two Rosbergs would make good business sense. The team needs the money to improve the car. Schumacher needs to up his game. He has ruined his chances at two of his favourite circuits; Monaco and Suzuka.
tell keith to sue me for copyright please lets see if it even gets to court seeing as the information contained in the image belongs to formula oneturbof1 wrote:The chart isn't his; it is copied from F1fanatics where you can find statistics per driver. So that's not a case of bias. However, I find it very insulting towards Keith Collantine that he claimed it as his own. He did NOT made this:OppositeLock wrote: Are you so biased that you can't even bother to put Rosberg's name on your chart? You try to explain away Schumacher's mistakes with the excuse of over driving the car. Both drivers are struggling to understand the car. Only one driver seems capable of moving the team up in the standings and increasing their share of the millions in constructor's prize money. Two Rosbergs would make good business sense. The team needs the money to improve the car. Schumacher needs to up his game. He has ruined his chances at two of his favourite circuits; Monaco and Suzuka.
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/statistics/2 ... chumacher/
It's not that. Information can and will be copied throughout the internet, that's not the problem. The problem is you show some decency by not claiming it as your own ("made this before the weekend for another forum"), which you clearly didn't show. Yes you can get that information anywhere, and it's not difficult to make that table yourself, but you still claimed something as your own while the person who really made it did the effort, not you.snoop1050 wrote:tell keith to sue me for copyright please lets see if it even gets to court seeing as the information contained in the image belongs to formula oneturbof1 wrote:The chart isn't his; it is copied from F1fanatics where you can find statistics per driver. So that's not a case of bias. However, I find it very insulting towards Keith Collantine that he claimed it as his own. He did NOT made this:OppositeLock wrote: Are you so biased that you can't even bother to put Rosberg's name on your chart? You try to explain away Schumacher's mistakes with the excuse of over driving the car. Both drivers are struggling to understand the car. Only one driver seems capable of moving the team up in the standings and increasing their share of the millions in constructor's prize money. Two Rosbergs would make good business sense. The team needs the money to improve the car. Schumacher needs to up his game. He has ruined his chances at two of his favourite circuits; Monaco and Suzuka.
http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/statistics/2 ... chumacher/
