Personally, I was very surprised by your over reaction.KingHamilton01 wrote: ↑21 Mar 2022, 10:221st You clearly didn’t read what I had written originally judging from your reply to me. It wasn’t an argument, I put my opinion across and suggested it was an example. He then proceeded to suggest I can’t make an type of suggestion by eye aero. Also on top of that swearing within his own reply, but no he wasn’t being aggressive? And if you class swearing as being constructive then good luck to you on that one.DiogoBrand wrote: ↑21 Mar 2022, 03:48I'm sorry, what?KingHamilton01 wrote: ↑20 Mar 2022, 15:11That was a very insightful reply, I never suggested that having an undercut in there sidepod was necassarily the way to go, if you actually read what I wrote then you would realise I put that as an example. Honestly why is there so much hostility in this forum? You could have just put your opinion instead of swearing and suggesting I am just looking at the car and saying they should copy another one? or eye aero as you put it.
I would suggest in future if you don't have anything constructive to reply then don't bother, didn't realise you were the resident expert around here, but please don't reply trying to be little me.
He basically just constructively countered your argument without attacking you in any way, and you reply saying he was hostile and tried to belittle you in some way?
There is absolutely no evidence to us, without seeing any data, that McLaren's sidepods are problematic. We know they've definitely have an issue with brake cooling, which may or may not have an impact on the rest of the car's aero. We may speculate that Mercedes' Power Unit isn't top notch this year, since the worst 6 cars used Merc PUs, and even Mercedes themselves wasn't as fast as expected. There's the fact that McLaren is the only team to route the air from above the tea tray around the sidepods and so on and so forth.
There is also the fact that between the top 3 teams we have different power units and completely different sidepod philosophies, including the fact that the fastest team of the weekend has even bulkier sidepods than McLaren in terms of frontal area.
So randomly arguing about what concept the team could revolutionize after the first race weekend, even before they've fixed their big known issues, is not very constructive and you can expect that people won't agree with you if you do so.
Why do you have to weigh on it anyway, he can speak for himself and has already done so.
You then come in saying I was arguing about sidepod concept when I wasn’t, I stated my opinion. Of course people don’t have to agree with each other on here but you are wrong with your reply. Trying to suggest I am saying to revolutionise sidepod concept and then say it’s not very constructive. There have been plenty of sensible replies to what I put on here, but thanks for showing me you aren’t someone to engage with on here also.
Better still maybe the moderator’s should have a look at how members are participating in replying to people here….? Is this acceptable behaviour?
No one was swearing at you.
Honestly, I think you’ve got this one wrong mate.
