can you two cut it now....
because this discussion has nothng to do with AUSGP and both of you are right in some things, and then you both are wrong on other.
just agree to disagree
Obviously is just one of the effect, but the Mercedes has a very low rake, so that it should be less sensitive to changes in height. It is just a different approach as is looks like Ferrari generate more downforce from the floor than Mercedes. A lot of factors are involved in the stiffness of the springs, I don't think we can just compare two very different approaches by focusing only on one factor.GrandAxe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2019 6:55 pmIts not that simple, especially as the Merc is much faster than most through the corners.matteosc wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2019 5:56 pmBouncing on bumps is very relevant to cornering grip, as the airflow below the car and therefore the downforce are highly influenced. I suspect that their soft setup and high rake doesn't work that well with bumps an uneven surfaces.GrandAxe wrote: ↑Fri Mar 15, 2019 5:38 pm
Its how the car bounces on the bumps, not cornering performance that they're talking about. The mercs are quite stiffly sprung.
However, since it doesn't affect cornering grip, its hard to understand why many think this is slowing them down and equally difficult to see how they can gain much more speed by getting rid of their stiffly sprung set up.
A lot depends on how the various parts of the car compensate (or not) aero performance when in oversteer or understeer conditions.
I think that's an astute point.Schuttelberg wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 7:49 amThe truth probably lies in the most underrated aspect of our sport which is team work. I think Lewis was awfully managed at McLaren and I think the same is happening for Seb at Ferrari.
Amazing, quite a bit faster than LHJuzh wrote: ↑Fri Mar 22, 2019 11:49 amI didn't spot this initally, but here's bottas absolutely bossing T11-12 on his second q3 lap:
https://streamable.com/jdc51
Because of a bit slower entry speed (5 kmh down on the straight) he almost takes it flat
agree. Hamilton was massively off the pace on Monaco 2017 as well. And that to stop on 2017/2018.Juzh wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 8:36 amI'm not sure which F1 you were watching, but one thing that can not be denied is that hamilton did have off weekends in the last couple of years where he simply wasn't on the pace. I remember russia in 2017 and canada last year off the top of my head, maybe there were some others. He didn't make any costly mistakes though.
On the other side, verstappen and vettel are pretty much never off the pace, but are more error prone.
Juzh wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 9:24 amYour condesending theory falls flat on its head because RB14 was faster trough pretty much every corner in 2018 than RB15 is in 2019, and was also faster than mercedes (not even gonna include ferrari here), something that clearly isn't the case this year. Comparing red bull to mclaren is just dumb, no offence. RB has actually proven their worth by winning races where PU was not as important and by often times having the best non-power hungry sectors on various tracks.
All I'm waiting for you to say now is that renault PU was more or less equal last year and then I've seen it all.
Thanks mate!Wynters wrote: ↑Mon Mar 25, 2019 5:26 pmI think that's an astute point.Schuttelberg wrote: ↑Sat Mar 23, 2019 7:49 amThe truth probably lies in the most underrated aspect of our sport which is team work. I think Lewis was awfully managed at McLaren and I think the same is happening for Seb at Ferrari.
OrJuzh wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 9:54 am3 explanations imo:NathanOlder wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 9:39 amWould you like to answer my original question?Juzh wrote: ↑Sun Mar 24, 2019 9:24 am
Your condesending theory falls flat on its head because RB14 was faster trough pretty much every corner in 2018 than RB15 is in 2019, and was also faster than mercedes (not even gonna include ferrari here), something that clearly isn't the case this year. Comparing red bull to mclaren is just dumb, no offence. RB has actually proven their worth by winning races where PU was not as important and by often times having the best non-power hungry sectors on various tracks.
All I'm waiting for you to say now is that renault PU was more or less equal last year and then I've seen it all.
If RedBull had got back to 2018 downforce levels, and Honda have given them a huge power gain to compete, why are they only 0.5 faster?
Remembering Ferrari and Merc made bigger jumps but there's no way they have gained as much BHP as RedBull have over the winter.
1. RB/helmut marko are lying about how much downforce they managed to regain.
2. merc/ferrari regained all their downforce and then some
3. both of the above
Option 3 seems the most plausible. Onboard footage and accompanying telemetry would confirm this. RB gained massive power boost, but dropped the ball on the chassis side, kinda like the start of 2017, but a stronger engine is compensating this year.