Best times on medium from all 6 days.
Mercedes 1'24"329
Ferrari +0.282s
Red Bull +0.636s
Williams +0.822s
Force India +0.957s
Toro Rosso +0.971s
Renault +1.547s
Haas +2.332s
McLaren +2.504s
Sauber +2.511s
Manor +3.920s
Or may be something else as Sauber did that too, or just coincidence? - http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewto ... 15#p623451PlatinumZealot wrote:That side is the intercooler radior I think so they could be simulating a worst case scenario where inlet temps are too hot how the engine reacts.Mr.G wrote:For the tape - I think it's a bit distorted by the angle of the radiator and also the angle of the camera. I think we don't see quite a lot or the upper part of the radiator. For me it's not more than 50% covered, maybe less...
This is great, a wet race will be always better though wet in Malaysia means a red flag.Dann wrote:Only today I realized that Malaysian GP moved from March to Oct; first time ever. It will not be as hot as this month.
Previously, October has always been for MotoGP race. Expect wet race then.
I think it is almost imposible to estimate the difference between both teams because Ferrari is on an earlier stage of development of its car. I guess, anyway, that the gap will be greater in Melbourne but it will be reduced if this new design shows the potential that theoretically has.dot235 wrote:Where do you guys get all this info regarding 0.2-0.3sec to Mercedes? I would like to believe it, but I have no reason to do so.
http://www.f1today.net/en/news/f1/20927 ... -increased
Interesting. I thought it would look worse on the cars than it does. I really don't mind this.namao wrote:Cockpit 2017, from today.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ccm9FUYWAAAcus_.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ccm9HQmXIAANaBk.jpg
@AlbertFabrega
Yuck!!!namao wrote:Cockpit 2017, from today.
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ccm9FUYWAAAcus_.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ccm9HQmXIAANaBk.jpg
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Ccm_GNaXIAAqDdZ.jpg
@AlbertFabrega