why cant we have f1 downforce on road cars

Breaking news, useful data or technical highlights or vehicles that are not meant to race. You can post commercial vehicle news or developments here.
Please post topics on racing variants in "other racing categories".
J.A.W.
J.A.W.
109
Joined: 01 Sep 2014, 05:10
Location: Altair IV.

Re: why cant we have f1 downforce on road cars

Post

Greg Locock wrote:With the exception of one contributor here (self proclaimed) very few people drive their road cars at anything like the limit around corners, deliberately. In fact I doubt many people regularly corner their car under control at 0.6g on public roads. So why on earth bother with all the downsides of a high downforce car when you'll never use it?

Let's see, you wander down to Supercar Bragging forum

"My car gets 1g of downforce at 100 mph"

"Cool"

"The ride's crap cos the springs are so hard, the tires wear out in no time at all, fuel economy (and hence range) is abysmal"

"Not so cool"

"...and of course the theoretical top speed and the 0-60 and 0-100 time are worse"

"You idiot why did you bother"


Not getting too old, are ya Greg?

Unless you have some realistic feel for the practicable operational limits of your machine, you may lose control..
..when faced with certain circumstances that while unexpected, might've otherwise been effectively dealt with..

& of course, we are discussing sporting enthusiast's machines, not basic A-B transport appliances..
& if the aero is 'active' - that is.. akin to 'sports mode' selector buttons for other ride/handling parameters, sure- why not?
"Well, we knocked the bastard off!"

Ed Hilary on being 1st to top Mt Everest,
(& 1st to do a surface traverse across Antarctica,
in good Kiwi style - riding a Massey Ferguson farm
tractor - with a few extemporised mod's to hack the task).

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: why cant we have f1 downforce on road cars

Post

Why can´t we have F1 downforce on road cars?

1- because of ride height, road cars need some clearance to pass through bumps, garage ramps, etc, so not even with same wings, floor, etc they´d get same downforce

2- because DF is effective from speeds not legal in 99% of the roads

3- because on those roads where you can go fast enough to get some downforce (highways), there´re no corners or they are so limited it´s not worth to setup the car for maybe 1% of the conditions it will find out there

4- because fuel economy is a lot more important for 99% of the users than passing corners at >1G

5- because to make the most of DF you need to go at speeds that, apart from ilegal, would be VERY dangerous on open roads since you can find on your same line a hole, my grandma driving really slow, or a traffic jam

OO7
OO7
171
Joined: 06 Apr 2010, 17:49

Re: why cant we have f1 downforce on road cars

Post

Andres125sx wrote:Why can´t we have F1 downforce on road cars?

1- because of ride height, road cars need some clearance to pass through bumps, garage ramps, etc, so not even with same wings, floor, etc they´d get same downforce
Active suspension as in the McLaren P1 road car can deal with this.
Andres125sx wrote: 2- because DF is effective from speeds not legal in 99% of the roads
Despite "speeds that are not legal in 99% of the roads", Bugatti decided to build a number of road cars capable of almost 270mph.
Andres125sx wrote: 3- because on those roads where you can go fast enough to get some downforce (highways), there´re no corners or they are so limited it´s not worth to setup the car for maybe 1% of the conditions it will find out there
Yet McLaren, Ferrari, Koenigsegg, Pagani and other high performance road car manufacturers employ active aero devices on their cars, as well as passive devices such as splitters, diffusers, tunnels etc.
Andres125sx wrote: 4- because fuel economy is a lot more important for 99% of the users than passing corners at >1G
I don't think Bugatti were so concerned with fuel economy when they designed the Veyron road car.
Andres125sx wrote: 5- because to make the most of DF you need to go at speeds that, apart from ilegal, would be VERY dangerous on open roads since you can find on your same line a hole, my grandma driving really slow, or a traffic jam
Why then do manufacturers create road cars capable of 230mph+.

Andres I agree with what you write when applied to everyday, standard road cars e.g Ford Focus, but I believe Erunanethiel was referring to high performance sports cars when the question was posed.

