It was just a quick stretch of the 2003 wing to the current width. If it had to be done right then the central control section should have been cropped.RicerDude wrote:That front wing looks huge for a 2004 car or is it just me?WilliamsF1 wrote:http://i1267.photobucket.com/albums/jj5 ... 9ff873.jpg
I guess it will be getting the air flow around the nose cone rather than under.
I was just trying to figure out what a narrow nose with wide wing would look like.
An RB3 would what I would consider a normal width of a nose, a brawn gp would be a wide nose.
![Image](http://cdn2.carsdata.net/pics/Red%20Bull/red-bull-rb3-03.jpg)
![Image](http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2009/03/butt_braw_melb_2009_q-5.jpg)
I dont think that we would see a nose as wide as the fw26 again, but it would be fun to see it.
I would really like to know what the difference is in raising the narrow nose to 150 mm from reference plain against running at at reference plain
![Image](http://www.photos-of-models.com/wp-content/uploads/Renault_R25_-Hot_Wheels_G9729_4_p.jpg)
![Image](http://www.f1fanatic.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/07/williams_fw16_goodwood_20111.jpg)