Mercedes W14

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
Venturiation
Venturiation
98
Joined: 04 Jan 2023, 19:48

Re: Mercedes W14

Post

is it true that the highest downforce rear wing is the one that causes the more porpoising?
if that's so then would that mean that mercedes were controlling porpoising very well during this bahrain testing and with a lower DF wing it will be even better?
the were running the high DF RW to compare with the W13

Evo2racer
Evo2racer
1
Joined: 21 Mar 2022, 12:05

Re: Mercedes W14

Post

So Mike Elliot confirmed they will stick to their concepts of very small/almost zero sidepods !

Plus that they will put a much smaller rear wing when the Bahrain race weekend comes !

Very interesting all these details & confirmations he gave with Ted Kravitz on Sky F1, really fascinating interview Imo

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
335
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Mercedes W14

Post

Evo2racer wrote:
26 Feb 2023, 20:22
So Mike Elliot confirmed they will stick to their concepts of very small/almost zero sidepods !

Plus that they will put a much smaller rear wing when the Bahrain race weekend comes !

Very interesting all these details & confirmations he gave with Ted Kravitz on Sky F1, really fascinating interview Imo
All he said was they would have a different sidepod that wouldn't look like RB/Ferrari. He never said they would still be "very small/almost zero sidepods".

User avatar
organic
986
Joined: 08 Jan 2022, 02:24
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: Mercedes W14

Post

I don't see how a lower df rear wing would solve any of the issues the w14 seems to have at the moment

Henk_v
Henk_v
80
Joined: 24 Feb 2022, 13:41

Re: Mercedes W14

Post

That's what I posted, bit got modded away I guess. Lots of braking issues, slow on the gas. And that on a max DF rear wing and the front wing cranked up.

Yes, the speed trap will smile on you for losing some drag, but that does not equate to laptime

Femi
Femi
2
Joined: 21 Mar 2019, 01:05

Re: Mercedes W14

Post

organic wrote:
26 Feb 2023, 20:25
I don't see how a lower df rear wing would solve any of the issues the w14 seems to have at the moment
Eliot mentioned "rear wing" in context of addressing W14 "low" top speed issue

User avatar
organic
986
Joined: 08 Jan 2022, 02:24
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: Mercedes W14

Post

They probably planned this new rear wing before the traction and rear-stability issues they've had at testing appeared. If they don't get their setup sorted properly I fully expect them to use the barn door once again

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
335
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Mercedes W14

Post

Henk_v wrote:
26 Feb 2023, 20:28
That's what I posted, bit got modded away I guess.
It wasn't deleted. Check the general aero thread or the Mercedes f1 team thread. Some cleaning was done.

Henk_v
Henk_v
80
Joined: 24 Feb 2022, 13:41

Re: Mercedes W14

Post

Ah, I got confused thanks

mantikos
mantikos
35
Joined: 02 Mar 2011, 17:35

Re: Mercedes W14

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
26 Feb 2023, 20:24
Evo2racer wrote:
26 Feb 2023, 20:22
So Mike Elliot confirmed they will stick to their concepts of very small/almost zero sidepods !

Plus that they will put a much smaller rear wing when the Bahrain race weekend comes !

Very interesting all these details & confirmations he gave with Ted Kravitz on Sky F1, really fascinating interview Imo
All he said was they would have a different sidepod that wouldn't look like RB/Ferrari. He never said they would still be "very small/almost zero sidepods".
He clearly said an evolution of our concept/design

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
335
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Mercedes W14

Post

mantikos wrote:
26 Feb 2023, 20:45
AR3-GP wrote:
26 Feb 2023, 20:24
Evo2racer wrote:
26 Feb 2023, 20:22
So Mike Elliot confirmed they will stick to their concepts of very small/almost zero sidepods !

Plus that they will put a much smaller rear wing when the Bahrain race weekend comes !

Very interesting all these details & confirmations he gave with Ted Kravitz on Sky F1, really fascinating interview Imo
All he said was they would have a different sidepod that wouldn't look like RB/Ferrari. He never said they would still be "very small/almost zero sidepods".
He clearly said an evolution of our concept/design
We shall see then.

Evo2racer
Evo2racer
1
Joined: 21 Mar 2022, 12:05

Re: Mercedes W14

Post

Did anyone @ MB explain what happen in the second day of testing ? Why they spent almost all night rebuilding the chassis after day 2 ?

Or a reason why the W14 lost all the front downforce and was almost undriveable on day 2 ?

AR3-GP
AR3-GP
335
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Mercedes W14

Post

Evo2racer wrote:
26 Feb 2023, 22:25
Did anyone @ MB explain what happen in the second day of testing ? Why they spent almost all night rebuilding the chassis after day 2 ?

Or a reason why the W14 lost all the front downforce and was almost undriveable on day 2 ?
Not really, but reading between the lines, they must have lowered the car when the issues occurred.

User avatar
ringo
227
Joined: 29 Mar 2009, 10:57

Re: Mercedes W14

Post

organic wrote:
26 Feb 2023, 20:34
They probably planned this new rear wing before the traction and rear-stability issues they've had at testing appeared. If they don't get their setup sorted properly I fully expect them to use the barn door once again
Maybe they were using a high load wing to induce the most df as a test of their new suspension in isolation from preparing for the first race.
For Sure!!

User avatar
organic
986
Joined: 08 Jan 2022, 02:24
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: Mercedes W14

Post

ringo wrote:
26 Feb 2023, 23:12
organic wrote:
26 Feb 2023, 20:34
They probably planned this new rear wing before the traction and rear-stability issues they've had at testing appeared. If they don't get their setup sorted properly I fully expect them to use the barn door once again
Maybe they were using a high load wing to induce the most df as a test of their new suspension in isolation from preparing for the first race.
That makes sense