What would you add to F1technical?

Everything about this website and its content. Here you will find update announcements or requests for feedback. Questions about layout, functionality, content, and your suggestions are welcome.
marcush.
marcush.
159
Joined: 09 Mar 2004, 16:55

Re: What would you add to F1technical?

Post

I think we should add a sticky thread about :
Chassis
Gearbox
Engine

use by teamsdrivers and races maybe it is even possible to get detailed information about gearbox number7engine numbers from teams to create a real solid
database for 2011
any volunteers to knock at the doors of the teams kindly asking for updating infos ?

bettonracing
bettonracing
1
Joined: 12 Oct 2007, 15:57

Re: What would you add to F1technical?

Post

Forgive me if this has been mentioned already (24 pages!), but I'd like to see some form of noob filtering on technical topics.

Example of the problem: 4 to 8 pages of technical debate & a noob (4 posts) walks in and says "no it can't be done because I've never seen it used like that".

Another example: 25 pages of discussion. Last post made in 2005. Dead thread. Noob walks in and responds to somebody, quotes and all, "this is bs. <insert useless opinion here>". Otherwise referred to as "walking into a 5yo thread and responding like it was posted yesterday"...

Possible solution: If the user (i.e. noob) has <25posts, responses to threads (except for threads they started) must be approved by a moderator. Moderators may decide to increase, or decrease, the required # of posts before the user's responses need approval (e.g. noob turns out to be an idiot, or conversely, an ex-F1 engineer).

It's more work (for the mods), and may deter a few noobs, but will help maintain the integrity of the site (or at least those specific threads), and likely reduce the number of [useless] pages for some threads... Useful noobs will have their posts approved and return to site. Dead thread allowed to stay open incase somebody has useful, relevant info 5 years down the line. Everybody happy. Especially me.

Regards,

Kurt

carvetia
carvetia
0
Joined: 22 Apr 2008, 10:51

Re: What would you add to F1technical?

Post

Tangentially related to what bettonracing said above - I think you need to fine-tune the "Similar topics" feature at the bottom of each topic page. It frequently pulls topics out from a long, long time ago (2002!!) and no doubt this is probably where a lot of people are discovering these really old topics from in the first place. If it could be limited to displaying just topics in a more recent time frame it would be both more helpful and less disruptive! :)

User avatar
Steven
Owner
Joined: 19 Aug 2002, 18:32
Location: Belgium

Re: What would you add to F1technical?

Post

carvetia wrote:Tangentially related to what bettonracing said above - I think you need to fine-tune the "Similar topics" feature at the bottom of each topic page. It frequently pulls topics out from a long, long time ago (2002!!) and no doubt this is probably where a lot of people are discovering these really old topics from in the first place. If it could be limited to displaying just topics in a more recent time frame it would be both more helpful and less disruptive! :)
Allright, your wish has been granted!
The related topics system has been improved with a better relevancy determination and filtering out very old threads from the results. Hope it's useful.

User avatar
Pandamasque
17
Joined: 09 Nov 2009, 17:28
Location: Kyiv, Ukraine

Re: What would you add to F1technical?

Post

Happy new year!

Is there a place anywhere on the website or forum with all the 2011 car presentation dates?

Formula None
Formula None
1
Joined: 17 Nov 2010, 05:23

Re: What would you add to F1technical?

Post

I agree with Panda, a countdown of some sort on the car releases would be neat. Also, it would be great if the car threads would be created in coincidence with these revealings. The car threads are 90% BS for 3 months, people going on about finance, the driver they fancy, going over paint swatches trying to guess the next livery and contemplating what kind of curtains will be hung in the team trailers.

Also, It would be nice if the search function could work for alpha numeric queries. For example, in the box up top, select forum and then search for F10, R27, MP4-26 or similar. As is, these are not recognized as proper search terms.

Happy new year, and thanks for maintaining one of the best motorsports forums on the net.

User avatar
N12ck
11
Joined: 19 Dec 2010, 19:10

Re: What would you add to F1technical?

Post

I think we need to introduce a teams thread, where we discuss the teams and politics between them/ personell changes / anything generally about that team.
Budding F1 Engineer

nipo
nipo
0
Joined: 30 Jul 2009, 04:45
Location: Hong Kong

Re: What would you add to F1technical?

