Teams agree to cover up ugly noses for 2013

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
King Six
King Six
1
Joined: 27 May 2008, 16:52
Location: London, England

Re: Teams agree to cover up ugly noses for 2013

Post

Javert wrote:
WhiteBlue wrote:Modesty panel will be a one season solution anyway. From 2014 the noses will come down to 185 mm from 550 mm now and then the high nose design will be history, unless they change it last minute of course.
You called it :mrgreen:
I think that's partly why they had such a bizarre 'modesty panel' solution to the step noses, the fact that the rules were changing for 2014 anyway...so they didn't need to think of a 'proper' solution. I think they will mandate a better low nose for 2014, even if they have said the 2014 regulations will be the same as 2012 (or 2013).

Richard
Richard
Moderator
Joined: 15 Apr 2009, 14:41
Location: UK

Re: Teams agree to cover up ugly noses for 2013

Post

For info - there is discussion of the 2014 aero regs being the same as 2012 here :arrow: http://www.f1technical.net/forum/viewto ... ead#unread

User avatar
machin
162
Joined: 25 Nov 2008, 14:45

Re: Teams agree to cover up ugly noses for 2013

Post

I think the whole "modesty panel" term is a shot in the foot... and a bit unfair.... as Bhall said what is happening is they've mandated the dimensions of the crash structure inside the nose, but allowed the non-structural "aerodynamic" bodywork to be shaped as the designer see fit. its what should have happened for 2012 if they'd thought it through properly.
COMPETITION CAR ENGINEERING -Home of VIRTUAL STOPWATCH

User avatar
turbof1
Moderator
Joined: 19 Jul 2012, 21:36
Location: MountDoom CFD Matrix

Re: Teams agree to cover up ugly noses for 2013

Post

They actually did. Well they didn't expect that almost every team would run the platipus nose, but it was a step towards the 2014 regs, in which they would have dissapeared too. The real shooting in the foot is that they reversed the 2014 rules (on that front; I am actually quite happy that they did).
#AeroFrodo

gold333
gold333
7
Joined: 16 May 2011, 02:59

Re: Teams agree to cover up ugly noses for 2013

Post

Why not get rid of the stepped bottom and go back to a proper wide low single seater skirting the ground? That would eliminate this whole nose mess.
F1 car width now 2.0m (same as 1993-1997). Lets go crazy and bring the 2.2m cars back (<1992).

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Teams agree to cover up ugly noses for 2013

Post

gold333 wrote:Why not get rid of the stepped bottom and go back to a proper wide low single seater skirting the ground? That would eliminate this whole nose mess.
I never understand why people refer to these noses as "proper" or other such terms. What you really mean is "the nose design these cars had when I first got into F1."

F1 car noses actually started off high remember:
Image

User avatar
Leendert82
6
Joined: 13 Dec 2012, 09:40
Location: Malaysia

Re: Teams agree to cover up ugly noses for 2013

Post

Will the new cover on top of the nose help aerodinamicly with the flow to the back of the car?

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Teams agree to cover up ugly noses for 2013

Post

Leendert82 wrote:Will the new cover on top of the nose help aerodinamicly with the flow to the back of the car?
Almost certainly – if a smooth top to the nose didn't work better, we would have seen steped noses before 2012.

User avatar
Leendert82
6
Joined: 13 Dec 2012, 09:40
Location: Malaysia

Re: Teams agree to cover up ugly noses for 2013

Post

beelsebob wrote:
Leendert82 wrote:Will the new cover on top of the nose help aerodinamicly with the flow to the back of the car?
Almost certainly – if a smooth top to the nose didn't work better, we would have seen steped noses before 2012.
I thought the step nose ws required as teams did not wanted to change the design of the chassis that much. Only McLaran did not do the step nose because they did not needed to change the chasis. Wondering how the McLaran will look like in 2013. And if there are teams who rather not use the cover for the step nose.

beelsebob
beelsebob
85
Joined: 23 Mar 2011, 15:49
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: Teams agree to cover up ugly noses for 2013

Post

Leendert82 wrote:
beelsebob wrote:
Leendert82 wrote:Will the new cover on top of the nose help aerodinamicly with the flow to the back of the car?
Almost certainly – if a smooth top to the nose didn't work better, we would have seen steped noses before 2012.
I thought the step nose ws required as teams did not wanted to change the design of the chassis that much. Only McLaran did not do the step nose because they did not needed to change the chasis. Wondering how the McLaran will look like in 2013. And if there are teams who rather not use the cover for the step nose.
Yes... i.e. the teams wanted a smooth nose, but couldn't do it. i.e. a smooth nose has better aerodynamics, but other compromises were involved.

User avatar
raymondu999
54
Joined: 04 Feb 2010, 07:31

Re: Teams agree to cover up ugly noses for 2013

Post

Yep. The teams made the step nose not to have a stepped nose - but to exploit the maximum under-chassis height, to have more air to feed the underfloor.
失败者找理由,成功者找方法

gold333
gold333
7
Joined: 16 May 2011, 02:59

Re: Teams agree to cover up ugly noses for 2013

Post

beelsebob wrote:
gold333 wrote:Why not get rid of the stepped bottom and go back to a proper wide low single seater skirting the ground? That would eliminate this whole nose mess.
I never understand why people refer to these noses as "proper" or other such terms. What you really mean is "the nose design these cars had when I first got into F1."

F1 car noses actually started off high remember
They also started with skinny tires.

With "proper" I mean the culmination of evolution to make F1 cars lower, wider, faster (and to me more beautiful).

This culminated through decades until the year 1992.

It was after that that we had a reduction in tire widths and (due to Imola 94) the stepped bottom (which led to the high noses).

They are all effects that can be traced back to slowing the cars from their peak in 1992.
Last edited by Richard on 29 Jan 2013, 19:54, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: Removed image quoted from earlier post
F1 car width now 2.0m (same as 1993-1997). Lets go crazy and bring the 2.2m cars back (<1992).