It's worth pointing out that while it's likely, we don't "know" the exact material/combination of material utilised in the track rod... And frankly it's very clearly bent in the photo, which again is unlike Carbon fibre so whether you believe it or not is sort of irrelevant and it would definitely of had an effect on the steering weight/response.. So we can't really shoot any theory down at this point.
Excellent info, the big three auto manufacturers in the states used the Bosch cp4 high pressure pumps in their 1-ton diesels at one point or another and now have class action lawsuits against Bosch for causing all kinds of damage to engines. The lifters in the pump would get turned sideways because of dirt/debris in the fuel and cause excessive wear which in turn would send metal shavings to the injectors. Pump cavitation could cause the same issue (air in a pressurized system will actually cause micro explosions).glenntws wrote: ↑22 Mar 2022, 21:29TNTHead wrote: ↑22 Mar 2022, 18:42Thats indeed interesting. If it is the high pressure fuel pumps I think prior to the failure one should hear differences in the noise of the combustion, because the pump pressure drops etc. Can anyone confirm this? That could support this hypothesis.Hoffman900 wrote: ↑22 Mar 2022, 18:01
That is interesting.
Many don’t realize that the cam driven fuel pumps and oil pumps serve secondary roles as camshaft dampers.
I wonder if it is something deeper routed in the engine causing these harmonics (firing order and the rapid combustion concept).
Nope, you should and probably (if Honda engineers are clever enough to develop such a engine, then well...) would not notice it.
ECUs always (afaik) feature a lookup table for injector rail pressure (no matter if port or direct injection), where through some pretty simple algorithms the fuel injection duration gets increased and decreased depending on the currently existing pressure. The additional time needed during low pressure operation should be negligible, since the default injector throughput should be enough to offer a sufficient window for adaptation.
If, however, the pressure drop gets too strong and the fuel flow is suddenly not enough, the ECU should and (afaik) actually did (onboards sounds like that to me) de-rate the engine so that the pressure can be kept at a minimum acceptable level. If the pump (or it's drive, I would say the first one) is dead, the ECU will sense non-acceptable injector rail pressure and then will stop the engine operation, as doing anything else is literally the same as sitting on top of a dead horse and trying to really motivate it to stand up and move.
While some people said, that Perez electronics died during the spin - which I found very weird, since a dead engine should not result on car shutdown - I think that after everything I read and heard, it's safe to say that the engines are fine. They sounded perfectly well until they stopped. They for sure didn't go out on fuel, nobody - literally nobody - working in F1 in a position to decide on fuel load would do such a miscalculation.
Why the pumps failed.... I don't know. It can be loads of stuff. Maybe the cams on the shaft actuating the pump have to strong of a acceleration or Honda tried to go with a "more lobes, less lift" approach in order to try further stabilizing the fuel rail pressure (which I find very possible regarding their combustion concept) but it doesn't go well with the new pump since they are now not using Bosch anymore.... But it's weird. They should have seen it on the Dyno. Definetly. Maybe RB just f****d up the fuel system up to the PU, since AT didn't suffer such a failure.
And regarding Gaslys failure.... Well, that's just bad stuff from Honda. I hate to see that, they were so reliable last year. But they still have time to make up for that. Probably just too much hardcore weight reduction around the MGU-K. But things like that shouldn't happen to Honda anymore. Get it together guys.
EDIT: If the HP pump was the failure point, and not the internals failed, but the actuator "shaft" and it's spring (meaning: it got up to its failure point where it first didn't return the pump piston back quick enough and then in the worst case scenario broke), we could very well see an actually dead engine because of the debris that potentially had some revs time to cause havoc or straight up chilled the camshaft and the bearings by seizing up the pump actuator. Let's pray, that this is not what happened.
Direct shift into neutral isn't possible I think. Anyways, he probably tried to start it back up again and keep the engine alive somehow.
in english: to put it simple: there was a vacuum in the fuel supply prohibit the engine from getting fuel. i think we can solve this problem already in this weekend.„Um es einfach darzustellen. Ein Vakuum im System der Benzinzufuhr hat dazu geführt, dass der Motor kein Benzin mehr bekam. Ich denke, wir können das Problem schon in Saudi-Arabien am Wochenende lösen.“
Looking at the diagram Scarbs published, there is a 'priming ' pump low in the tank, which should have supply at all times, as there has to be a sample left even after the finish, feeding a distribution pump (pushing to it? ) which then goes to the high pressure pump. As the lowest and mid pump are always 'filled' I have trouble visualising where this Vacuum is being stored?
The fuel really shouldn't have vaporized on the high pressure side because the pressure keeps the fuel in the liquid state. So one would have to conclude that a sufficient amount of fuel vaporized on the low pressure side (at the primer or collector pump). The pump itself can cause the fuel to vaporize by a sort of cavitation effect I would imagine at the pump impeller. Heat soak under the safetycar and almost empty fuel tank likely enabled it. It never occurred in qualifying.Big Tea wrote: ↑23 Mar 2022, 22:06Looking at the diagram Scarbs published, there is a 'priming ' pump low in the tank, which should have supply at all times, as there has to be a sample left even after the finish, feeding a distribution pump (pushing to it? ) which then goes to the high pressure pump. As the lowest and mid pump are always 'filled' I have trouble visualising where this Vacuum is being stored?
What I mean is the primer is gravity fed this could struggle 'sucking,' but there had to be a considerable amount still in the tank as there were at least 3 laps plus the bit for test (tank vented so no vacuum). this pump then 'pushes' fuel to the main pump, so there should be no scavenging problem or air drawn with fuel. from here, I would imagine there would be a sufficient flow to the HP pump, which will be a piston not* screw? and should not produce cavitation.AR3-GP wrote: ↑23 Mar 2022, 22:15The fuel really shouldn't have vaporized on the high pressure side because the pressure keeps the fuel in the liquid state. So one would have to conclude that a sufficient amount of fuel vaporized on the low pressure side (at the primer or collector pump). The pump itself can cause the fuel to vaporize by a sort of cavitation effect I would imagine at the pump impeller. Heat soak under the safetycar and almost empty fuel tank likely enabled it. It never occurred in qualifying.Big Tea wrote: ↑23 Mar 2022, 22:06Looking at the diagram Scarbs published, there is a 'priming ' pump low in the tank, which should have supply at all times, as there has to be a sample left even after the finish, feeding a distribution pump (pushing to it? ) which then goes to the high pressure pump. As the lowest and mid pump are always 'filled' I have trouble visualising where this Vacuum is being stored?