Post

bettonracing wrote:Possible solution: If the user (i.e. noob) has <25posts, responses to threads (except for threads they started) must be approved by a moderator. Moderators may decide to increase, or decrease, the required # of posts before the user's responses need approval (e.g. noob turns out to be an idiot, or conversely, an ex-F1 engineer).

It's more work (for the mods), and may deter a few noobs, but will help maintain the integrity of the site (or at least those specific threads), and likely reduce the number of [useless] pages for some threads... Useful noobs will have their posts approved and return to site. Dead thread allowed to stay open incase somebody has useful, relevant info 5 years down the line. Everybody happy. Especially me.
Have you seen this successfully implemented elsewhere? I doubt it.

First it is a hell lot more work for the mods.
Then it is an unreasonable rule for an "open" forum.
You also led us to think that troublemakers are mostly the noobs, to which I disagree.

I think the mods are busy enough just to monitor threads, censor contents, split topics, get discussions back on track etc. It seems today this is still the only viable way of maintaining a healthy forum.

User avatar
Steven
Owner
Joined: 19 Aug 2002, 18:32
Location: Belgium

Re: What would you add to F1technical?

Post

Pandamasque wrote:Happy new year!

Is there a place anywhere on the website or forum with all the 2011 car presentation dates?
Sure: News > Event calendar: http://www.f1technical.net/calendar/
Launches are a special category, dates will be added as soon as we know about them!
nipo wrote:
bettonracing wrote:Possible solution: If the user (i.e. noob) has <25posts, responses to threads (except for threads they started) must be approved by a moderator. Moderators may decide to increase, or decrease, the required # of posts before the user's responses need approval (e.g. noob turns out to be an idiot, or conversely, an ex-F1 engineer).
Have you seen this successfully implemented elsewhere? I doubt it.

First it is a hell lot more work for the mods.
Then it is an unreasonable rule for an "open" forum.
You also led us to think that troublemakers are mostly the noobs, to which I disagree.

I think the mods are busy enough just to monitor threads, censor contents, split topics, get discussions back on track etc. It seems today this is still the only viable way of maintaining a healthy forum.
I tend to agree nipo. All this would solve is remove spam, but other than that I would only increase the workload on the mods. We have thought on some kind of promotion system for posts, but there again it would be hard to implement a correct system that prevents users upping their friends' posts.

bettonracing
bettonracing
1
Joined: 12 Oct 2007, 15:57

Re: What would you add to F1technical?

Post

nipo wrote:Have you seen this successfully implemented elsewhere? I doubt it.
Define "successfully". But general answer to Your question: Yes. Here's one off the top of my head. http://www.locostusa.com/forums/viewfor ... 164495fce8
First it is a hell lot more work for the mods.
More work? Yes. "Hell lot"? Not necessarily. If the automatic 'algorithm' is properly developed prior to implementation it could save them alot of work. e.g. If the user has less than x number of posts, they can't just bring up a dead thread and extend it another page (or more) with useless banter.
Then it is an unreasonable rule for an "open" forum.
Define "open". Clearly we're not allowed to come in here and post spam/ porn. There is a line in the sand. I'm proposing we draw that line a little more strategically.
You also led us to think that troublemakers are mostly the noobs, to which I disagree.
There's a distinction between "troublemakers" and "uneducated posters" (even though there is a subset that meet the criteria for both). I'm proposing to minimize the effect of "uneducated posters" (who are usually noobs. The noobs that are educated about the topic, will be allowed to post, and authorization can be expedited). (Note: "Educated" refers to the poster's technical competency about the topic, not their level of academic completion).
I think the mods are busy enough just to monitor threads, censor contents, split topics, get discussions back on track etc. It seems today this is still the only viable way of maintaining a healthy forum.
Define "healthy". I take nothing away from the moderators who are doing a hell of a job keeping up with the "troublemakers", as well as their other numerous duties, and day jobs, but considering this site is becoming (has become?) a frontrunner as a source of technical debate & information, and reduce the influx of "useless posts" before the site begins to lose credibility. My proposal is not the end all solution to all the "useless posts". It's just a small step in that direction.
Tomba wrote:I tend to agree nipo. All this would solve is remove spam...
Define spam. :) (Ok. I'll quit doing that) All the "extra" work You have to clean up around here could be considered some level of spam... You may deem this proposal "not the most effective use of our time with our current resources", but I fail to see how the underlying concept would not be useful.

