[youtube]
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sO9aDoTRs0[/youtube]
Look at Webber's and the Torro Rosso's lines into Loews. That's the line which every driver normally takes.
Then look at Massa. He clearly changes his line and turns in early with no other intention than squeezing. He is entitled to defend yes, but not in a manner in which it's sure to cause contact.
Hamilton has put his front wheel past Massa's rear and is giving Massa three options.
1- Defend properly
2- Yield
3- Defend in a dirty manner which will cause collision
After putting his front wheel ahead of Massa's rear, there is no turning back for Hamilton and he has placed his trust in Massa that he'll compete in a fair manner. So the blame for collision is not Hamilton's. Yet he was penalized for "causing an avoidable collision".
The Stewards were WRONG.
------------------
andrew get out. You, YOURSELF claimed that the stewards were wrong for penalising Di Resta, but after Hamilton's incident with Massa you claimed just the opposite by saying "if Di Resta is penalised, then surely Lewis should be too".
If we go by that LOGIC of YOURS, if Di Resta's penalty is wrong, then surely the penalty handed to Lewis is wrong too.
You contradict with yourself and will go to any lengts to derogate one certain driver to serve
your ego.
