Monaco GP 2011 - Monte Carlo

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Monaco GP 2011 - Monte Carlo

Post

Brundle's take on Lewis's interview
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Axns_zKvamI[/youtube]
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

andartop
andartop
14
Joined: 08 Jun 2008, 22:01
Location: London, UK

Re: Monaco GP 2011 - Monte Carlo

Post

@ Ringo, check my previous reply to your post about Button.
The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. H.P.Lovecraft

ell66
ell66
2
Joined: 30 Jun 2010, 13:05

Re: Monaco GP 2011 - Monte Carlo

Post

and on lewis's incidents, it was his fault for making contact with massa, HOWEVER massa came out in front with no damage from lewis and got taken a couple of corners later fairly, massa had damaged his front wing against webber before hamilton and him touched, so why lewis got a penalty im not to sure.
the second one with pastor was a racing incident, look how early he turned in,just compare that to all the other cars.
these guys need to realise when to give it up, just like lewis did faily when schu got up the inside on lap 1.

oh and vettel fluked this one.

andartop
andartop
14
Joined: 08 Jun 2008, 22:01
Location: London, UK

Re: Monaco GP 2011 - Monte Carlo

Post

Another one for Lewis' collection...

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/91858
The most merciful thing in the world, I think, is the inability of the human mind to correlate all its contents. H.P.Lovecraft

User avatar
ringo
240
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Monaco GP 2011 - Monte Carlo

Post

andartop wrote:The Team had informed Button that Vettel's tires were about to go off the cliff in 2-3 laps, then the red flag came out. He was just waiting for the right moment. As opposed to crashing into everyone and collecting penalties...

Yes but it doesn't guarantee the race will run smooth till that happens. If Vettel's tyres went off he would still have to hound him for an overtake, and his tyres would be in advanced degredation as well.

He had chances, many chances. He ignored them and lost a win, just like in Monza last year.
For Sure!!

i70q7m7ghw
i70q7m7ghw
49
Joined: 12 Mar 2006, 00:27
Location: ...

Re: Monaco GP 2011 - Monte Carlo

Post

raymondu999 wrote:Brundle's take on Lewis's interview
[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Axns_zKvamI[/youtube]
No suprises there from the Red Bull-CC, which motorhome is that their at?

User avatar
Shrieker
13
Joined: 01 Mar 2010, 23:41

Re: Monaco GP 2011 - Monte Carlo

Post

andartop wrote:Another one for Lewis' collection...

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/91858
From now on, if you want someone to get a penalty, just invite for an overtake and turn onto them.

How cute.
Education is that which allows a nation free, independent, reputable life, and function as a high society; or it condemns it to captivity and poverty.
-Atatürk

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Monaco GP 2011 - Monte Carlo

Post

Diesel wrote:
wesley123 wrote:
Gerhard Berger wrote: Brakes stop the car. They don't make you slide into people. He hit Maldonado anyway so don't know how it would be "much worse".
Well, you cannot steer fully when on the brakes, so to stop enoguh you have to go pretty much forward. The space was not there to stop doing so so he would have hit.


Can you explain how the brakes are connected to the steering column?
If you don't understand how this works, you need to go try driving for a while – breaking and turning at the same time results in exactly one thing – locked wheels, and sliding sideways into a barrier.

i70q7m7ghw
i70q7m7ghw
49
Joined: 12 Mar 2006, 00:27
Location: ...

Re: Monaco GP 2011 - Monte Carlo

Post

beelsebob wrote:
Diesel wrote: Can you explain how the brakes are connected to the steering column?
If you don't understand how this works, you need to go try driving for a while – breaking and turning at the same time results in exactly one thing – locked wheels, and sliding sideways into a barrier.
That's what I explained here no?
Diesel wrote: It'll turn to full lock, just understeer like hell. I'm sure that's what he meant, he should just be clearer.
Last edited by i70q7m7ghw on 29 May 2011, 18:53, edited 2 times in total.

vall
vall
0
Joined: 04 Nov 2008, 21:31

Re: Monaco GP 2011 - Monte Carlo

Post

ell66 wrote:and on lewis's incidents, it was his fault for making contact with massa, HOWEVER massa came out in front with no damage from lewis and got taken a couple of corners later fairly, massa had damaged his front wing against webber before hamilton and him touched, so why lewis got a penalty im not to sure.
the second one with pastor was a racing incident, look how early he turned in,just compare that to all the other cars.
these guys need to realise when to give it up, just like lewis did faily when schu got up the inside on lap 1.

oh and vettel fluked this one.

