Pup wrote:Where does this 5 m/s figure come from? Sorry, I don't feel like trawling through 20 pages to find it.
Specifically:
1. Where did the number come from?
2. Is it real?
3. At what speed/rpm is this figure valid?
4. At what distance is it valid?
5. Is this figure specific to the RB8?
6. Is it different than last year's relative exhaust velocity? Specifically how so?
7. Why can't a small relative difference still be beneficial?
8. Why can't something that worked so well last year not work this year?
kilco316's calculation for exhaust flow velocity at the 18000 rpm, VE 125%, 200 C exhaust tip temp, 755 HP, 2.4 L, BSFC .5 is 84 m/s.
Car speed is 64 m/s, so I average the two flows to get 74 m/s shortly after the exhaust flow has left the tip. Based on s smikles sim observation that the exhaust losses velocity on its way to the, I reduced the 10 m/s gain by a conservative 50% to get 5 m/s. These numbers are a non specific to an make. Actually not concerned with specific flow other than the fact that they are 64 m/s when they meet the exhaust. I do not need make specific data to demonstrate the numbers.
There is no reason the exhaust tip velocity would be any different this year.
Of coarse very little tiny bit of improvement matters. But this years limited exhaust benefit might create more benefit blowing the wings, etc. as opposed to the diffuser edge.
Now it is time to show your calculations! What have you got?
Brian