This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
You don't understand, and you're burying yourself. Air has momentum, in physics there are these principles called inertia, and conservation of angular momentum, think a bit friend.
My degree is in computational physics, I literally went to college to learn how to mathematically model and simulate this type of thing, I'm not the one burying myself.
and I'm out before this becomes even more off topic.
Look how stable the Red Bull is until it gets too close.
actually , I understand aerodynamics pretty well. You seemed to have glanced over Chilvers important qualifier.
Dirty air on the other hand occurs in the corners, where the cars are already in a grip limited condition. The lead car
In china 2018, Max was not grip limited. He had plenty of grip, and if lewis hadn't understerred out into Max's path, he would have powered around the outside like Lewis wasn't even there.
You don't understand, and you're burying yourself. Air has momentum, in physics there are these principles called inertia, and conservation of angular momentum, think a bit friend. If the car is turning left(like it is in the video), then the air is going to the right, Verstappen's car is on the right, where the air is being pushed because Hamilton's car is under yaw. If the leading car's wake reduces downforce, Verstappen should not be able to follow so closely, and yet video evidence shows he could. Until he got too close to Hamilton's car and he got a oversteer snap. Why would the car get an oversteer snap if the wake lowers downforce at the front of the car first?
Max had a significant tire advantage, that's why even with less downforce he could folow this closely.
It could be an oversteer snap due loss of downforce, but it could just as easy be a lack grip due to a dirty surcface just outside the racing line, or a shock steering movement for not wanting to collide with Lewis, as at that time they were on a collision course.
Furthermore I don't understand what you're trying to prove with this video. Let's say you were right about the loss of downforce at that point, how does that reflect on the 'aerial situation' one second behind the car? The influence of car's shape behinds the bargeboards dictates the shape of the turbulence and wake behind the car.
🤭 wrote:
“Being the 'most successful statistically' has nothing to do with being the 'best'. neither when it comes to the cars, nor when it comes to the drivers” 😂
Redbull looks like third best team on a track were pu performance is not that important really ,were are you Marko maybe you should full charge those batteries it may help you leapfrog the Ferraris
