Mercedes W13

A place to discuss the characteristics of the cars in Formula One, both current as well as historical. Laptimes, driver worshipping and team chatter do not belong here.
User avatar
214270
18
Joined: Sat Apr 27, 2019 5:49 pm

Re: Mercedes W13

Post

Still looks slammed; will be interesting keeping an eye on their progress this wkend.
Team ANTI-HYPE. Prove it, then I’ll anoint you.

User avatar
organic
1056
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2022 1:24 am
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: Mercedes W13

Post

AeroDynamic wrote:
Fri Jul 01, 2022 12:03 pm
Looks like the rearward upper wishbone pickup point is higher and closer to the pushrod's which doesn't seem to have moved. Seems like maybe it's not purely aero in this case? Pure speculation - I don't know anything about suspension

PhillipM
PhillipM
386
Joined: Mon May 16, 2011 2:18 pm
Location: Over the road from Boothy...

Re: Mercedes W13

Post

wogx wrote:
Fri Jul 01, 2022 11:50 am
No info about front wing? Those rumours about 5 kg weight reduction were false?
I'd take any rumour about 5kg on a single front wing as false tbfh, it's ludicrous.

User avatar
De Jokke
0
Joined: Mon Mar 30, 2009 1:51 am

Re: Mercedes W13

Post

And again an underwhelming update so far (hope the times prove me wrong), it looks like they aren't even trying to bring performance to the car. All these tiny bits, this car needs some drastic updates (starting with a complete suspension overhaul)!
Last edited by De Jokke on Fri Jul 01, 2022 12:32 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Mercedes AMG + Hamilton => dreamteam!
If you can't beat'em, call Masi!

User avatar
Stu
Moderator
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 9:05 am
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: Mercedes W13

Post

AeroDynamic wrote:
Fri Jul 01, 2022 12:03 pm
It looks as though the pick-up location for the rear of the upper front wishbone has changed (moved forwards and up); push-rod has changed too. Interesting move with the shrouds at the chassis end - making them more bodywork-ish; there must be some benefit, but other than a legality dodge, I’m struggling to see what it is.
Perspective - Understanding that sometimes the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.

User avatar
adrianjordan
24
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 10:34 am
Location: West Yorkshire, England

Re: Mercedes W13

Post

GrizzleBoy wrote:
Fri Jul 01, 2022 12:04 pm
Rear wing tips on these cars are getting sharper and sharper lol.
Given that they will surely generate vortexes if they carry on like this, I wonder whether the FIA will intervene.
Favourite driver: Lando Norris
Favourite team: McLaren

Turned down the chance to meet Vettel at Silverstone in 2007. He was a test driver at the time and I didn't think it was worth queuing!! 🤦🏻‍♂️

User avatar
Stu
Moderator
Joined: Sat Nov 02, 2019 9:05 am
Location: Norfolk, UK

Re: Mercedes W13

Post

organic wrote:
Fri Jul 01, 2022 12:11 pm
AeroDynamic wrote:
Fri Jul 01, 2022 12:03 pm
Looks like the rearward upper wishbone pickup point is higher and closer to the pushrod's which doesn't seem to have moved. Seems like maybe it's not purely aero in this case? Pure speculation - I don't know anything about suspension
Depending on whether there are changes to the lower wishbone pick-ups (or not), I would expect this to reduce anti-dive. If the position change is large this must be a pre-planned swap. Chassis alterations of this magnitude would potentially require a fresh homologation (crash-tests, etc).
Perspective - Understanding that sometimes the truths we cling to depend greatly on our own point of view.

GrizzleBoy
GrizzleBoy
33
Joined: Mon Mar 05, 2012 3:06 am

Re: Mercedes W13

Post

All upper front suspension elemts are all now in line.

So the more forward elements will be creating a gap in the air for the rear elements and therefore reduce drag on that surface of the car.

Basically moving the rearward upper elements out of the way of oncoming air and cleaning up flow between upper and lower elements.

Edit: Upper flap of new front wing is supper skinny.
Last edited by GrizzleBoy on Fri Jul 01, 2022 12:40 pm, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
RZS10
359
Joined: Sat Dec 07, 2013 12:23 am

Re: Mercedes W13

Post

Hasn't extending the bodywork outwards just visually brought them together whilst the actual pickup points probably haven't changed?

Quick and ugly ...
Image

User avatar
organic
1056
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2022 1:24 am
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: Mercedes W13

Post



some pics from Scarbs

mantikos
mantikos
35
Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2011 4:35 pm

Re: Mercedes W13

Post

wogx wrote:
Fri Jul 01, 2022 11:50 am
No info about front wing? Those rumours about 5 kg weight reduction were false?
You don't have to report weight reduction

User avatar
Big Tea
99
Joined: Sun Dec 24, 2017 7:57 pm

Re: Mercedes W13

Post

organic wrote:
Fri Jul 01, 2022 12:56 pm


some pics from Scarbs
Is that stay in compression or tension? Which way would the floor flex? Or is it to stop 'flapping'?
When arguing with a fool, be sure the other person is not doing the same thing.

User avatar
organic
1056
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2022 1:24 am
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: Mercedes W13

Post


Big Tea wrote:
Fri Jul 01, 2022 2:06 pm

Is that stay in compression or tension? Which way would the floor flex? Or is it to stop 'flapping'?
My initial thought was tension to prevent the floor edge bending down to strike the track, so holding it under tension should ameliorate that

User avatar
chrstphrln
7
Joined: Sun Apr 10, 2022 9:27 am
Location: Germany

Re: Mercedes W13

Post

RZS10 wrote:
Fri Jul 01, 2022 12:40 pm
Hasn't extending the bodywork outwards just visually brought them together whilst the actual pickup points probably haven't changed?

Quick and ugly ...
https://i.imgur.com/1udzdiq.png
Thought the same.

User avatar
organic
1056
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2022 1:24 am
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: Mercedes W13

Post

Image

Anyone got a good shot to compare this with? Can just about see the cooling inlet here - supposedly the inlet has changed a bit