2024 Chinese GP

For ease of use, there is one thread per grand prix where you can discuss everything during that specific GP weekend. You can find these threads here.
User avatar
PlatinumZealot
551
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

langedweil wrote:
24 Apr 2024, 14:17
PlatinumZealot wrote:
24 Apr 2024, 07:34
I think Norris is quicker than Max he just hasn't got the car to fight and unfortunately McLaren will never deliver him a contender. RedBull is just too evolved compared to Mclaren.
Based on anything ?
Gap to Sainz as a rookie and his development after that.
Last edited by PlatinumZealot on 25 Apr 2024, 02:15, edited 1 time in total.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
551
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

Sieper wrote:
24 Apr 2024, 21:49
There actually is some merit in thinking Lando is quicker than Max. I don’t think so but I do rate him highly. This website (link hereunder) uses a calculation to try and compare real performance of drivers.

In 2022 Lando was actually the best performer;

https://f1-analysis.com/2022/11/22/2022 ... /3/#s-tier

Make of it what you will. A calculation exercise, but to me, it comes quite close almost each year to how my “feeling” of how drivers actually performed is.
Nice post. People think i was just talking out my azz.. But i have an "eye" for who is fast after watching so many seasons of F1.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

User avatar
PlatinumZealot
551
Joined: 12 Jun 2008, 03:45

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

venkyhere wrote:
24 Apr 2024, 17:45
PlatinumZealot wrote:
24 Apr 2024, 07:34
I think Norris is quicker than Max he just hasn't got the car to fight and unfortunately McLaren will never deliver him a contender. RedBull is just too evolved compared to Mclaren.
This man, an 'expert' thought the same too. Eight years ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=yFXO4qyzgDg

I perfectly understand why Hamilton fans can't accept that Max is a generational talent. It's a polarizing sport. It's human nature to talk down the guy who everyone says is better than 'my hero'. We see this all the time - Messi v Ronaldo , Federer v Nadal, Lara v Tendulkar , etc. Understandable. I'm sure Sam Collins too fell prey to this 'my guy, not the other guy' syndrome.
Wait a second though.. How is saying Lando is quicker is a diss to Max? I don't understand that one. And I don't understand how Lewis Hamilton entered the conversation?

Really the tribal behaviour has to stop. It's best to have a discussion about a differing opinion or just ignore the opinion.
🖐️✌️☝️👀👌✍️🐎🏆🙏

User avatar
FW17
168
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

Now that car stopped on track will allowed to rejoin qualifying, I am sure it will be used tactically to benefit teams.

Singapore2008
Singapore2008
2
Joined: 04 Sep 2018, 12:17

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

PlatinumZealot wrote:
25 Apr 2024, 02:19
venkyhere wrote:
24 Apr 2024, 17:45
PlatinumZealot wrote:
24 Apr 2024, 07:34
I think Norris is quicker than Max he just hasn't got the car to fight and unfortunately McLaren will never deliver him a contender. RedBull is just too evolved compared to Mclaren.
This man, an 'expert' thought the same too. Eight years ago.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=yFXO4qyzgDg

I perfectly understand why Hamilton fans can't accept that Max is a generational talent. It's a polarizing sport. It's human nature to talk down the guy who everyone says is better than 'my hero'. We see this all the time - Messi v Ronaldo , Federer v Nadal, Lara v Tendulkar , etc. Understandable. I'm sure Sam Collins too fell prey to this 'my guy, not the other guy' syndrome.
Wait a second though.. How is saying Lando is quicker is a diss to Max? I don't understand that one. And I don't understand how Lewis Hamilton entered the conversation?

Really the tribal behaviour has to stop. It's best to have a discussion about a differing opinion or just ignore the opinion.
If you want it to stop, don't start it. Starting with " I think X is quicker than Y" has never led to a normal discussion here.

dialtone
dialtone
108
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

FW17 wrote:Now that car stopped on track will allowed to rejoin qualifying, I am sure it will be used tactically to benefit teams.
Not only there’s precedent for legality of what happened in China… there’s precedent for illegality of doing it on purpose.

Just_a_fan
Just_a_fan
591
Joined: 31 Jan 2010, 20:37

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

Sieper wrote:
24 Apr 2024, 23:07
Suggest, then I suggest to ad Alonso. I would go a bit further than merely suggesting it. I would firmly advise to do so.
I meant to have him in there already. :oops:
If you are more fortunate than others, build a larger table not a taller fence.

