2021 Red Bull Racing F1 Team

This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
Post Reply
User avatar
etusch
131
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 23:09
Location: Turkey

Re: 2021 Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Jolle wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 00:27
etusch wrote:
14 Sep 2021, 19:05
LaplacesDemon wrote:
14 Sep 2021, 14:58


Plenums, hydraulics and looms in that area are one of the few remaining PU components that can be replaced without penalty provided they are of identical specification.
I thought Redbull car hit merc's engine cover. But I think there is not damage at engine cover. But if it were damaged it would cause many broken parts went in the cylinder. at least I thought in this way.
These PU’s have an air filter, debris wouldn’t reach the cylinders.
is that filter between inlet and plenum or before plenum ?

User avatar
etusch
131
Joined: 22 Feb 2009, 23:09
Location: Turkey

Re: 2021 Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Villeneuve Slams FIA for Breaking Their Own ‘Consequences’ Rule in Hamilton-Verstappen Crash Verdict

https://www.essentiallysports.com/ville ... oXGPBJph7g

e30ernest
27
Joined: 29 Feb 2012, 08:47

Re: 2021 Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

I don't think Max deserved a penalty here, but this is Jolyon's analysis:



He says it's a close one, but compared to previous incidents there, Verstappen wasn't far enough alongside into the corner making it a bit more his fault (just as the stewards concluded).

User avatar
FW17
165
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2021 Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Which engine was Max using this race, was it slated for more races before the 4th unit being taken?
First thing I was concerned about was the damage to the engine after it landed on the roll hoop.

User avatar
SiLo
130
Joined: 25 Jul 2010, 19:09

Re: 2021 Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Perez absolutely deserved a penalty after not giving the position back.
Felipe Baby!

Alexf1
8
Joined: 28 Jun 2018, 18:52

Re: 2021 Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Jolle wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 00:26
Alexf1 wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 00:09
NL_Fer wrote:
14 Sep 2021, 18:39
I doubt Verstappen can do with just an ICE, probably the TC and MGU-K were hampered to by the sudden loss of cooling.
Hope so, I fear they will change the ES too to the new spec and therefore have to start from the pitlane
I think the PU components are all locked this year, so no new spec allowed. A start from the pitlane is the rule when you change something in parc ferme for another spec (between start from qualifying till after the race start).
ES spec update to improve reliabity has been approved. This is why Perez started from the pitlane in Zandvoort and Gasly from pitlane in Monza.

https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files ... cation.pdf

https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files ... cation.pdf

Jolle
132
Joined: 29 Jan 2014, 22:58
Location: Dordrecht

Re: 2021 Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Alexf1 wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 12:45
Jolle wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 00:26
Alexf1 wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 00:09


Hope so, I fear they will change the ES too to the new spec and therefore have to start from the pitlane
I think the PU components are all locked this year, so no new spec allowed. A start from the pitlane is the rule when you change something in parc ferme for another spec (between start from qualifying till after the race start).
ES spec update to improve reliabity has been approved. This is why Perez started from the pitlane in Zandvoort and Gasly from pitlane in Monza.

https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files ... cation.pdf

https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files ... cation.pdf
Every PU component when it's frozen can have "reliability upgrades". Perez had to start from the pitlane because it was during Parc Ferme

User avatar
Wouter
106
Joined: 16 Dec 2017, 13:02

Re: 2021 Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Jolle wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 12:58
Alexf1 wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 12:45
Jolle wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 00:26


I think the PU components are all locked this year, so no new spec allowed. A start from the pitlane is the rule when you change something in parc ferme for another spec (between start from qualifying till after the race start).
ES spec update to improve reliabity has been approved. This is why Perez started from the pitlane in Zandvoort and Gasly from pitlane in Monza.

https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files ... cation.pdf

https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files ... cation.pdf
Every PU component when it's frozen can have "reliability upgrades".