User avatar
The_table
0
Joined: 06 Oct 2014, 17:57

Re: why cant we have f1 downforce on road cars

Post

The mclaren p1's ultra low "race" setting is not road legal.

J.A.W.
J.A.W.
109
Joined: 01 Sep 2014, 05:10
Location: Altair IV.

Re: why cant we have f1 downforce on road cars

Post

Andres125sx wrote:


2- because DF is effective from speeds not legal in 99% of the roads

3- because on those roads where you can go fast enough to get some downforce (highways), there´re no corners or they are so limited it´s not worth to setup the car for maybe 1% of the conditions it will find out there

4- because fuel economy is a lot more important for 99% of the users than passing corners at >1G

5- because to make the most of DF you need to go at speeds that, apart from ilegal, would be VERY dangerous on open roads since you can find on your same line a hole, my grandma driving really slow, or a traffic jam


Check out this Porsche road car going fast on the freeway vid.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyWV1p0ZvoU

Look at the rear end getting loose @ ~55 seconds in, & later likewise being gapped by the bikes on high speed corners..
..sure the driver knew his machine, & controlled it, but perhaps a bit more downforce might've been handy there?
"Well, we knocked the bastard off!"

Ed Hilary on being 1st to top Mt Everest,
(& 1st to do a surface traverse across Antarctica,
in good Kiwi style - riding a Massey Ferguson farm
tractor - with a few extemporised mod's to hack the task).

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: why cant we have f1 downforce on road cars

Post

Blaze, first, any reason to write in bold?. Second, you missed one important point
Andres125sx wrote:Why can´t we have F1 downforce on road cars?
I know there are many cars trying to produce some downforce, but that´s irrelevant compared to F1 downforce. On F1 DF is higher than weight by a good margin, while no road car generate a half of its own weight, so I was just aswering the question set out by the OP

BTW, manufacturing a car wich is capable of 270mph has a simple target, manufacturing the fastest production car. It´s marketing.


edit: I must add a sixth point:

6- because front wings are a razor to cut legs, and production cars must be more or less safe for pedestrians.

Imagine if this run over you :o
Image

OO7
OO7
171
Joined: 06 Apr 2010, 17:49

Re: why cant we have f1 downforce on road cars

Post

The_table wrote:The mclaren p1's ultra low "race" setting is not road legal.
It doesn't need to be. The mere fact it has this capability (A driver can use it on track days) is all that matters. Similarly the Veyron can't really use its 270 mph speed on public roads, but it has the capability.

OO7
OO7
171
Joined: 06 Apr 2010, 17:49

Re: why cant we have f1 downforce on road cars

Post

Andres125sx wrote:Blaze, first, any reason to write in bold?. Second, you missed one important point
Andres125sx wrote:Why can´t we have F1 downforce on road cars?
I know there are many cars trying to produce some downforce, but that´s irrelevant compared to F1 downforce. On F1 DF is higher than weight by a good margin, while no road car generate a half of its own weight, so I was just aswering the question set out by the OP

BTW, manufacturing a car wich is capable of 270mph has a simple target, manufacturing the fastest production car. It´s marketing.


edit: I must add a sixth point:

6- because front wings are a razor to cut legs, and production cars must be more or less safe for pedestrians.

Imagine if this run over you :o
http://indianautosblog.com/wp-content/u ... 00x596.jpg
Andres, because I chose to answer your points individually with multiple quotes, I decided to bold my comments simply to make them more distinct from yours and easier to read, I meant no offence. Next time I could just use a different colour like blue. :)

Again I agree with you regarding your reference to F1 levels of downforce and I mentioned some of the possible compromises high performance road car manufacturers have to make.

I wouldn't call the Veyron a simple car to make. There are easier less refined ways of producing a 270mph road car, I agree. Gordon Murray initially rubbished the idea of the Veyron, stating it as a pointless exercise in road car development. He was very critical about the car until he actually drove it and became impressed.
Last edited by OO7 on 11 Dec 2015, 23:32, edited 3 times in total.

