you know they have been buying property in the area? That is news to me. Silverstone is totally different from Donington given the industries/services/jobs and many commuties/towns/villages in that corridor that benefitted. In essence, it was an easy sell. So why should tax payers foot the bill if the main beneficiary of any road expansion would be F1 (or motoracing) and its fans?They have the plans for more than a year and have been buying property in edition to the original park. I guess they know what they do. As for the access road or roads why would it be payed for Silverstone from taxpayers money to attract racing business and then not for Donington at a much smaller amount?
Hey, the CVC can still promote and get sponsorship for these races, but the sponsors do not pick what tracks are competed upon now, that is BE choice alone.WhiteBlue wrote:CVC being the commercial rights holder cannot be excluded from marketing the races I think. That has always been a commercial right and they will not contemplate to have that taken away. Nevertheless I feel that the FIA can claim the right to specify what kind of continental distribution and type of track they want to specify. There is nothing wrong in my mind to develop this framework of mixture of races. They have the sporting authority and should develop the framework together with the teams.
You mean no Brit GP at ANY course? I'd be disappoineted, but NOT surprised!Been speaking to various motorsport stakeholders recently and I hate to say it but I think next year will be the last British G.P!
Going to another middle eastern country?Scuderia_Russ wrote:The British G.P. will never be held at Silverstone again while a) Bernie runs F1, b)The B.R.D.C. run Silverstone or c)all of the above. Donington will never raise the finance needed and complete the work needed in time and the space on the calendar will be going somewhere else. Bernies has veiled hating the B.R.D.C. as hating Silverstone. Hence many within the sport can see the reality that next year will be the last British G.P.
so the more fun he will have if the GP is held 80 miles from their doorstep, showing the world how it can be done.Scuderia_Russ wrote:Believe it or not this is not about money. It is about a personal vendetta of Bernies against the B.R.D.C. I won't go into why.
Conceptual wrote:
I don''t think that Bernie is dumb enough to allow a personal feeling to interrupt his job description,
Certain members of the B.R.D.C. forgot this though a couple of years back, hence the loss of the G.P. from Silverstone... and that is all there is to it.Conceptual wrote: he has played the game long enough to know that it hampers long-term relationships.
Chris
I do not see how this theory is holding water. There is a market for GPs and Bernie knows the market better than any other person. The one thing he managed to do very successfull right from the start of the first concord was squashing the power of the race promoters. In actual fact the concord was a marketing strategy against the race promoters and the TV buyers from day one. Bernie isn't likely to forget that and bring those people back into powers. He has dominated them for 27 years by creating a secrete market place where everyone has to dance to his tune. They got used to it so much, none of them woud likely risk their precious races by an attempt to boycott.Conceptual wrote:.. Eventually leading to ALL VENUES refusing to host a GP for a season. You could name every track that meets FIA F1 racing standards on a napkin. It isn't too far of a stretch for them to reach out together, organize, and choke off Bernie's options...
Chris