Are there any info if Charles car suffered any damage?
And if it will be repaired so he can start from p4 or just from the pitlane perhaps?
f1316 wrote: ↑06 Jun 2026, 19:27Does anyone have the data on where leclerc was before he put it in the wall? Seemed like he did a better first sector so might have been up?
Very frustrating not to get pole here. Maybe the starts will come to the rescue but it should have been better imho - combination of team, tyres and drivers not maximising. Charles can speak of issues but someone like a Max (or Michael) can be struggling all weekend and still maximise when it matters. I was holding for/expecting a Senna-esque lap from him right at the death but he messed it up and tbh that happens too often if he’s really going to be in Max’s level.


He crashed in S2 so that best sector doesn't really show what he was doing. He was setting purple in S2 before the crash as you can see from the mini-sectors which came after the laps of Verstappen and Antonelli. Ferrari had 2-3 tenths all weekend on everyone there. He would have been in a 33.7 or something like that. It was a pole lap, until it wasn't.avantman wrote: ↑06 Jun 2026, 21:16https://ibb.co/dJ0MQDZNf1316 wrote: ↑06 Jun 2026, 19:27Does anyone have the data on where leclerc was before he put it in the wall? Seemed like he did a better first sector so might have been up?
Very frustrating not to get pole here. Maybe the starts will come to the rescue but it should have been better imho - combination of team, tyres and drivers not maximising. Charles can speak of issues but someone like a Max (or Michael) can be struggling all weekend and still maximise when it matters. I was holding for/expecting a Senna-esque lap from him right at the death but he messed it up and tbh that happens too often if he’s really going to be in Max’s level.
Leclerc sectors time. He did personal best but unlikely close enough to challenge for pole.
https://ibb.co/KpW7JwBS

The dragon's true form is slowly re-emerging?
Lewis explained it pretty good.
I agree - the skill is in threading the needle and the greats do that consistently, with errors the exception, not the rule. Leclerc really needs to change this or he’ll solidify himself as good, not great.
Ferrari looked to have the fastest car there, but certainly not the quickest drivers. It must be very frustrating for Ferrari´s engineers to hand out the best car at Monaco to see drivers of higher caliber snatch pole away from your car....MattLightBlue wrote: ↑06 Jun 2026, 17:47This is the case when you have to try, your home gp when if you start first you essentially win.
It’s not that big deal, much worse to me is the fact that neither Ham nor Lec got the pole.
Mate, how long have you been waiting to hype this guy again? 6 years ?
If we had to like a driver for going full beans regardless of the consequences, I'd put Maldonado among the best. But nobody rates Maldonado high.
Agreed - my only addition is that the real great have a feel for the limit that means they more often than not judge the risk right so they don’t have to “settle” for the safe positions, they maximise the theoretical grip limit. In the late 90’s - when Ferrari’s cars weren’t yet the fastest but were close enough - Michael would do this time and again (the ‘97 and ‘98 cars were not championship challenging calibre cars).edu2703 wrote: ↑07 Jun 2026, 01:38If we had to like a driver for going full beans regardless of the consequences, I'd put Maldonado among the best. But nobody rates Maldonado high.
As I said months ago: A championship-caliber driver has to understand the car's limits and gauge whether the risks of overdrive outweigh the possible outcomes. It's this ability that separates the champion driver from just a good driver.
The "P1 or wall" mentality isn't sustainable when you can't even get P1 driving at 110% of the car. In other words, you're overdriving the car to stay in the same place, only increasing your chances of crashing. This is something Leclerc needs to get into his head before he retires, or he'll be remembered as a Jean Alesi 2.0: The eternal promise.
A safe P3 is always better than crashing trying to get P2. That's the true mentality of a champion.
catent wrote: ↑04 Jun 2026, 18:29I doubt the team that thought-up FTM and halo winglets would miss a seemingly more obvious “legality box” engineering possibility. Monaco is a big race for Leclerc and the team, and they brought a Monaco-specific rear-wing in either 2024 or 2025, if I remember correctly.
When weighing the potential downforce gains from such a design against their power deficit, already high downforce levels, and the FTM, my guess is that any gains would likely be diminishing returns.
https://www.the-race.com/formula-1/merc ... naco-pole/It was certainly a point not lost on Lewis Hamilton, who referenced that Ferrari had potentially missed a trick in not chasing the same exploit.
Asked by The Race about the factors that had gone against the squad, Hamilton said: “Apart from wanting more downforce globally, I think when we arrived on Thursday we saw other people, those guys, with trick additions to their wing.
“We didn’t have that, which was a little bit of a surprise.”