Yes. And that is not right. Lewis and McLaren did nothing wrong in 2008.
I do understand massa though as he was wronged there. Not per se him, but that whole race. ^&%€ Briatore.
I get that you’re overly sensitive to this topic as a newbie to the forum/Max/RbR fan, and there’s no sense it correcting you from that perspective, but you clearly wrote in the thoughts that you wrongly assumed were there.TFSA wrote: ↑11 Mar 2024, 22:07No it doesn't. I don't want to derail the thread, so I'll just make this one post on this.
The 2008 case is alledging that the FIA and F1 kept secret that they knew of race manipulation, and as such, could have intervened, but chose not to because it would look bad for the sport. In short, it alledges corruption.
2021 was a race director making a bad call. Nothing more, nothing less. But stewards determined it was within the interpretation of the rules, and Mercedes decided - on their own - not to appeal it to the tribunal, which means they've forfeited the right to get it reviewed there by their own decision not to appeal it.
And finally, even if Abu Dhabi was cancelled, Max would still be champion.
And can we now please put this argument about this opening up the doors to have 2021 revoked to make Lewis champion to rest. Those are two entirely different cases. 2021 is not gonna be changed, no matter the outcome of the Massa case. Legally, they are not similar in any way.
It really doesn't.
I hate breaking my own stipulation about my last post and only replying once, but....cheeRS wrote: ↑11 Mar 2024, 23:11I get that you’re overly sensitive to this topic as a newbie to the forum/Max/RbR fan, and there’s no sense it correcting you from that perspective, but you clearly wrote in the thoughts that you wrongly assumed were there.
To be clear, I didn’t say anything about Lewis reclaiming his 8th title after the manipulation. I pointed out that if Massa wins his lawsuit, it ALSO opens up a lawsuit to collect monetary losses. If you read Massa’s lawsuit filing, the monetary compensation is a separate stipulation from his demands that the FIA affirm the facts around crash gate.
So, hopefully you can read the above without assumptions this time.
Well sequel’s in the make
THE STRATEGIST: How Haas cleverly used Magnussen to allow Hulkenberg to snatch the final point in Jeddah.
Libelling a legal director that works in F1 for the governing body, on an F1 themed website.organic wrote: ↑30 Apr 2025, 20:54More importantly, RAO leaked the budget cap investigation outcomes to Mercedes at the end of '22 and in hindsight is likely also the reason mercedes showed up to Canada with a second floor stay ready for free practice. And yet she returns to the sporting body scott-free
Sourced via Rory Mitchell on Bsky
Libel has to do harm to your reputation... If the idea that you leaked the BC stuff comes up in every article about your reappointment the damage is already done and there is no libel. In the UK the statement also has to be provably false to be libel... which may be difficult.Quantum wrote: ↑30 Apr 2025, 21:13Libelling a legal director that works in F1 for the governing body, on an F1 themed website.organic wrote: ↑30 Apr 2025, 20:54More importantly, RAO leaked the budget cap investigation outcomes to Mercedes at the end of '22 and in hindsight is likely also the reason mercedes showed up to Canada with a second floor stay ready for free practice. And yet she returns to the sporting body scott-free![]()
Okay, but do you think it adds up? It doesn't add up to me.
No idea. It's odd. In all likelihood there was and still is ongoing legal cases involving MBS(as FIA head) at present and this may have been one of those that was ongoing and resolved with a phony FIA statement of "reappointment".
I could propose a theory that "adds up". There's probably a relationship...Quantum wrote: ↑30 Apr 2025, 21:56No idea. It's odd. In all likelihood there was and still is ongoing legal cases involving MBS(as FIA head) at present and this may have been one of those that was ongoing and resolved with a phony FIA statement of "reappointment".
As has been the case a few times the last couple of years.
It's just, if you change the results for that race back to what they "should have been" then Hamilton just doesn't have enough points to win.