Best Regards,

H. Kurt Betton

User avatar
747heavy
24
Joined: 06 Jul 2010, 21:45

Re: What would you add to F1technical?

Post

+1 Kurt
I agree 100% with what you say and propose.
Now, it´s not really my field of expertise to know/say, if your proposed changes/solutions are the most efficient way to go, but soemthing should be done - quickly.

At the moment the forum is a far cry from what it says on the can (header).
I´m sure, you can count the number of threads discussing F1 technology/technical details on the fingers of your hands.
And it seems to deteriorate quickly in the last couple of weeks.
"Make the suspension adjustable and they will adjust it wrong ......
look what they can do to a carburetor in just a few moments of stupidity with a screwdriver."
- Colin Chapman

“Simplicity is the ultimate sophistication.” - Leonardo da Vinci

User avatar
Ciro Pabón
106
Joined: 11 May 2005, 00:31

Re: What would you add to F1technical?

Post

nipo wrote:Have you seen this successfully implemented elsewhere? I doubt it.
There are many sites where you cannot post in most subforums until you have a number of posts. This would save mod time and, believe me, I know.

If you want to know the sites where this is the norm, check threads similar to this one (up and including 2002 ;) ) or the mail I interchanged with site owners. I don't think the site will pay attention to the suggestion (again) but I had to say it: bettonracing is right. Oh, he's sooo right... so right that he's wrong! 8)

"Truthful" and "workable" are distinct concepts, allow me to explain.

Proof? I devoted around 2-4 hours of work a day (mostly at night or in the very early morning) to this forum until it became incompatible with me having a life, just trying to prune the threads of irrelevant comments, leading by example instead of censoring. I think many members will concede that.

When that proved unfeasible because of personal reasons, in desperation and, frankly, bored, I started to erase entire pages or, worse, I started threads devoted to ridicule the polemic fanboy approach, in the false belief that this would bring inspiration to "the masses".

In the end, anarchists are not adequate for that kind of "bulk censoring", so, after some months I quit(ted) before allowing the engineering quality of the forum to degenerate under my moderation, like, I believe, nowadays has.

I apologize in advance for the wording but, hey, I'm not a diplomat nor I am interested in making friends with this post. I'm talking about MY experience, I don't give a rat's buttock about opinions: gimme numbers.

Don't get me wrong: I'm not criticizing the quality of this site's programming, nor the speed and intuition that site owners have for client satisfaction through well measured responses neither their excellent handling of news. Owners and actual mods are superb in that sense.

Anyway, car threads are a mod nightmare and I won't make comments about race threads: they are simply unmanageable. To say the truth, most of the comments are irrelevant and lack originality... or they are simply old fights between the more insistent posters (I won't use the word "stupid"... or did I just use it?) who come once and again to insult each other in a thinly veiled manner. They don't like to race, they like to argue with other people (and use racing as a motive).

The people that tried to insert original posts or posts that reflected some research and (let's say it) love for the site and for racing were drowned. You know the posters: those that show respect and admiration for all drivers and also a deep knowledge of racing... or at least people that actually races.

Most of those people, in my knowledge, have left and, allow me to say that I worked my neck off trying to keep them on board.

This made no difference in the number of hits, so... keep on moving, this is an enlightened fan site, not a truly engineering one. Probably it is impossible to have a truly "engineering" site (in the narrow sense I am giving to this word) unless you have a staff of engineers devoted to write articles... and, if they are volunteers, they have to be shielded somehow from the most intractable and (this time I'm going to say the "s" word) stupid posts. This shielding takes a LOT of time from mods. Who cares? Almost nobody does. It is enough to have a couple of engineers on board for this site to survive. Riff_raff, flynn, perhaps 747Heavy and some more (I'm "away" devoted to make money, so I'm not sure who tries to clarify the most blatant errors and the more disgusting "driver racism", but I'm sure they are not a lot).

However, the truth is inescapable: fans are numerous, engineers are few and site owners have to take this fact in account. So, a fan site with moderation adequate for fans we have... and half a dozen engineers. It HAS to be "free for all" and that's the most we can expect from a forum with so many members.

Equations and calculations are sparse, insider posts are hard to find and, except for some notable members that still, once in a while, have the time (i.e. the suspension thread by Belatti comes to my mind) I find nothing I didn't already know (and I still have a lot to learn after 40+ years of racing).

