2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
User avatar
Big Tea
99
Joined: 24 Dec 2017, 20:57

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

A huge advantage is in compromises between engine and chassis/body. Customers get the compromise made between the engine department and car department of the supplier.
Only small things probably, but I bet they add up
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
341
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

Emag wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 11:29
Ground Effect wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 08:36
I honestly can't believe guys on here are minimising the technical advantage of a works team. Has it been narrowed over the years ? Yes, but in specific areas only. Same PU, same mappings, same software, same fuel etc. Why did McLaren suggest when they signed with Renault that they could possibly be involved in the direction of PU layout? Of course Renault downplayed this suggestion, because it would be giving away a considerable advantage.
Now, the power units are frozen, it's gonna be the same PU layout until 2026. That nullifies the packaging advantage because it gives customers time to adapt.
Adapt to what? Someone else's preferred PU layout for their preferred aero layout? :wtf:

They are not "adapting". They are being forced to compromise.

User avatar
JordanMugen
83
Joined: 17 Oct 2018, 13:36

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

Emag wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 11:29
So yeah, works teams still got an advantage. But I also disagree with the premise of RedBull being unable to win last year if they weren't a works team. They had such a dominant car that I don't really think the advantages they got for not being a customer team were critical.
I suppose. But the Renault engine was so unreliable in 2022, I don't see how Renault power in 2022 would have helped Red Bull's chances given Mercedes and Ferrari refuse to supply Red Bull. [Not that the Ferrari was that reliable either.]

I still disagree with McLaren's decision to move on from their excellent Renault relationship to a Mercedes relationship though. Alpine-Renault could certainly have used the extra data from having a partner team in 2021 & 2022, so it is a shame for Alpine.

[ On another note, it would be ironic if both Williams and McLaren are simultaneously Honda powered in 2026 -- exactly what didn't happen in 1988, thereby allowing McLaren such easy victories with Williams-Judd far out of contention! If only Honda had found a way to drop Lotus instead -- oh well Honda will be Honda and insist on "their" drivers, namely Piquet and Nakajima at the time. ]

User avatar
diffuser
223
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 04:40
too much stuff is being overlooked.

Look at the exhaust routing of the Mercedes PU. It has been designed for their aero package. Look at the compressor inlets. It has been designed for the W13 intercooler configuration. The engine tuning, the pressure waves in the intake system, it's all tuned around the Mercedes intake system.

What benefit is any of this to Mclaren? A power unit is not just some plug and play bit of kit. contrary to what others have said, they are not all "shaped the same" :? Why are people in denial? As if there is no tangible benefit in a game of splitting hairs.
Like I said McLaren have to supply their own exhaust. You don't get that with tge PU. You can route that anywhere you want within the performance requirements that Merc give you.

Same with the intercooler, it is a rad. McLaren supply their own. Plus alot of the other stuff you mention was set like that 4 or 5 years ago or more. It isn't stuff that changes year to year.

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
341
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

diffuser wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 15:10
AR3-GP wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 04:40
too much stuff is being overlooked.

Look at the exhaust routing of the Mercedes PU. It has been designed for their aero package. Look at the compressor inlets. It has been designed for the W13 intercooler configuration. The engine tuning, the pressure waves in the intake system, it's all tuned around the Mercedes intake system.

What benefit is any of this to Mclaren? A power unit is not just some plug and play bit of kit. contrary to what others have said, they are not all "shaped the same" :? Why are people in denial? As if there is no tangible benefit in a game of splitting hairs.
Like I said McLaren have to supply their own exhaust. You don't get that with tge PU. You can route that anywhere you want within the performance requirements that Merc give you.

Same with the intercooler, it is a rad. McLaren supply their own. Plus alot of the other stuff you mention was set like that 4 or 5 years ago or more. It isn't stuff that changes year to year.
Only the exhaust pipe behind the turbine is free. The exhaust system also includes the pipework between the cylinder head exhaust ports, and the turbine inlet. The medusa. That is what I'm referring to. This is defined by the manufacturer.

Also, I never said that Mercedes supply the intercooler or radiator.

This stuff is not trivial like you would like to believe. Mercedes already made the compromise between the power unit output level, it's geometry, and its cooling requirements. Location of oil pumps, fuel pumps, harnesses etc etc.

User avatar
diffuser
223
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 15:14
diffuser wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 15:10
AR3-GP wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 04:40
too much stuff is being overlooked.

Look at the exhaust routing of the Mercedes PU. It has been designed for their aero package. Look at the compressor inlets. It has been designed for the W13 intercooler configuration. The engine tuning, the pressure waves in the intake system, it's all tuned around the Mercedes intake system.

What benefit is any of this to Mclaren? A power unit is not just some plug and play bit of kit. contrary to what others have said, they are not all "shaped the same" :? Why are people in denial? As if there is no tangible benefit in a game of splitting hairs.
Like I said McLaren have to supply their own exhaust. You don't get that with tge PU. You can route that anywhere you want within the performance requirements that Merc give you.

Same with the intercooler, it is a rad. McLaren supply their own. Plus alot of the other stuff you mention was set like that 4 or 5 years ago or more. It isn't stuff that changes year to year.
Only the exhaust pipe behind the turbine is free. The exhaust system also includes the pipework between the cylinder head exhaust ports, and the turbine inlet. The medusa. That is what I'm referring to. This is defined by the manufacturer.

Also, I never said that Mercedes supply the intercooler or radiator.

