This aged well...diffuser wrote: ↑27 Nov 2023, 11:05Cause you keep thinking he's there to win but he gets paid to survive. As far as Haas is concerned, Steiner is better than Horner. Haas basically work out of a suitcase. They will be a perpetual bottom dweller until that changes.Zynerji wrote: ↑27 Nov 2023, 03:16So. No one talking about Nico using the old spec car and being faster than the new spec.
When will this complete failure of a team principal be held accountable for how awful this is? Can anyone explain the relentless disappointment of this team, and how its allowed to continue?
The fact that Steiner is still employed in F1 is utterly mind boggling to me.
Indeed, though I would have thought with Honda power. Stroll probably wouldn't have OK'd that though.
It is completely his fault.
The telling sign of Haas's problem is that the TP is also sales head and is responsible for bringing in revenue ..... sarcasm.FW17 wrote: ↑11 Jan 2024, 10:19It is completely his fault.
1. Convinced Gene Haas not to buy Manor entry, lost out on the price money
2. Going racing without a concord agreement
3. Having 3 locations of operation that became 4
4. Sticking Esteban Gutierrez in the car
5. Sticking with same driver pairing for every year who brought no money to the team, while there was no money coming from sponsors
6. Getting on board with with Rich Energy without DD, maybe that was partly Gene Haas too
7. Firing Schumacher and getting Hulk in
The difference in opinion between Haas and Stiner was on investment to move the team forward.
> There was no plan in where the team would like to be based. What are people doing at Banbury, why buy that place?
>The car was designed at Dallara and then Maranello, made from parts manufactured by Dallara, Maranello and USA but way not base the team in Italy?
>Stainer as boss of the team never spoke of a plan to move forward.
>He wanted investment to build up something new somewhere, but wanted Gene to foot the bill while till date has not delivered consistently with the set up he placed
> Why not fund the expansion with Felipe Drugovich, Theo Pourchaire, Marcus Ericson or Nicolas Latifi money
Gunter style of management for Haas
https://www.economyhandicrafts.com/medi ... /ga213.jpg
.FW17 wrote: ↑11 Jan 2024, 10:19.
It is completely his fault.
1. Convinced Gene Haas not to buy Manor entry, lost out on the price money
2. Going racing without a concord agreement
3. Having 3 locations of operation that became 4
4. Sticking Esteban Gutierrez in the car
5. Sticking with same driver pairing for every year who brought no money to the team, while there was no money coming from sponsors
6. Getting on board with with Rich Energy without DD, maybe that was partly Gene Haas too
7. Firing Schumacher and getting Hulk in
The difference in opinion between Haas and Stiner was on investment to move the team forward.
> There was no plan in where the team would like to be based. What are people doing at Banbury, why buy that place?
>The car was designed at Dallara and then Maranello, made from parts manufactured by Dallara, Maranello and USA but way not base the team in Italy?
>Stainer as boss of the team never spoke of a plan to move forward.
>He wanted investment to build up something new somewhere, but wanted Gene to foot the bill while till date has not delivered consistently with the set up he placed
> Why not fund the expansion with Felipe Drugovich, Theo Pourchaire, Marcus Ericson or Nicolas Latifi money
Gunter style of management for Haas
https://www.economyhandicrafts.com/medi ... /ga213.jpg
HAAS WAS 'STEINER F1 TEAM' IN ALL BUT NAMEWouter wrote: ↑11 Jan 2024, 13:14.
Maybe you don't know that for every decision, Günter Steiner had to first call Gene Haas to get his permission.
Gene Haas has always been in control. Steiner had nothing to say!!
Now that there is another TP, nothing will change at all!
Moreover, Gene Haas wanted it to cost as little money as possible. Steiner did not receive any money to realize his plans!