Summing up: most people doesn't come here to learn, but to pontificate. This pontification space sells (check Twitter or Facebook status!), learning doesn't (check Wikileaks position in this new world! "Crushed" is a mild word to describe what Assange is suffering right now).

Live long and prosper, fellow earthlings. Keep the good work, Vulcans (you know who you are).

Well done, Tomba, you rule.

I pray for this post having no answers. I won't write any, anyway... and I still love you all. Besides, this is no suggestion, just a description of the human race, as seen by me.
Ciro

User avatar
Steven
Owner
Joined: 19 Aug 2002, 18:32
Location: Belgium

Re: What would you add to F1technical?

Post

Allright, here we go... I'm not going to react to any of the previous posts directly, just pointing out some things we have done, what we are doing and what I think is the current state of affairs.

Surely, we have gotten complaints about members drowning others, up to a point where none of the mods could really stand it anymore, resulting in a series of bans in Oct/Nov last year. Due to my nature of allowing people a second chance after enforcing some strict rules, most of these were temporariy. In the meantime however, it has shown necessary to act again. Some members have already had their posting rights in some forums withdrawn as a result of that.

Secondly, I wish to point out this is wintertime for everyone, and some of our team are taking a short break. Hence, I would like you to be at least a bit considerate when complaining about the moderation now, last week and next week for that matter. I'm doing my best to cover for the holidays, but you guys are posting a lot :D

Third, I agree that some engineers have been pushed out due to extremely active members. One that comes to mind is ISLAMATRON, someone who I agree was banned too late, but banned nonetheless, and permanently. We're all too aware that people leave before a ban is instated on the troubled ones, and sometimes those departed don't bother to come take a look again. Unfortunately I cannot ask everyone personally to rejoin the discussions.

Fourth, about the minimum post rule and considering Ciro's comments, I concede there is a serious problem with the car threads, even though it has been asked repeatedly to stick to the topic, noting that these are technical threads. Posts are sometimes getting removed without notice (I announced this more than 6 months ago), but it's a hassle to say the least.
The point I made I my previous post however was that a minimum number of posts rule will never solve the issue there, as most off-topic and personal discussions come from members that have far beyond 100 posts around here.
Thinking about it though, perhaps it would indeed pay off to have the car threads set up as post-and-approve-by-mods, so that posts don't appear before a mod has read them.

Fifth, I would also like to point out that, despite some beliefs, people are not banned or kept here for the amount of hits or advertising income they could generate. As Ciro pointed out, no matter who we have banned in history, we haven't seen any effect on visits nor income.

Finally, as you all know, we are all open for discussion about anything, and I would welcome even more input about this site, its design, its features and the state of this forum. We have implemented and changed before lots of things following your requests, and that will remain that way.


Steven

User avatar
JohnsonsEvilTwin
0
Joined: 29 Jan 2010, 11:51
Location: SU 419113

Re: What would you add to F1technical?

Post

How about threads to give us lesser technical posters "lehmans terms" (non formulaic)info that would help educate us to the a decent level.
It kind of happens already from very good posters namely 747, Marcush, Xpensive Jersey Tom(apologies for those i havent metioned)who take the time to explain their posts.

I would be put amongst the higher posting non technical member, and I have learnt alot since joining, principally because of fellow technically minded members guiding the likes of me to understand some issues surrounding F1 cars.

By becoming "elitist" I think this site will lose alot of what makes it great.
More could have been done.
David Purley

User avatar
WhiteBlue
92
Joined: 14 Apr 2008, 20:58
Location: WhiteBlue Country

Re: What would you add to F1technical?

Post

I wonder why there isn't a limit to the number of posts one user can make per day or per month. If there is a problem with too much presence surely a posting limit can take care of that automatically without bothering the mods.

Unless there is a clear policy with figures nobody can be accused of being over present to the detriment of the board. You cannot accuse people to break a rule that does not exist. Give me figures! What is acceptable? Ten posts per day? Thirty? Or even one hundred?

Why don't you try for an automatic cut off at twenty five? And to top it you earn a temporary ban of one week if you exceed your quota three times in one month. If there is a problem then it should be addressed. It cannot hurt if people are forced to switch on their brain before they post.
Formula One's fundamental ethos is about success coming to those with the most ingenious engineering and best .............................. organization, not to those with the biggest budget. (Dave Richards)