This is disturbing.RZS10 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 1:14 amHollus sent me this DM once and i feel entitled to - no, i DEMAND - answers !!!
https://i.imgur.com/KlmP7cj.png
This is disturbing.RZS10 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 1:14 amHollus sent me this DM once and i feel entitled to - no, i DEMAND - answers !!!
https://i.imgur.com/KlmP7cj.png
Wouter I wouldn't worry about it. There was nothing wrong with it or any reason for anyone to overthink it, but alas. What's done is done.
.
Happy to take some education via PM. I am not dogmatic and always happy to learn and amend my world view on key things
Whatever man. I could log out and lurk with an ad blocker and still get 100% of what I want from here. You keep doing you.CMSMJ1 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 14, 2023 7:51 amHappy to take some education via PM. I am not dogmatic and always happy to learn and amend my world view on key things
I have been a mod for a year? Not involved in anything Covid related other than calling out, on a personal basis, the random positions that some people have. However, not in here.
The main point being it is emotive, off topic and the kind of thing to leave at the door. You and I might have a view that cannot ever be reconciled and bashing one another in this place about that isn't really a good look is it?
We have had "toroidal earthers" on here so it is a broad church
That makes no sense?Zynerji wrote: ↑Thu Sep 14, 2023 4:35 pmWhatever man. I could log out and lurk with an ad blocker and still get 100% of what I want from here. You keep doing you.CMSMJ1 wrote: ↑Thu Sep 14, 2023 7:51 amHappy to take some education via PM. I am not dogmatic and always happy to learn and amend my world view on key things
I have been a mod for a year? Not involved in anything Covid related other than calling out, on a personal basis, the random positions that some people have. However, not in here.
The main point being it is emotive, off topic and the kind of thing to leave at the door. You and I might have a view that cannot ever be reconciled and bashing one another in this place about that isn't really a good look is it?
We have had "toroidal earthers" on here so it is a broad church
Er, "missed point error".AR3-GP wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 8:53 pmThis is disturbing.RZS10 wrote: ↑Wed Sep 13, 2023 1:14 amHollus sent me this DM once and i feel entitled to - no, i DEMAND - answers !!!
https://i.imgur.com/KlmP7cj.png
catent wrote: ↑Thu Sep 28, 2023 9:30 amI had a particularly bothersome interaction with a moderator several months ago re: an exchange in a team thread.
Similar to what others have expressed, I received a message stating my post was personal in nature, which I did not think was accurate. Additionally, I was troubled to find that personally charged messages from others participating in the conversation were not edited/removed.
My experience is very similar to what others have echoed in this thread.
It's both unfortunate, and somewhat comforting, that I am not the only one who has experienced seemingly inconsistent, unjust action(s) via a moderator.
The one-sidedness continues...This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
First for everything I guess.
I deleted that post & multiple subsequent posts that expressed outrage at the newborn having an ear stud. The photo itself was not of Checo Perez and the baby, but of the mother & child.chrisc90 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 7:50 pmSince we have the curse of disappearing posts again.....
Can someone enlighten me how it is possible for a team thread to be classed as technical? I mean unless its solely for discussing race pace in the team thread (which would probably be better suited to the actual GP thread) then how on earth can it be purely technical?
Team thread is for discussion the team and the team affairs....however seems it is wrong to point this out in such threads.
RB thread has 2-3 pages of discussing Perez vs Bottas, yet someone posts a photo of Checo with his newborn child and its removed without any valid reason given.
Odd even the sub-forum description describes the threads perfectly.
The one-sidedness continues...This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
.Stu wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 8:58 pm.chrisc90 wrote: ↑Sat Sep 30, 2023 7:50 pmSince we have the curse of disappearing posts again.....
Can someone enlighten me how it is possible for a team thread to be classed as technical? I mean unless its solely for discussing race pace in the team thread (which would probably be better suited to the actual GP thread) then how on earth can it be purely technical?
Team thread is for discussion the team and the team affairs....however seems it is wrong to point this out in such threads.
RB thread has 2-3 pages of discussing Perez vs Bottas, yet someone posts a photo of Checo with his newborn child and its removed without any valid reason given.
Odd even the sub-forum description describes the threads perfectly.
The one-sidedness continues...This forum contains threads to discuss teams themselves. Anything not technical about the cars, including restructuring, performances etc belongs here.
I deleted that post & multiple subsequent posts that expressed outrage at the newborn having an ear stud. The photo itself was not of Checo Perez and the baby, but of the mother & child.
Similar posts were removed last year that centred on Kelly Piquet, it soon descended into misogyny.
It seems that some cannot restrain themselves from the pile-on.
If anywhere the post only belonged in the “all sorts of news about F1” but even that is a push.
I’m not sure where you expect to see an explanation of why the post & the mass of negative posting about it to appear.
I would also consider that it is a stretch for the new member of the Perez family to be related to the Red Bull Racing Team.
The original poster has PM’d about it’s removal and received a similar response.