Ferrari F1-75

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
jacobianminkowski
jacobianminkowski
-1
Joined: 23 Feb 2019, 20:57

Re: Ferrari F1-75

Post

the rules are designed to mitigate stall. and if the plank is a problem they can switch to a lemans style round plank. but I don't think this is a serious problem for the new formula

santos
santos
11
Joined: 06 Nov 2014, 16:48

Re: Ferrari F1-75

Post

isn't that a problem on the track too? look at black marks on the track... it seems to be a bit bumpy.

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Ferrari F1-75

Post

godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 19:35
I'm starting to suspect the porpoising is due to their bow, both Aston and Ferrari have similar bows, with the fillet winglet on the sides.
Merc was reported to suffer from severe porpoising.

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Ferrari F1-75

Post

timbo wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 20:35
godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 19:35
I'm starting to suspect the porpoising is due to their bow, both Aston and Ferrari have similar bows, with the fillet winglet on the sides.
Merc was reported to suffer from severe porpoising.
Image

Severe separation in their bow, very detached flow, wouldn't surprise me to see that instability propagate down the floor.

Image

Wonder if McLaren with their more blunted edge bow suffers from pogoing.
Saishū kōnā

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Ferrari F1-75

Post

godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:05
Severe separation in their bow, very detached flow, wouldn't surprise me to see that instability propagate down the floor.
But is it really driven by the instability on the front? It may also be a choking diffuser in the rear.

mantikos
mantikos
35
Joined: 02 Mar 2011, 17:35

Re: Ferrari F1-75

Post

godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:05
timbo wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 20:35
godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 19:35
I'm starting to suspect the porpoising is due to their bow, both Aston and Ferrari have similar bows, with the fillet winglet on the sides.
Merc was reported to suffer from severe porpoising.
https://cdn-1.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... -w13-1.jpg

Severe separation in their bow, very detached flow, wouldn't surprise me to see that instability propagate down the floor.

They were studying the underside of the front wing, this is just overspray

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Ferrari F1-75

Post

timbo wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:15
godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:05
Severe separation in their bow, very detached flow, wouldn't surprise me to see that instability propagate down the floor.
But is it really driven by the instability on the front? It may also be a choking diffuser in the rear.
Aerodynamically speaking, choking means no more flow than what has been achieved, it doesn't mean flow stops. If choking happens it is either the throat or the inlet near the strake and bow. Those are the only places the flow can "choke" in the aerodynamic sense. Stalling is caused by flow separation and the resulting turbulence restoring atmospheric pressure.

The bow can certainly contribute to this instability because the strake the road and the bow form a duct.
Saishū kōnā

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Ferrari F1-75

Post

mantikos wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:21
godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:05
timbo wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 20:35

Merc was reported to suffer from severe porpoising.
https://cdn-1.motorsport.com/images/mgl ... -w13-1.jpg

Severe separation in their bow, very detached flow, wouldn't surprise me to see that instability propagate down the floor.

They were studying the underside of the front wing, this is just overspray
Ok.
Saishū kōnā

User avatar
SiLo
135
Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 19:09

Re: Ferrari F1-75

Post

godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:22
timbo wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:15
godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:05
Severe separation in their bow, very detached flow, wouldn't surprise me to see that instability propagate down the floor.
But is it really driven by the instability on the front? It may also be a choking diffuser in the rear.
Aerodynamically speaking, choking means no more flow than what has been achieved, it doesn't mean flow stops. If choking happens it is either the throat or the inlet near the strake and bow. Those are the only places the flow can "choke" in the aerodynamic sense. Stalling is caused by flow separation and the resulting turbulence restoring atmospheric pressure.

The bow can certainly contribute to this instability because the strake the road and the bow form a duct.
Is it possible to break up strong vortices if they are compressed into the floor?
Felipe Baby!

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Ferrari F1-75

Post

SiLo wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:31
godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:22
timbo wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:15

But is it really driven by the instability on the front? It may also be a choking diffuser in the rear.
Aerodynamically speaking, choking means no more flow than what has been achieved, it doesn't mean flow stops. If choking happens it is either the throat or the inlet near the strake and bow. Those are the only places the flow can "choke" in the aerodynamic sense. Stalling is caused by flow separation and the resulting turbulence restoring atmospheric pressure.

The bow can certainly contribute to this instability because the strake the road and the bow form a duct.
Is it possible to break up strong vortices if they are compressed into the floor?
Strong vortices break up on their own if the pressure differential is disturbed. Strong vortices need strong energy to create and propagate them. Smaller vortices require less energy to create and maintain.
Saishū kōnā

User avatar
SiLo
135
Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 19:09

Re: Ferrari F1-75

Post

godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:32
SiLo wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:31
godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:22


Aerodynamically speaking, choking means no more flow than what has been achieved, it doesn't mean flow stops. If choking happens it is either the throat or the inlet near the strake and bow. Those are the only places the flow can "choke" in the aerodynamic sense. Stalling is caused by flow separation and the resulting turbulence restoring atmospheric pressure.

