CaterhamF1 CT-01 Renault

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter does not belong here.
User avatar
awizul
0
Joined: Sat Feb 26, 2011 2:28 am
Location: +8GMT

Re: CaterhamF1 CT-01 Renault

Post

Caterham could beat the entire F1 field to the starting line ahead of the 2012 season :shock:

:arrow: http://motorsport.nextgen-auto.com/Cate ... 35672.html

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
122
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:08 pm
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: CaterhamF1 CT-01 Renault

Post

January 26th on the cover of F1 Racing Magazine will be the launch date.

User avatar
Forza
272
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 7:55 pm

Re: CaterhamF1 CT-01 Renault

Post

Tom Webb (Caterham F1 Team Head of Communications)
The first Caterham F1 Team car will be unveiled on the cover of the February issue of F1 Racing magazine, out on 26th January.

scarbs
scarbs
387
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 8:47 am
Location: Hertfordshire, UK

Re: CaterhamF1 CT-01 Renault

Post

My insiders tell me they've dropped the blade roll structure and gone for a conventional hoop design instead.

Francesc
Francesc
50
Joined: Sat Jun 20, 2009 8:44 pm

Re: CaterhamF1 CT-01 Renault

Post

Thanks for sharing the info.

I wonder why they did that. Will be interesting to see if Force India keep theirs.

User avatar
Holm86
238
Joined: Wed Feb 10, 2010 2:37 am
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark

Re: CaterhamF1 CT-01 Renault

Post

I guess they found out it wasnt worth it? I dont think it had any advantages after the FIA regulated against the thin blade Mercedes run couple years ago.

ESPImperium
ESPImperium
122
Joined: Sat Apr 05, 2008 11:08 pm
Location: Glasgow, Scotland

Re: CaterhamF1 CT-01 Renault

Post

Could the effect of having the exhausts in a posistion that blow the rear wing have the rear wing generating more downforce for the car that the effect of the blade is now so negligible.

beelsebob
beelsebob
179
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:49 pm
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: CaterhamF1 CT-01 Renault

Post

My Bet is that McLaren/Renault's design for getting 2 airboxes is more efficient than a blade.

User avatar
aleks_ader
88
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 7:40 am

Re: CaterhamF1 CT-01 Renault

Post

beelsebob wrote:My Bet is that McLaren/Renault's design for getting 2 airboxes is more efficient than a blade.
What do you mean?
"And if you no longer go for a gap that exists, you're no longer a racing driver..." Ayrton Senna

User avatar
Byronrhys
0
Joined: Mon Aug 09, 2010 2:14 am

Re: CaterhamF1 CT-01 Renault

Post

beelsebob wrote:My Bet is that McLaren/Renault's design for getting 2 airboxes is more efficient than a blade.
These designs aren't meant to do the same thing though.

beelsebob
beelsebob
179
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:49 pm
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: CaterhamF1 CT-01 Renault

Post

Byronrhys wrote:
beelsebob wrote:My Bet is that McLaren/Renault's design for getting 2 airboxes is more efficient than a blade.
These designs aren't meant to do the same thing though.
Really, they seem to do a very similar job – provide two separate air intakes for separate cooling/oxygenation systems without killing the airflow to the rear wing.

scarbs
scarbs
387
Joined: Wed Oct 08, 2003 8:47 am
Location: Hertfordshire, UK

Re: CaterhamF1 CT-01 Renault

Post

beelsebob wrote:My Bet is that McLaren/Renault's design for getting 2 airboxes is more efficient than a blade.
Their double inlets are not both for the engine. The renault one is for oil cooling. In Macs case, theres three inlets: 1 Airbox, 1 KERS cooling, 1 gearbox cooler.

IIRC I did a blog post on it early last year.

beelsebob
beelsebob
179
Joined: Wed Mar 23, 2011 2:49 pm
Location: Cupertino, California

Re: CaterhamF1 CT-01 Renault

Post

scarbs wrote:
beelsebob wrote:My Bet is that McLaren/Renault's design for getting 2 airboxes is more efficient than a blade.
Their double inlets are not both for the engine. The renault one is for oil cooling. In Macs case, theres three inlets: 1 Airbox, 1 KERS cooling, 1 gearbox cooler.

IIRC I did a blog post on it early last year.
Yeh, I wasn't claiming that McLaren's or Renaults inlets were doing the same thing. I don't remember how Team Lotus's was arranged, but I'm pretty curet the W01's two intakes went to different places too.

