turbof1 wrote:Whatever Ilmor develops for Renault, Renault will get full IP rights for it.FoxHound wrote:No, you have 2 suppliers...Ilmor and Renault, and 2 official benefactors....Renault's official team and Red Bull.iotar__ wrote: No, you have only one party, engine maker and supplier decides.
Ilmor have a complete interest in helping Red Bull, and Renault a complete interest in helping themselves.
If an engine supplier is meant to be deeply embedded in the team, you begin to see the working issues.
It is....design by committee.
Factual. This is how consultancy works. Basically Renault outsourced a part of the development work.FoxHound wrote: Is this factual? Or supposition?
So Red Bull are pumping millions into Ilmor, with nothing more than a hope for a better engine?turbof1 wrote:Factual. This is how consultancy works. Basically Renault outsourced a part of the development work.FoxHound wrote: Is this factual? Or supposition?
That's supposition. First of all let's look at possible costs/investments akready made:FoxHound wrote: So Red Bull are pumping millions into Ilmor, with nothing more than a hope for a better engine?
It's tough for us outsiders to understand what really went down, isn't it. Maybe we'll get to hear within a few years what truly happened.wuzak wrote:My understanding was that Ilien's work this year was in subcontracting to Renault, not Red Bull.
This was done in an unstructured manner. Ilien's involvement next season will be more structured and more full time.
I also understand that the mythical Ilmor head/combustion chamber gave similar results to Renault's.
Looks like it's all renault. But i do feel if redbull wants more they can pay renault for the extra work to get them more.Marko added that Red Bull will receive the same Renault engine as the factory team.
"I'm glad that Renault has finally decided to take over Lotus and remain in Formula 1," he said.
"We will get the same Renault power units as the factory team. Mario Illien, with his company Ilmor, will work as a consultant with Renault to develop the engine. Renault asked him to do that."
from Renault : We’ll also carry on developing our activity as an engine supplier, but only in accordance with the interests of our works team."ringo wrote:from Marko:
Looks like it's all renault. But i do feel if redbull wants more they can pay renault for the extra work to get them more.Marko added that Red Bull will receive the same Renault engine as the factory team.
"I'm glad that Renault has finally decided to take over Lotus and remain in Formula 1," he said.
"We will get the same Renault power units as the factory team. Mario Illien, with his company Ilmor, will work as a consultant with Renault to develop the engine. Renault asked him to do that."
i think that was directed to red bull making it quite clear that the renault chassis will be their main focus and not whatever demands red bull has.giantfan10 wrote:from Renault : We’ll also carry on developing our activity as an engine supplier, but only in accordance with the interests of our works team."ringo wrote:from Marko:
Looks like it's all renault. But i do feel if redbull wants more they can pay renault for the extra work to get them more.Marko added that Red Bull will receive the same Renault engine as the factory team.
"I'm glad that Renault has finally decided to take over Lotus and remain in Formula 1," he said.
"We will get the same Renault power units as the factory team. Mario Illien, with his company Ilmor, will work as a consultant with Renault to develop the engine. Renault asked him to do that."
Just thinking.... what would the benefits of exhaust blown technology applied to turbos be ?NL_Fer wrote:If we take the current Renault PU as a base. We know Reanult didn't like Illiens cilinder ideas. What if Illien made some custom pistons and heads to increase power, they could still be using the same ERS and gain an advantage over the stanard Renault engine.
Even if the Illien cilinders would produce more exhaust gasses, the ERS would gain from it.
Look at Honda vs Renault this year, there nothing wrong with Renaults ERS, problem is the ICE. The Fia dictated most of the ICE design, so Crank, rods, blocks are pretty simylar. It's about pistons, heads and turbo's
Honda ERS problem is mostly down to the Turbocharger, not the mgu's.
But don't underestimate the influence of exhaust gasses on ERS.
Errrr, that's kinda the whole point of a Turbo, to use the exhaust gasses to spin a Turbine to drive a compressor to cram more air into the engine and boost power and or efficiency.Rolly7 wrote: Just thinking.... what would the benefits of exhaust blown technology applied to turbos be ?
Yes, that's called an anti-lag system and there are several ways to do it:Rolly7 wrote:Forgive me for my ignorance. I get the turbo principles, i was just wondering whether or not supplying constant exhaust gases at a higher pressure when off throttle would make a difference or not.