Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

All that has to do with the power train, gearbox, clutch, fuels and lubricants, etc. Generally the mechanical side of Formula One.
User avatar
AR3-GP
624
Joined: 06 Jul 2021, 01:22

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

UserUnknown wrote:
20 Jul 2026, 16:53
That last bit isn't right.

A customer team can dyno test any fuel/lube on the PU to help them find an alternative fuel supply and/or sponsorship. The only condition is that it can't be made by the works fuel supplier. The customer team doesn't need to have an existing partnership/sponsorship with the alternative fuel supplier.

I can't really comment on feasibility of the story, but it doesn't sound as though it would breech any regs.
That is what the "last bit" says.
Cadillac also isn't allowed to test any fuel pertaining to Ferrari PU, because they do not have an alternative fuel supplier.
Shell is not an "alternate" fuel supplier. If Cadillac have an alternate fuel supplier, then Ferrari are compelled by regulations to allow them to use it. In reality no customer team would bother with this in 2026. They don't know better than the factory team. The PU is too complicated.

Back in 2017, Renault and Red Bull used different fuels for the Renault engine. BP in the factory cars and Exxon Mobil in the Red Bull cars. Mclaren had even negotiated to use Petrobras fuels in the Renault engine so that would have made 3 different fuels in the Renault engine before the deal collapsed.
Beware of T-Rex

UserUnknown
UserUnknown
0
Joined: 19 Jul 2026, 23:22

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

AR3-GP wrote:
21 Jul 2026, 02:50
That is what the "last bit" says.
Cadillac also isn't allowed to test any fuel pertaining to Ferrari PU, because they do not have an alternative fuel supplier.
Shell is not an "alternate" fuel supplier. If Cadillac have an alternate fuel supplier, then Ferrari are compelled by regulations to allow them to use it. In reality no customer team would bother with this in 2026. They don't know better than the factory team. The PU is too complicated.
Ah okay that makes perfect sense now, I was arguing based on this comment from the original article, where there’s no mention of Shell making the alternative fuel:
ispano6 wrote:
13 Jul 2026, 01:42
But on the subject of petrol, an interesting background was suggested to us by a source close to the red. At the beginning of the season, it seems that Shell had approved its fuel specification for the Scuderia, just as Cadillac had prepared its own version, following the instructions of the team and the supplier.
Last edited by UserUnknown on 21 Jul 2026, 08:41, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
ispano6
164
Joined: 09 Mar 2017, 23:56
Location: my playseat

Re: Ferrari Power Unit Hardware & Software

Post

The notion that Cadillac is incapable of suggesting a possibly better formulation than the works Ferrari team is the point I contend. Cadillac has it's own fuel development and are in a unique position to be able to make a direct comparison. The previous comments about Cadillac by others just comes off as arrogance. As if they don't know how to dyno and run their own development program.

Cadillac could have found something in their own fuel development and may have tipped Shell to try out their additive or molecular properties. The reports on the fuel alluded to being able to run at higher temps.