You forgot Vegas.ScuderiaLeo wrote: ↑07 Sep 2025, 16:54Baku, Singapore, Austin maybe some luck will come our way. But we need luck to get there or the other teams making mistakes.
But i think best chance its Baku, Charles special track.
You forgot Vegas.ScuderiaLeo wrote: ↑07 Sep 2025, 16:54Baku, Singapore, Austin maybe some luck will come our way. But we need luck to get there or the other teams making mistakes.
I did forget Vegas. The drama last season was so bad I just erased the track from my brain!
ScuderiaLeo wrote: ↑07 Sep 2025, 18:07Yes lots.
Especially in the first stint they both had to lico for brakes.
But I don't know if it was only Ferrari or if other teams had to as well.
Thanks guys. But it has confused me even more. LiCo for brakes ? why ? in a track with large gaps between braking events and high speeds to provide good cooling. Doesn't make sense, unless they closed up the ducts too aggressively and kept the smallest mousehole as the inlet - I don't expect the team to get this wrong, that's too amateur a mistake.
This was lap 3 for Leclercvenkyhere wrote: ↑07 Sep 2025, 18:45
Thanks guys. But it has confused me even more. LiCo for brakes ? why ? in a track with large gaps between braking events and high speeds to provide good cooling. Doesn't make sense, unless they closed up the ducts too aggressively and kept the smallest mousehole as the inlet - I don't expect the team to get this wrong, that's too amateur a mistake.
Then again, LiCo from the start itself ? I can understand if it's for fuel, as there was no SC/VSC and aggressive underfuelling would have forced to LiCo towards the end of the race.
Then what was the LiCo for ? plankwear ? I thought they had already addressed ride height before Q (car looked 'higher' than others ; Piastri even commented in the cooldown room that Ferrari was a boat in the corners).
Utterly confused.
Car was 3rd force this weekend. Had they adopted the same wing load as Mercedes, they would have been 3rd as well, but without the chance of getting on top 3 on Saturday.
If the team doesn't "choke" the brakes so much to warm them up in qualifying, we will start in the bottom ten at best (just remember the pace in qualifying at the start of the season), and with the density of results in Monza qualifying, it would hardly be an exit from Q2. And all this for the sake of the plank, such compromises.venkyhere wrote: ↑07 Sep 2025, 18:45LiCo for brakes ? why ? in a track with large gaps between braking events and high speeds to provide good cooling. Doesn't make sense, unless they closed up the ducts too aggressively and kept the smallest mousehole as the inlet - I don't expect the team to get this wrong, that's too amateur a mistake.