User avatar
Andres125sx
166
Joined: 13 Aug 2013, 10:15
Location: Madrid, Spain

Re: why cant we have f1 downforce on road cars

Post

Nevermind, it was just a comment :)

I said the target is simple (manufacturing the fastest production car), not manufacturing the car. That cannot be easy by any means.

Some time ago I watched a documentary about how they do it, and it´s really impressive. One thing that impressed me even more than the W16 engine, is the survival cell

The factory is asthonishing, looks like a operating room


Anycase, back on topic, a car capable of 270mph, even when that´s just a number to make the record since the tyres only last 60km at that speed :wtf: (and we criticize Pirelli? :mrgreen: ) , can be mindblowing at any speed. A 4WD 1000bhp car must be impressive even if you only use that power to accelerate to legal speeds.

But DF is different, at 75mph (120kmh) wich is the max speed on most countries, DF is useless, and only increase fuel consumption. Roads are not tracks, those were you can go faster are almost completely straight, with no corners. A production car with F1 DF is simply absurd. And that´s without considering it would never be legal due to pedestrian safety.

J.A.W.
J.A.W.
109
Joined: 01 Sep 2014, 05:10
Location: Altair IV.

Re: why cant we have f1 downforce on road cars

Post

Yeah, way back on page 2 of this thread - I noted the road going practicability issues of true aero downforce for cars..
"Well, we knocked the bastard off!"

Ed Hilary on being 1st to top Mt Everest,
(& 1st to do a surface traverse across Antarctica,
in good Kiwi style - riding a Massey Ferguson farm
tractor - with a few extemporised mod's to hack the task).

Edax
Edax
47
Joined: 08 Apr 2014, 22:47

Re: why cant we have f1 downforce on road cars

Post

Andres125sx wrote: 1.
2.
3.
4.
5
6 .
Image
Image

I guess all our arguments have just been ripped to shreds :lol:

User avatar
hollus
Moderator
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 01:21
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: why cant we have f1 downforce on road cars

Post

Is that a Trulli train? ;-)
Rivals, not enemies.

J.A.W.
J.A.W.
109
Joined: 01 Sep 2014, 05:10
Location: Altair IV.

Re: why cant we have f1 downforce on road cars

Post

Edax wrote: I guess all our arguments have just been ripped to shreds :lol:

L.O.L... Indeed..
I'll bet getting the 3rd degree from the cops every time you go out in those machines wears a tad thin..
& they appear very vulnerable to being run down in traffic, lacking even the positive virtues that bikes have therein..
"Well, we knocked the bastard off!"

Ed Hilary on being 1st to top Mt Everest,
(& 1st to do a surface traverse across Antarctica,
in good Kiwi style - riding a Massey Ferguson farm
tractor - with a few extemporised mod's to hack the task).

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
593
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: why cant we have f1 downforce on road cars

Post

J.A.W. wrote:
Check out this Porsche road car going fast on the freeway vid.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fyWV1p0ZvoU

Look at the rear end getting loose @ ~55 seconds in, & later likewise being gapped by the bikes on high speed corners..
..sure the driver knew his machine, & controlled it, but perhaps a bit more downforce might've been handy there?
1. That video is the perfect reason for the authorities to ban fast cars like that. Driven by idiots who think that other cars are there to be used as chicanes.
2. The car got unbalanced because the bike cut him up and he lifted to avoid collecting the bike. Lifting in a 911 with lock on is the perfect recipe for some "interesting moments".
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

Edax
Edax
47
Joined: 08 Apr 2014, 22:47

Re: why cant we have f1 downforce on road cars

Post

J.A.W. wrote:
Edax wrote: I guess all our arguments have just been ripped to shreds :lol:

L.O.L... Indeed..
I'll bet getting the 3rd degree from the cops every time you go out in those machines wears a tad thin..
& they appear very vulnerable to being run down in traffic, lacking even the positive virtues that bikes have therein..
Well its Russia if I'm not mistaken. So I doubt that it is even illegal.

anyuway here is the most vivid demonstration why F1 downforce is not really necessary on the street