The bow can certainly contribute to this instability because the strake the road and the bow form a duct.
Is it possible to break up strong vortices if they are compressed into the floor?
Strong vortices break up on their own if the pressure differential is disturbed. Strong vortices need strong energy to create and propagate them. Smaller vortices require less energy to create and maintain.
I assume as long as those smaller vortices are not forming to create a bigger one right?
Felipe Baby!

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Ferrari F1-75

Post

SiLo wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:35
godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:32
SiLo wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:31


Is it possible to break up strong vortices if they are compressed into the floor?
Strong vortices break up on their own if the pressure differential is disturbed. Strong vortices need strong energy to create and propagate them. Smaller vortices require less energy to create and maintain.
I assume as long as those smaller vortices are not forming to create a bigger one right?
Depends, it takes energy to create a vortex, there's no such thing as a free lunch, even if you're a good looking woman. If those smaller vortices helically braid each other they will eventually merge as long as the energy stream isn't interrupted. IE not too much flow separation/cross winds/turbulence.
Saishū kōnā

timbo
timbo
111
Joined: 22 Oct 2007, 10:14

Re: Ferrari F1-75

Post

godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:22
timbo wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:15
godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:05
Severe separation in their bow, very detached flow, wouldn't surprise me to see that instability propagate down the floor.
But is it really driven by the instability on the front? It may also be a choking diffuser in the rear.
Aerodynamically speaking, choking means no more flow than what has been achieved, it doesn't mean flow stops. If choking happens it is either the throat or the inlet near the strake and bow. Those are the only places the flow can "choke" in the aerodynamic sense. Stalling is caused by flow separation and the resulting turbulence restoring atmospheric pressure.

The bow can certainly contribute to this instability because the strake the road and the bow form a duct.
Well, of course, the surface which first meets the stream can contribute to what's happening downstream.
What I noticed is that in that video (with Leclerc) the car seemed to also change the pitch, so first, the rear dropped, then the car bounces back. So I think it was rear ride height which was critical.
I guess maybe they were experimenting with the rear drop trick, which was made famous by Merc last year, but Ferrari also did it. With the new aero formula, the car may not like it so much.

ryaan2904
ryaan2904
36
Joined: 01 Oct 2020, 09:45

Re: Ferrari F1-75

Post

godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 19:46
ryaan2904 wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 19:43
godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 19:35
I'm starting to suspect the porpoising is due to their bow, both Aston and Ferrari have similar bows, with the fillet winglet on the sides.

Like the song goes, rock-a-by baby, on the tree top, when the bow breaks, the cradle will rock.

https://i.imgur.com/f14vfXG.png

I believe the vortex shed by that winglet is breaking up and it has a cascade effect downstream.

Other teams with more bluff areas there seem to deal with it better.
Idk, I've been following closely and ferrari didn't seem to be having the problem yesterday and most of today. Only after lec made some suspension change did it become so apparent.
Also, Imo it's more to do with aero stall rather than some aero problem.
The plank area is still flat and can easily stall. If it does it will create turbulence and high pressure which has nowhere to go but the tunnels.
My bad, I mistook it for a wrong winglet.

I do remember Kyle engineering's vid say that it's curved inwards, towards the venturi channels and not the center floor tho.
CFD Eyes of Sauron

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: Ferrari F1-75

Post

timbo wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:44
godlameroso wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:22
timbo wrote:
24 Feb 2022, 21:15

But is it really driven by the instability on the front? It may also be a choking diffuser in the rear.
Aerodynamically speaking, choking means no more flow than what has been achieved, it doesn't mean flow stops. If choking happens it is either the throat or the inlet near the strake and bow. Those are the only places the flow can "choke" in the aerodynamic sense. Stalling is caused by flow separation and the resulting turbulence restoring atmospheric pressure.

The bow can certainly contribute to this instability because the strake the road and the bow form a duct.
Well, of course, the surface which first meets the stream can contribute to what's happening downstream.
What I noticed is that in that video (with Leclerc) the car seemed to also change the pitch, so first, the rear dropped, then the car bounces back. So I think it was rear ride height which was critical.
I guess maybe they were experimenting with the rear drop trick, which was made famous by Merc last year, but Ferrari also did it. With the new aero formula, the car may not like it so much.
Could be! But that's easy to tune out with bump stops.
Saishū kōnā