What are you talking about? I saw parts falling off Massa's car

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Monaco GP 2011 - Monte Carlo

Post

Shrieker wrote:
andartop wrote:Another one for Lewis' collection...

http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/91858
From now on, if you want someone to get a penalty, just invite for an overtake and turn onto them.

How cute.
Christ, that's nuts. We'll see drivers deliberately turning in to take people out now.

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Monaco GP 2011 - Monte Carlo

Post

While that's the general consensus; if you actually looked; at some tracks; there are corners where all drivers brake+turn in. For example, Turkey T1, Abu DHabi T5 and T1
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

User avatar
HampusA
0
Joined: 16 Feb 2011, 14:49

Re: Monaco GP 2011 - Monte Carlo

Post

Fil wrote:HampusA, here mate, Martin Brundle will explain to you what you're complaining that Mark did (skip to 4m50).
It's an age-old racing tactic that is completely accepted & utilised in virtually every race.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sxg39qP ... be&t=4m50s[/youtube]

Webber hung Kobayashi out to dry, and forced him to miss the chicane. A completely legal maneuver.


If you can't accept this, i'm sorry. I have nothing more to add to this fruitless discussion.
This is simply not true. I know how overtaking works or what you can do. Hamilton was pretty good at it but what Webber did was not the same.

Why? Well he missed hís braking spot completely and almost ran out of road himself.
There is a big difference of forcing your opponent out of a corner then missing your braking spot and almost cause a carnage into a corner.
What Hamilton likes to do is force the opponent out of the corner. not miss his braking spot and force him to not even take the corner or stay on track.
Can´t believe people can´t see the difference between a good overtake and a very bad one.

If there would have been a concrete wall there your logics would all of a sudden change.
You can´t do what he did, i´m sure it wasn´t on purpose it just showed what a bad overtaker he really is.
Last edited by HampusA on 29 May 2011, 19:00, edited 2 times in total.
The truth will come out...

Formula None
Formula None
1
Joined: 17 Nov 2010, 05:23

Re: Monaco GP 2011 - Monte Carlo

Post

Hamilton should understand the importance of good qualifying at Monaco by now. If you qualify low, you will have to make many difficult passes to advance. You can't complain about this, it's the nature of the track. He should also know it is possible to do such overtaking without penalties. Alonso went from 24th to 6th at Monaco last year without colliding with anyone, for example.

lgmars
lgmars
0
Joined: 24 Mar 2011, 06:51

Re: Monaco GP 2011 - Monte Carlo

Post

myurr wrote:Vettel was beaten on track by Button. Even before his slow stop Button had closed the gap on his outlap to 19.9 seconds and took further time out of him on the next lap. The first safety car of the weekend eliminated his closest competitor from having a shot at all in the race, the second gave him track position back over Button, the third gave him a free pit stop just when his tyres were scheduled to disintegrate. Yes he drove a clean race with reasonable pace, but Vettel was incredibly lucky to win that race. Whilst we'll never know, had any one of those safety cars not happened then it would have been unlikely that he would have won.
Vettel pit just after Button, which is lap 16 vs. 15. Vettel lost 3.256s over Button in the pit. In lap 17, Vettel was just 4.139s behind Button which was after a full lap of working super soft vs. new soft, maybe 1.5s? I think it's reasonable to say that at the start of lap 16, when Vettel was exiting pit, he would have been 0.5s ahead of Button if RBR's crew had just kept up with McLaren's time.