Thanks!
Yes, yes, I have gotten very slow, I know...
I think we have a volunteer to update the website!variante wrote: ↑13 Jul 2020, 18:45Since the official website doesn't help us, here's some situational awarness:
https://i.imgur.com/26Cjr39.png
https://i.imgur.com/IfNUHDa.png
Let me know if i messed up some numbers.
If you think it could be a good idea, as a sponsor, I could swap the supply of the final prize with a few hours per month as a "writer" on the official website (you just need to activate a Wordpress role as "writer"), considering that with shipping books or preparing the STL model for 3D printing, some time has been invested during the last three seasons.LVDH wrote: ↑14 Jul 2020, 19:58Actually, I my plan is a little bit different: I will soon open an account on some GIT service, so hopefully some of you guys, or other interested people, could help with developing the Python scripts, used to check and render the cars and fill up all the tables used on the homepage.
In general, other help is also appreciated. I still dream of something like an MVRC CFD journalist that writes cool articles. But if there are other ideas to help or add other new features for MVRC, any input is very welcome.
Andre and I haven't talked about that for a while... so I think it is more likely that we will keep the current rules for the whole season as it just makes our life much easier,
I agree, that is a wise decision
I think Richard made a wise and obvious conclusion.
You can pay around with the mesh resolution and the number of iterations, or you go away from the idea of a great correlation and just use the fast template to see if new parts make the car better or not and not how much exactly they improve.MaccaRacing wrote: ↑26 Jul 2020, 23:30Hi guys!
I would like to ask you a question about the mantium flow templates. Is there any way to have a better correlation between the MVRC fast template and the normal one? Maybe by playing with settings...
I will make sure to remember to upload as a .zip this time haha