Gasly and Leclerc may cause trouble. The others are easy pickings.
Sainz can jump Max and slow him up.
Gasly and Leclerc may cause trouble. The others are easy pickings.
Yep, Toto pretty much said the same, and I agree.zibby43 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2021, 05:16Semi-OT, but RB had to tape up their rear wings in Mexico to be compliant/safe.
Was the only thing that screwed Merc the fact that the breakage wasn’t noticed until after the session?
If so, you can see how ridiculous the application of the rules are sometimes. If the wing was intentionally non-compliant? DSQ all day.
Passes the test on 2/3 portions of the wing, indicating a clear malfunction? Should be a chance to fix it, just like they would have been given if noticed earlier.
His car seemed to like the Mediums. I’m guessing they’ll be good again tomorrow with higher temps.Marty_Y wrote: ↑14 Nov 2021, 05:35Yep, Toto pretty much said the same, and I agree.zibby43 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2021, 05:16Semi-OT, but RB had to tape up their rear wings in Mexico to be compliant/safe.
Was the only thing that screwed Merc the fact that the breakage wasn’t noticed until after the session?
If so, you can see how ridiculous the application of the rules are sometimes. If the wing was intentionally non-compliant? DSQ all day.
Passes the test on 2/3 portions of the wing, indicating a clear malfunction? Should be a chance to fix it, just like they would have been given if noticed earlier.
They should have been given the chance to rectify it.
IMO the fault didn't effect the performance significantly enough to warrant a disqualification, but then again I'm a Mercedes fan.
I wonder how Lewis will play his tyre strategy tomorrow, which will be interesting because everyone has free choice.
They've been given the chance to rectify it, as they had the green light to fit another wing before FP2. But as the performance gain for Q was impossible to know, pole could not be acknowledged. What your opinion is, is no more than that and totally irrelevant.Marty_Y wrote: ↑14 Nov 2021, 05:35Yep, Toto pretty much said the same, and I agree.zibby43 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2021, 05:16Semi-OT, but RB had to tape up their rear wings in Mexico to be compliant/safe.
Was the only thing that screwed Merc the fact that the breakage wasn’t noticed until after the session?
If so, you can see how ridiculous the application of the rules are sometimes. If the wing was intentionally non-compliant? DSQ all day.
Passes the test on 2/3 portions of the wing, indicating a clear malfunction? Should be a chance to fix it, just like they would have been given if noticed earlier.
They should have been given the chance to rectify it.
IMO the fault didn't effect the performance significantly enough to warrant a disqualification, but then again I'm a Mercedes fan.
I wonder how Lewis will play his tyre strategy tomorrow, which will be interesting because everyone has free choice.
It’s quite clear to everyone that a discrepancy of 0.2 mm (and that’s just on one side of the wing) does not account for over 4 tenths of a second. It was just unlucky for them that it happened on a sprint weekend and not a normal weekend so that they would have the possibility to rectify it. So, unfortunate, but that’s life sometimes.langedweil wrote: ↑14 Nov 2021, 07:24They've been given the chance to rectify it, as they had the green light to fit another wing before FP2. But as the performance gain for Q was impossible to know, pole could not be acknowledged. What your opinion is, is no more than that and totally irrelevant.Marty_Y wrote: ↑14 Nov 2021, 05:35Yep, Toto pretty much said the same, and I agree.zibby43 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2021, 05:16Semi-OT, but RB had to tape up their rear wings in Mexico to be compliant/safe.
Was the only thing that screwed Merc the fact that the breakage wasn’t noticed until after the session?
If so, you can see how ridiculous the application of the rules are sometimes. If the wing was intentionally non-compliant? DSQ all day.
Passes the test on 2/3 portions of the wing, indicating a clear malfunction? Should be a chance to fix it, just like they would have been given if noticed earlier.
They should have been given the chance to rectify it.
IMO the fault didn't effect the performance significantly enough to warrant a disqualification, but then again I'm a Mercedes fan.
I wonder how Lewis will play his tyre strategy tomorrow, which will be interesting because everyone has free choice.
Things considered: it could have easily been way worse ..
Not in Kelvin though (that would be spicy
If Mercedes are not doing legality checks on these each session I would be amazed. They would need to know how much something will change due to wear after a measurable usage to determine life-span of parts.zibby43 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2021, 05:16Semi-OT, but RB had to tape up their rear wings in Mexico to be compliant/safe.
Was the only thing that screwed Merc the fact that the breakage wasn’t noticed until after the session?
If so, you can see how ridiculous the application of the rules are sometimes. If the wing was intentionally non-compliant? DSQ all day.
Passes the test on 2/3 portions of the wing, indicating a clear malfunction? Should be a chance to fix it, just like they would have been given if noticed earlier.
Nah, making that move on albon was well after any championship threat had gone. Look at yesterday's race. Lewis was as close to cars in that very corner but didn't make an attempt as he didn't risk it.ispano6 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2021, 02:22Same with Lewis, better show Perez some respect. Lewis might be overzealous and may compromise his race like he did to Albon.NathanOlder wrote: ↑13 Nov 2021, 23:36Exactly, Max needs to give Bottas extra room, if he doesn't then thats on Max.Mchamilton wrote: ↑13 Nov 2021, 23:26
Let him be clumsy, shouldnt be giving max an inch in any situation.
I'm guessing they check these things as regularly as other teams. If the 0.2 mm is correct, then clearly this is something that could have happened during that very session. 0.2mm is nothing!! the average human hair is 0.075mm so this 0.2mm is LESS than 3 hairs!Stu wrote: ↑14 Nov 2021, 09:27If Mercedes are not doing legality checks on these each session I would be amazed. They would need to know how much something will change due to wear after a measurable usage to determine life-span of parts.zibby43 wrote: ↑14 Nov 2021, 05:16Semi-OT, but RB had to tape up their rear wings in Mexico to be compliant/safe.
Was the only thing that screwed Merc the fact that the breakage wasn’t noticed until after the session?
If so, you can see how ridiculous the application of the rules are sometimes. If the wing was intentionally non-compliant? DSQ all day.
Passes the test on 2/3 portions of the wing, indicating a clear malfunction? Should be a chance to fix it, just like they would have been given if noticed earlier.
If they are not doing this routinely, they need to look at their systems!!
1995 Spa - Schumacher disqualified for excess wear on the plank, proved to be caused by a sideways moment over a kerb. Result? - disqualification due to a part of the car being outside of the tolerance of the rules.
Or one could say it was fortunate for them it happened in a sprint weekend, because otherwise if it was found out after regular qualifying, Hamilton would have started back of the grid in the real race.Tvetovnato wrote: ↑14 Nov 2021, 07:55It’s quite clear to everyone that a discrepancy of 0.2 mm (and that’s just on one side of the wing) does not account for over 4 tenths of a second. It was just unlucky for them that it happened on a sprint weekend and not a normal weekend so that they would have the possibility to rectify it. So, unfortunate, but that’s life sometimes.langedweil wrote: ↑14 Nov 2021, 07:24They've been given the chance to rectify it, as they had the green light to fit another wing before FP2. But as the performance gain for Q was impossible to know, pole could not be acknowledged. What your opinion is, is no more than that and totally irrelevant.Marty_Y wrote: ↑14 Nov 2021, 05:35
Yep, Toto pretty much said the same, and I agree.
They should have been given the chance to rectify it.
IMO the fault didn't effect the performance significantly enough to warrant a disqualification, but then again I'm a Mercedes fan.
I wonder how Lewis will play his tyre strategy tomorrow, which will be interesting because everyone has free choice.
Things considered: it could have easily been way worse ..