Perez had to start from the pitlane because it was during Parc Ferme.
That is not correct.
From the FIA documents:

Car 11: ES (new)

The part has been replaced with the approval of the FIA technical delegate following a written request
from the team concerned, this being in accordance with Article 34.2 of the 2021 Formula One
Sporting Regulations.
But as the above part is different from the one originally used and also changes have been made to
the set up of the car (with the approval of the FIA technical delegate following a written request), car
number 11 should now be required to start from the pit lane according to Article 34.8b of the 2021
Formula One Sporting Regulations.

Because he had to start from the pitlane, they changed also the setup. Has nothing to do with Parc Fermé.


Galsy had the same in Monza.

Car 11: ES (new)

The part has been replaced with the approval of the FIA technical delegate following a written request
from the team concerned, this being in accordance with Article 34.2 of the 2021 Formula One
Sporting Regulations.
But as the above part is different from the one originally used and also changes have been made to
the set up of the car (with the approval of the FIA technical delegate following a written request), car
number 11 should now be required to start from the pit lane according to Article 34.8b of the 2021
Formula One Sporting Regulations.
The Power of Dreams!

Alexf1
8
Joined: 28 Jun 2018, 18:52

Re: 2021 Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Can we expect some more Hybrid performance now that the ES is more reliable? I remember Gasly and Perez were geven a new ES during Bahrain weekend. And Tsunoda in Imola.

User avatar
godlameroso
309
Joined: 16 Jan 2010, 21:27
Location: Miami FL

Re: 2021 Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

We'll know for sure in Sochi, although this is reliability, nothing spectacular.
Saishū kōnā

Jolle
132
Joined: 29 Jan 2014, 22:58
Location: Dordrecht

Re: 2021 Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Wouter wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 13:21
Jolle wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 12:58
Alexf1 wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 12:45


ES spec update to improve reliabity has been approved. This is why Perez started from the pitlane in Zandvoort and Gasly from pitlane in Monza.

https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files ... cation.pdf

https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files ... cation.pdf
Every PU component when it's frozen can have "reliability upgrades".

Perez had to start from the pitlane because it was during Parc Ferme.
That is not correct.
From the FIA documents:

Car 11: ES (new)

The part has been replaced with the approval of the FIA technical delegate following a written request
from the team concerned, this being in accordance with Article 34.2 of the 2021 Formula One
Sporting Regulations.
But as the above part is different from the one originally used and also changes have been made to
the set up of the car (with the approval of the FIA technical delegate following a written request), car
number 11 should now be required to start from the pit lane according to Article 34.8b of the 2021
Formula One Sporting Regulations.

Because he had to start from the pitlane, they changed also the setup. Has nothing to do with Parc Fermé.


Galsy had the same in Monza.

Car 11: ES (new)

The part has been replaced with the approval of the FIA technical delegate following a written request
from the team concerned, this being in accordance with Article 34.2 of the 2021 Formula One
Sporting Regulations.
But as the above part is different from the one originally used and also changes have been made to
the set up of the car (with the approval of the FIA technical delegate following a written request), car
number 11 should now be required to start from the pit lane according to Article 34.8b of the 2021
Formula One Sporting Regulations.
Both were changed in Parc Ferme. From the letters:

As the energy store is a different specification and was changed whilst the car was in parc ferme, the competitor is required to start the race from the pit lane per article 34.8 b) of the FIA Formula One Sporting Regulations.

Alexf1
8
Joined: 28 Jun 2018, 18:52

Re: 2021 Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

godlameroso wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 13:39
We'll know for sure in Sochi, although this is reliability, nothing spectacular.
I hope not. Two ES had to be replaced before the first race and a third (and fouth) one was changed before the second race. The ES was breaking down most during the period the Honda PO was at it's best... I hope we see the return of the beast they started the season with.

User avatar
Wouter
106
Joined: 16 Dec 2017, 13:02

Re: 2021 Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Jolle wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 14:07
Wouter wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 13:21
Jolle wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 12:58


Every PU component when it's frozen can have "reliability upgrades".

Perez had to start from the pitlane because it was during Parc Ferme.
That is not correct.
From the FIA documents:

Car 11: ES (new)

The part has been replaced with the approval of the FIA technical delegate following a written request
from the team concerned, this being in accordance with Article 34.2 of the 2021 Formula One
Sporting Regulations.
But as the above part is different from the one originally used and also changes have been made to
the set up of the car (with the approval of the FIA technical delegate following a written request), car
number 11 should now be required to start from the pit lane according to Article 34.8b of the 2021
Formula One Sporting Regulations.