Seanspeed
Seanspeed
5
Joined: 20 Feb 2019, 20:12

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

PlatinumZealot wrote:
25 Apr 2024, 02:12
langedweil wrote:
24 Apr 2024, 14:17
PlatinumZealot wrote:
24 Apr 2024, 07:34
I think Norris is quicker than Max he just hasn't got the car to fight and unfortunately McLaren will never deliver him a contender. RedBull is just too evolved compared to Mclaren.
Based on anything ?
Gap to Sainz as a rookie and his development after that.
Sainz was hardly some veteran, and still outscored Norris even in their second season together.

Max also beat Sainz as a rookie and has undoubtedly developed since then as well, with how incredibly green Max was coming into F1.

So unless you're saying that Max came into F1 at the height of his abilities and only Norris had any great potential to improve, which would be a bizarre argument on its own, I cannot understand your opinion here at all.

User avatar
langedweil
1
Joined: 23 Mar 2018, 20:51
Location: Caribbean

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

PlatinumZealot wrote:
25 Apr 2024, 02:12
langedweil wrote:
24 Apr 2024, 14:17
PlatinumZealot wrote:
24 Apr 2024, 07:34
I think Norris is quicker than Max he just hasn't got the car to fight and unfortunately McLaren will never deliver him a contender. RedBull is just too evolved compared to Mclaren.
Based on anything ?
Gap to Sainz as a rookie and his development after that.
I understand your point, and there might be some validity to it. But then again, there's so many parameters involved.
But I agree Lando is right up there talentwise, hope for him he gets his win finally this year just so that's off of his shoulders, and that McL is chasing the right path to close the difference.
HuggaWugga !

User avatar
langedweil
1
Joined: 23 Mar 2018, 20:51
Location: Caribbean

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

Just_a_fan wrote:
25 Apr 2024, 13:47
Sieper wrote:
24 Apr 2024, 23:07
Suggest, then I suggest to ad Alonso. I would go a bit further than merely suggesting it. I would firmly advise to do so.
I meant to have him in there already. :oops:
He's a talent over multiple generations 😎
HuggaWugga !

User avatar
FW17
168
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

dialtone wrote:
25 Apr 2024, 13:06
FW17 wrote:Now that car stopped on track will allowed to rejoin qualifying, I am sure it will be used tactically to benefit teams.
Not only there’s precedent for legality of what happened in China… there’s precedent for illegality of doing it on purpose.
The difference between the 2 is a front wing

User avatar
chrisc90
37
Joined: 23 Feb 2022, 21:22

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

FW17 wrote:
25 Apr 2024, 15:38
dialtone wrote:
25 Apr 2024, 13:06
FW17 wrote:Now that car stopped on track will allowed to rejoin qualifying, I am sure it will be used tactically to benefit teams.
Not only there’s precedent for legality of what happened in China… there’s precedent for illegality of doing it on purpose.
The difference between the 2 is a front wing
Or doing a tactful spin and the somehow stalling.

Stupid precedence here. Should be 30seconds being stopped on track with wheels/car stationary. If you can’t move in that time or are beached in gravel - your out.

Even teams acknowledged it in an earlier briefing…. And the stewards. ‘How long is too long’

dialtone
dialtone
108
Joined: 25 Feb 2019, 01:31

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

FW17 wrote:
dialtone wrote:
25 Apr 2024, 13:06
FW17 wrote:Now that car stopped on track will allowed to rejoin qualifying, I am sure it will be used tactically to benefit teams.
Not only there’s precedent for legality of what happened in China… there’s precedent for illegality of doing it on purpose.
The difference between the 2 is a front wing
No. The difference is that Sainz had no time and no need to ruin other attempts given he had nothing to defend.

User avatar
FW17
168
Joined: 06 Jan 2010, 10:56

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

dialtone wrote:
25 Apr 2024, 18:03
FW17 wrote:
dialtone wrote:
25 Apr 2024, 13:06

Not only there’s precedent for legality of what happened in China… there’s precedent for illegality of doing it on purpose.
The difference between the 2 is a front wing
No. The difference is that Sainz had no time and no need to ruin other attempts given he had nothing to defend.
Not talking about Sainz, more of this kind

Image

User avatar
Sieper
73
Joined: 14 Mar 2017, 15:19

Re: 2024 Chinese GP

Post

FW17 wrote:
25 Apr 2024, 07:17
Now that car stopped on track will allowed to rejoin qualifying, I am sure it will be used tactically to benefit teams.
This is a good point. It is going to happen.