To be fair Imola was just the first race in Europe, hence the plan for first major upgrade.Waz wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 12:11Have to agree with this. It really seems overlooked that track conditions and characteristics were always going to favour Red Bull, plus Max is very good at Imola.avantman wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 11:15Tsunoda 1:10s behind Verstappen after lap 44. Extremely lucky with the SC, otherwise he would've been lapped long before the chequered flag. More than 1,5s a lap slower on average. Compare this with the Mclarens. The ease with which they were overtaking cars, sometimes in the middle of the straights. Yeah, red bull was 'definitely' the fastest car in Imola, right.
(yes, I know tsunoda had old front wing and was in traffic)
It was actually a master stroke by Horner to plan for the update package to be introduced at Imola. Even if it made zero difference, it would still more likely be a good weekend for them. And the Red Bull board appears to know less about F1 than the average fan on Twitter
Well, in the first stint Piastri wasn't batteling for position, he was trying to hold on to Max. If he had a faster car he would have just sit back and attack in the closing stages op the stint or perform the undercut, similar to Jeddah. However, he lost too much time too early in the stint, so he just wasn't fast enough.avantman wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 08:54I read so much nonsense from so-called experts and analysts now declaring peremptorily that Red bull was the faster car than the Mclaren in Imola. Those so-called analysts forgot that Max V owned Bottas in Imola already in 2020 having incomparably and undoubtedly slower car. Bottas who was not much slower driver in 2020 than Piastri is now.
On both first two stints it was Mclaren driver who set the faster lap(Norris in the 1st stint, Piastri in the 2nd), despite driving extremely compromised stints, battling with other cars for position, driving in dirty air damaging the tires. So, Max opened up the gap to Piastri who had old tires after the safety car. Then Norris couldn't close that gap after overtaking Piastri, whilst it was clear he never even tried knowing he could do nothing having just few laps left in the race and those analysts say Red bull was the faster car. Nothing, literally nothing suggests red bull was the faster car on Sunday.
Imola is very bumpy. Verstappen asked Norris about his back post-race. There are entry curbs that you need to ride at tamburello and variante alta. Exit curbs are also aggressive and destabilizing. Track temperature was over 40C. Mclaren was the clear fastest car here last year.Waz wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 12:11Have to agree with this. It really seems overlooked that track conditions and characteristics were always going to favour Red Bull, plus Max is very good at Imola.avantman wrote: ↑19 May 2025, 11:15Tsunoda 1:10s behind Verstappen after lap 44. Extremely lucky with the SC, otherwise he would've been lapped long before the chequered flag. More than 1,5s a lap slower on average. Compare this with the Mclarens. The ease with which they were overtaking cars, sometimes in the middle of the straights. Yeah, red bull was 'definitely' the fastest car in Imola, right.
(yes, I know tsunoda had old front wing and was in traffic)
It was actually a master stroke by Horner to plan for the update package to be introduced at Imola. Even if it made zero difference, it would still more likely be a good weekend for them. And the Red Bull board appears to know less about F1 than the average fan on Twitter
Yes. I think we see at Merc and Ferrari the (pure) focus on 26. They are now dropping off with every update RedBull and McLaren can bring.
We have to be realistic. New PU will be the main limitation next year so it is more likely to be a "character building" year...