This stuff is not trivial like you would like to believe. Mercedes already made the compromise between the power unit output level, it's geometry, and its cooling requirements. Location of oil pumps, fuel pumps, harnesses etc etc.
There are always compromises, even when you're the works. Generally the choices Merc made for themselves probably work for everyone else.
The other thing is, as apposed to 2021 aero, where it was tight up against the PU. The present aero leaves a ton of space between the skin and the PU.

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
341
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

diffuser wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 15:27
AR3-GP wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 15:14
diffuser wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 15:10


Like I said McLaren have to supply their own exhaust. You don't get that with tge PU. You can route that anywhere you want within the performance requirements that Merc give you.

Same with the intercooler, it is a rad. McLaren supply their own. Plus alot of the other stuff you mention was set like that 4 or 5 years ago or more. It isn't stuff that changes year to year.
Only the exhaust pipe behind the turbine is free. The exhaust system also includes the pipework between the cylinder head exhaust ports, and the turbine inlet. The medusa. That is what I'm referring to. This is defined by the manufacturer.

Also, I never said that Mercedes supply the intercooler or radiator.

This stuff is not trivial like you would like to believe. Mercedes already made the compromise between the power unit output level, it's geometry, and its cooling requirements. Location of oil pumps, fuel pumps, harnesses etc etc.
There are always compromises, even when you're the works. Generally the choices Merc made for themselves probably work for everyone else.
and 2022 is a ringing endorsement.

Henri
Henri
-6
Joined: 14 Jan 2022, 10:58

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

McLaren need to hire new aero people.. top 3 teams are levels above them in chassis and aero

genarro
genarro
0
Joined: 15 May 2019, 10:22

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

Henri wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 17:34
McLaren need to hire new aero people.. top 3 teams are levels above them in chassis and aero
Dont be daft mate

Maybe broaden their department yes.. But the people in the team are top notch... The infrastructure is where performance is lost.. We have heard many times that the old windtunnel has a blind spot and the other infrastructure as well... We will get there, just have a little patience.

User avatar
diffuser
223
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 15:44
diffuser wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 15:27
AR3-GP wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 15:14


Only the exhaust pipe behind the turbine is free. The exhaust system also includes the pipework between the cylinder head exhaust ports, and the turbine inlet. The medusa. That is what I'm referring to. This is defined by the manufacturer.

Also, I never said that Mercedes supply the intercooler or radiator.

This stuff is not trivial like you would like to believe. Mercedes already made the compromise between the power unit output level, it's geometry, and its cooling requirements. Location of oil pumps, fuel pumps, harnesses etc etc.
There are always compromises, even when you're the works. Generally the choices Merc made for themselves probably work for everyone else.
and 2022 is a ringing endorsement.

Right, Merc didn't win in 2022 cause of their PU. The same PU, cause of the freeze in PUs that started in 2021, that won the constructors in 2021.

User avatar
diffuser
223
Joined: 07 Sep 2012, 13:55
Location: Montreal

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

genarro wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 18:38
Henri wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 17:34
McLaren need to hire new aero people.. top 3 teams are levels above them in chassis and aero
Dont be daft mate

Maybe broaden their department yes.. But the people in the team are top notch... The infrastructure is where performance is lost.. We have heard many times that the old windtunnel has a blind spot and the other infrastructure as well... We will get there, just have a little patience.
Both scenarios are possible but I don't know how we can make more than a random guess from where we are.

Ground Effect
Ground Effect
14
Joined: 02 Mar 2018, 12:39

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

diffuser wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 19:13
AR3-GP wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 15:44
diffuser wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 15:27

There are always compromises, even when you're the works. Generally the choices Merc made for themselves probably work for everyone else.
and 2022 is a ringing endorsement.

Right, Merc didn't win in 2022 cause of their PU. The same PU, cause of the freeze in PUs that started in 2021, that won the constructors in 2021.
I thought the engine freeze took effect in 2022?
Q: (Stefano Mancini – La Stampa) Kimi, will you help Vettel to win his championship this year?
Kimi Raikkonen: I can only drive one car, obviously. 
@2018 Singapore Grand Prix drivers press conference.

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
341
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

diffuser wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 19:13
AR3-GP wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 15:44
diffuser wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 15:27

There are always compromises, even when you're the works. Generally the choices Merc made for themselves probably work for everyone else.
and 2022 is a ringing endorsement.

Right, Merc didn't win in 2022 cause of their PU. The same PU, cause of the freeze in PUs that started in 2021, that won the constructors in 2021.
I have no idea if you are correct or not but it should be noted that there was a fuel change before the 2022 season.

Anyway, my point was Mercedes packaged their PU for aerodynamic reasons, and 2022 was not a ringing endorsement of that endeavor.

Henri
Henri
-6
Joined: 14 Jan 2022, 10:58

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

genarro wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 18:38
Henri wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 17:34
McLaren need to hire new aero people.. top 3 teams are levels above them in chassis and aero
Dont be daft mate

Maybe broaden their department yes.. But the people in the team are top notch... The infrastructure is where performance is lost.. We have heard many times that the old windtunnel has a blind spot and the other infrastructure as well... We will get there, just have a little patience.
Nah.. red bull has a old wind tunnel but still better than McLaren.. the infrastructure excuse is old

PhillipM
PhillipM
385
Joined: 16 May 2011, 15:18
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: 2023 - McLaren Formula 1 Team

Post

Henri wrote:
12 Feb 2023, 20:15

Nah.. red bull has a old wind tunnel but still better than McLaren.. the infrastructure excuse is old
Red Bull has a wind tunnel on site, specifically setup for race cars, which has been updated yearly.

Stop trotting this nonsense out. RB has one of, if not *the* best, tunnels going.