Because he had to start from the pitlane, they changed also the setup. Has nothing to do with Parc Fermé.


Galsy had the same in Monza.

Car 11: ES (new)

The part has been replaced with the approval of the FIA technical delegate following a written request
from the team concerned, this being in accordance with Article 34.2 of the 2021 Formula One
Sporting Regulations.
But as the above part is different from the one originally used and also changes have been made to
the set up of the car (with the approval of the FIA technical delegate following a written request), car
number 11 should now be required to start from the pit lane according to Article 34.8b of the 2021
Formula One Sporting Regulations.
Both were changed in Parc Ferme. From the letters:

As the energy store is a different specification and was changed whilst the car was in parc ferme, the competitor is required to start the race from the pit lane per article 34.8 b) of the FIA Formula One Sporting Regulations.
In which FIA document is that stated?
I can't find what you're posting.
Can you give me the number and description?

Zandvoort, Perez: https://www.fia.com/events/fia-formula- ... nformation

Monza, Gasly: https://www.fia.com/events/fia-formula- ... nformation
The Power of Dreams!

Alexf1
8
Joined: 28 Jun 2018, 18:52

Re: 2021 Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Alexf1 wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 14:41
godlameroso wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 13:39
We'll know for sure in Sochi, although this is reliability, nothing spectacular.
I hope not. Two ES had to be replaced before the first race and a third (and fouth) one was changed before the second race. The ES was breaking down most during the period the Honda PO was at it's best... I hope we see the return of the beast they started the season with.
Maybe Max already has the new spec ES. He was the only Honda driver to receive a new ES at the beginning of the Spa weekend. Can't see anything mentioned about a possible specification change in the FIA "New PU elements document" of Spa. In that same type of doc at the French GP there was also no mention of any new specification of the new PU elements that the Honda drivers took (although AMUS said a new spec TC was introduced) so maybe it's only mentioned by Fia if change of spec is taking place under Parc Fermee. That could mean only Yuki is not on the new spec ES yet, but he already has 3 in his pool so with him the gain is maybe not worth the pain yet.
Do we know if a stronger ERS mode is used by any of the Honda drivers with the new spec ES compared to before? It could explain why Max was behind Merc before summer break and came out ahead after.
Last edited by Alexf1 on 15 Sep 2021, 19:02, edited 5 times in total.

Jolle
132
Joined: 29 Jan 2014, 22:58
Location: Dordrecht

Re: 2021 Red Bull Racing F1 Team

Post

Wouter wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 14:47
Jolle wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 14:07
Wouter wrote:
15 Sep 2021, 13:21


That is not correct.
From the FIA documents:





Because he had to start from the pitlane, they changed also the setup. Has nothing to do with Parc Fermé.


Galsy had the same in Monza.


Both were changed in Parc Ferme. From the letters:

As the energy store is a different specification and was changed whilst the car was in parc ferme, the competitor is required to start the race from the pit lane per article 34.8 b) of the FIA Formula One Sporting Regulations.
In which FIA document is that stated?
I can't find what you're posting.
Can you give me the number and description?

Zandvoort, Perez: https://www.fia.com/events/fia-formula- ... nformation

Monza, Gasly: https://www.fia.com/events/fia-formula- ... nformation
This gets a bit silly.

From doc_50 at the Italian GP, Gasly:
As the energy store is a different specification and was changed whilst the car was in
parc ferme, the competitor is required to start the race from the pit lane per article
34.8 b) of the FIA Formula One Sporting Regulations.

https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files ... cation.pdf

from the dutch GP, Perez in this case:
As the energy store is a different specification and was changed whilst the car was in
parc ferme, the competitor is required to start the race from the pit lane per article
34.8 b) of the FIA Formula One Sporting Regulations.

https://www.fia.com/sites/default/files ... cation.pdf

Post Reply