Hehe, of course HAM was faster behind LEC!woocasz wrote: ↑20 Jul 2026, 15:35Lewis overtook Oscar on lap 9.Luscion wrote: ↑19 Jul 2026, 16:54Lewis challenged Charles during the first stint and was the fastest car on track during the second stint at one point, all with a bargeboard missing. People coming in the thread ever week no matter the result just to --- on a driver is so annoyingArtur Craft wrote: ↑19 Jul 2026, 16:46
finished 15s behind. Leclerc had much better pace again, just like in Silverstone. Lewis was lucky Max was holding Charles on the beginning. With clean air, Hamilton just fell behind. Idk if Hamilton had significant damage from the crash in which he destroyed Russell´s race but Leclerc also crashed into Piastri (should have been punished as well and both with more than 5s but FIA wants Ferrari in the championship...) and could have carried damage from that as well
Another tough weekend for Hamilton. He desperately needs to bounce back on the next GP which is one of his best tracks, otherwise it will get ominous for him
Charles was driving right behind Max the whole time and Max was holding him back.
Max pitted on lap 18.
VSC came out on lap 20; Charles, after just two laps in clear air, had opened up a 4-second lead over Lewis...
It’s the same situation as with Sainz: he was attacking Charles on the first few laps, suggesting he was faster, but after a few laps, as his tyres wore out more, his pace dropped like a stone.
second stint, at the end of the VSC:
Hamilton gap to Charles 12s
end of the race 15s
end of the disccussion...
He had huge slipstream, AND the boost mode!!
Every decent driver will be faster than their team mate just behind them, because of those 2 reasons.
I do not care who was actually faster, but in this case, HAM was only faster in those moments. Whenever he was a bit more behind, he was not. And hopefully this was exactly what Ferrari saw in the data, 10000x better than we.