User avatar
Forza
272
Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 7:55 pm

Re: CaterhamF1 CT-01 Renault

Post

Mark Smith talks 2012 chassis builds and crash testing

Last week we were predominately finishing off the first chassis. The chassis itself is a two part moulding, but there are lots of smaller parts that get bonded onto it. So even when the two main chassis components are out of the mould and bonded together, there's still quite a way to go in terms of finishing the whole piece – brackets for holding various bits and pieces, for example. Last week was really all about that, and finishing the chassis off to a high standard before sending it off to be painted.

CT01-#1 went into the build shop on Saturday morning and then last weekend two fairly separate things were done. Number one was the fuel cell being fitted into the car, pressure tested and capacity checked. Number two was fitting the front suspension to the car – we don't have all the parts yet, but we've fitted what we can, as well as a number of smaller items around the car.

So that's where we are. We have the engine and gearbox here, and we have fitted them up to check the basic assembly, but then we took them off until Renault and Red Bull come in next week. By fitting them up, we're able to mock up a number of other items around the car – the brake lines for example, and our suppliers can come in and sort that, so as parts come in we'll keep adding them on until fire up next week.

CT01-#2 is also nearing completion. It'll probably go into the race bays on Monday morning and then the mechanics can start working on that car. In the meantime, we can do some smaller jobs – for instance you may have seen the photo of the reflective gold material that gets fitted to the rear of the chassis to deflect heat from the engine – this is something that can be done without compromising what the guys in the composite shop are doing.

Nice! Tell us about the crash tests and homologation. We've passed them, but what does that actually mean?

Over a number of years, there have been significant improvements in the safety-related design of F1 cars, and incidents in the early 90s have really pushed how we collectively regard the requirements from a safety perspective. The tests since then have, quite rightly, become more demanding. We have a number of static tests where the loads are applied to the chassis while it is static, and impact tests where loads are applied dynamically. One of the key impact tests is the frontal impact test – this is where the nose is mounted to the front of the chassis, the chassis is loaded with the required weight and is then fired into a steel wall at a given speed. There's also one without the nose where a plate is mounted to the front of the chassis and fired into an array of six crush tubes. That's really to test other parts of the structure of the chassis, for example the seat back bulkhead with a fuel cell full of water. There's also a rear impact test and a side impact test, so the whole car is tested extremely thoroughly, and that's what's helping us save lives in our sport in the modern era.

In terms of the static tests, the big one is the rear roll hoop test – looking at the structure behind the driver's helmet. There's also a forward roll hoop test, which looks at the section of chassis immediately in front of the cockpit opening. There are also load tests from the side and underneath of the chassis. All the impact structures, front, rear and side, are tested with static push-off loads to ensure they remain in place in the event of an impact. Finally there's an impact test on the steering column, so everything is checked.

When these tests are completed successfully, the chassis is homologated. They are very demanding and there is a huge amount of work that goes into making sure we pass, so that's why we were very happy that they were done and dusted before Christmas. So passing the tests before Christmas is obviously positive, and that presumably means our crash test simulations were all accurate. Does that give you more confidence that the numbers the computers are generating will translate into track performance across other areas of the car's development?

Over time the various simulation tools that teams have access to have increased the level of confidence that when the assembly of the car is made, it will most likely perform as we predict. We do predict them reasonably well, but there's a very fine line between success and failure. For example, if the deceleration can't be above an average of 20G, if you are 20.1G you will fail. We are obviously trying to design structures that are as light as possible – we need to try to create something that passes the tests, but also gives us the performance we require for the car.

What happens to the chassis after the crash tests?

Well, the chassis is still a usable chassis. Obviously if it's damaged then the team can work on the composite structures, which are usually fairly repairable. If you had a disaster, then the chassis would be a write-off. But in this day and age most of the small damage is repairable.

If damage did occur during an impact test – and it didn't happen to us this time – then the repairs would have to be tested again. Once passed, all the future chassis must have the same components as the repaired and passed chassis, so that it is exactly the same spec.

Our car is being revealed in F1 Racing magazine next week... Excited?

Hopefully I'll feel the same as everyone here, as there has been a lot of hard work from everybody in the team to get to this point. I think fully-clothed, so to speak, it looks good. So we're excited and proud to see the car in its final form – fully-assembled, painted and looking ready for launch. I'm sure we'll all be proud to see the car, absolutely, but also slightly apprehensive ahead of the first test, in terms of its outright performance, to see where we are against our competitors.

That first test. It's looming...

It is! We will see.

allstaruk08
allstaruk08
2
Joined: Wed Jan 21, 2009 7:47 pm

Re: CaterhamF1 CT-01 Renault

Post

wow i thought the chassis' were tested to destruction, how agressive are these crash tests if the chassis can be repaired? :shock: