That´s not odd in wet conditions. Actually DeLa Rosa said before the start it´s quite common to limit whelspin
That´s not odd in wet conditions. Actually DeLa Rosa said before the start it´s quite common to limit whelspin
But that isn’t what they are saying. They are stating AGAIN that a sensor is the only way to judge and if it was to be faulty then they cannot anyway.Andres125sx wrote: ↑21 Jul 2020, 08:05I think it would have been extremelly unfair to punish Bottas. Common sense should always be applied, jump start detection is mean to avoid any driver taking advantage of a jump start, but going from 2nd to 6th none can argue he got any advantage
He took advantage before and they still didn't do anything.Andres125sx wrote: ↑21 Jul 2020, 08:05I think it would have been extremelly unfair to punish Bottas. Common sense should always be applied, jump start detection is mean to avoid any driver taking advantage of a jump start, but going from 2nd to 6th none can argue he got any advantage
The FIA system is a loop in the track's surface and a transponder on the car. The loop registers if the transponder moves. Or at least that's the idea. It shouldn't matter if the car isn't exactly over the loop, if it "sees" movement it should trigger an alert.
It's not just about gaining an advantage; It's also about influencing other drivers around you by moving before you should.Andres125sx wrote: ↑21 Jul 2020, 08:05I think it would have been extremelly unfair to punish Bottas. Common sense should always be applied, jump start detection is mean to avoid any driver taking advantage of a jump start, but going from 2nd to 6th none can argue he got any advantage
If the transponder can't sense it then either8.6.1 A false Start occurs when an Automobile:
8.6.1.b moves forward from the prescribed position before
the Start signal is given;
or the transponders are --- and the system has to be improved.36.14 Any of the penalties under Articles 38.3 a), b), or c) will be imposed on any driver who is judged
to have:
b) Positioned his car on the starting grid in such a way that the transponder is unable to
detect the moment at which the car first moved from its grid position after the start signal
is given
Doesn't even need to be 4K really. A decent HD camera positioned to look at the front edge of each grid box would be sufficient. Place them on the pitwall opposite the respective grip positions and you're sorted. The beauty of the staggered grid is that the cameras can all be along one side so easy to set up/manage. Have the footage "watched" by a computer to see if there is any movement in the frame, flag any feed that shows movement and then have a human check the flagged feeds. As the first few laps are underway, all of the feeds can also be double checked by the human to ensure none is missed by the computer.
Yep. It’s why in athletics it’s only the first to move that’s get the penalty. Just like a sprinter in his blocks a driver is set to go.Phil wrote: ↑21 Jul 2020, 10:37It's not just about gaining an advantage; It's also about influencing other drivers around you by moving before you should.Andres125sx wrote: ↑21 Jul 2020, 08:05I think it would have been extremelly unfair to punish Bottas. Common sense should always be applied, jump start detection is mean to avoid any driver taking advantage of a jump start, but going from 2nd to 6th none can argue he got any advantage
Yeah actually I realised that shortly after I’d posted it, having totally forgotten the conditions of the start! However, I DID say it so I thought I had to leave it out there...Andres125sx wrote: ↑21 Jul 2020, 08:06That´s not odd in wet conditions. Actually DeLa Rosa said before the start it´s quite common to limit whelspin
He was quicker away on the first meters. It was not impossible to have traction on the right side of the grid. But they all got stuck on the inside behind eachother and especially behind Bottas who had a poor start followed up by a poor going into turn 1.Andres125sx wrote: ↑21 Jul 2020, 08:03He just passed Perez and Bottas, just Perez on merit (Bottas failed), both of them in the dirty side of the grid, and got passed by Max. I´d not call that a blistering fast start
Furthermore; he didn't even leave the starting box.Andres125sx wrote: ↑21 Jul 2020, 08:05I think it would have been extremelly unfair to punish Bottas. Common sense should always be applied, jump start detection is mean to avoid any driver taking advantage of a jump start, but going from 2nd to 6th none can argue he got any advantage
Perhaps very slightly, but Vettel is in no danger from him. Other than Leclerc, no driver on that side of the grid even managed an average start. By the time the field got to the first corner (which they could take three wide), they were already splitting into sections. Hamilton (clean side), then Stroll / Vettel / Verstappen (all clean side), then Leclerc / Bottas / Perez (all dirty side and have lost positions), then Sainz / Ricciardo (all clean side). The top six clean side of the grid starters make up six of the nine leading places and all of the leading four.*Sieper wrote: ↑21 Jul 2020, 12:14He was quicker away on the first meters. It was not impossible to have traction on the right side of the grid. But they all got stuck on the inside behind eachother and especially behind Bottas who had a poor start followed up by a poor going into turn 1.Andres125sx wrote: ↑21 Jul 2020, 08:03He just passed Perez and Bottas, just Perez on merit (Bottas failed), both of them in the dirty side of the grid, and got passed by Max. I´d not call that a blistering fast start