I don't agree. Ferrari have been going completely different direction with their floor and diffuser ideas to other teams since the beginning of 2022. And until recently it worked wellSevach wrote: ↑04 May 2025, 11:55The tech department definitely feels like it needs a new brain, the team is always chasing trends, doing what others have already done and the results of the copies are often half baked.
Feels like the last time Ferrari brought something that wasn't a copy from a RBR or Mclaren feature was the bathtub in 22.
Your comments are so devoid of substance there’s nothing else to target but the posterChuckjr wrote: ↑04 May 2025, 09:21Weak and baseless nonsense. He is a has been. The end. I predicted this entire thing a year ago and I was dam right. And stop attacking posters Ringo. You of all people should know that. Good grief.ringo wrote: ↑04 May 2025, 08:47Chuck keeps repeating the same nightmare he is having each night, only to wake up and see that it is reality.![]()
Newey will not have done anything special in Ferrari. Watch and see what he does at Aston next year. I wont be surprised if Aston fails.
Get over it and move on Chuck. Ferrari already made back that 400 million, and they're going to make even more money with Hamilton as the season progresses. There will also be a win.
At it is now, Hamilton is driving better. Just about 1.5 tenth off Charles. Steadily improving. By year end they will be about even and have more silverware. 2026 is the championship year, not this one.
let us, what problem for you?
It was more or less the same in the previous reg cycle. The issue is that they can't follow a linear development path year over year. They always --- up.organic wrote: ↑04 May 2025, 12:15I don't agree. Ferrari have been going completely different direction with their floor and diffuser ideas to other teams since the beginning of 2022. And until recently it worked wellSevach wrote: ↑04 May 2025, 11:55The tech department definitely feels like it needs a new brain, the team is always chasing trends, doing what others have already done and the results of the copies are often half baked.
Feels like the last time Ferrari brought something that wasn't a copy from a RBR or Mclaren feature was the bathtub in 22.
They brought the s-duct first, cobra winglets, v-shaped rws that everyone runs now
I would say they have pioneered maybe the most out of all teams in this reg set
could be massive understeer, I felt like I saw few bits come of the front tire right on the lap he went to pit..like on the that curvy stright leading up to under the bridge, not sure if those were his on tire threads or pick ups.
Yeah and we all saw how good this innovations went, we don't have anymore space in the closet for the championship trophies from the last year's.organic wrote: ↑04 May 2025, 12:15I don't agree. Ferrari have been going completely different direction with their floor and diffuser ideas to other teams since the beginning of 2022. And until recently it worked wellSevach wrote: ↑04 May 2025, 11:55The tech department definitely feels like it needs a new brain, the team is always chasing trends, doing what others have already done and the results of the copies are often half baked.
Feels like the last time Ferrari brought something that wasn't a copy from a RBR or Mclaren feature was the bathtub in 22.
They brought the s-duct first, cobra winglets, v-shaped rws that everyone runs now
I would say they have pioneered maybe the most out of all teams in this reg set
I agree. I waited 6 weekends to give a judgement but something doesn’t add up with SF-25. There is a major flaw which prevents them to go full downforce. On top of that, last year slow corners were our strength, while now we cannot figure out a proper setup for riding kerbs and be fast there.venkyhere wrote: ↑04 May 2025, 12:18Guys I think we should stop talking about the drivers and talk about the car. It's clear now there is a fundamental flaw with the SF-25. Whether it was caused by 'we need the driver to sit more rearwards' and the associated gearbox shrinking / packaging architecture changes or whether it was caused by suspension change or floor revision or whatever, the end result was actually sad to see yesterday :
RB21 with its latest floor was approx 0.5s faster in sector1 alone, one major braking event and the rest being medium/medium-fast sections that lasts around 28-29 seconds. 1/2 a second difference there is like 1.75% difference in performance. That's an eternity in F1.
The U.S. trip witnessed the worst Ferrari of the season, rivaling only Saturday in Melbourne. Adjustments made by the engineers shifted the balance more towards the front, showing improvement in fast corners and traction compared to the Sprint Shootout lap. Yet this wasn't enough, with a half-second gap from pole position—potentially seven-tenths if Norris had assembled a clean lap. The SF-25 lacks aerodynamic downforce, with balance deficiencies causing huge losses in slow sections—a well-known issue this weekend in Miami. Raising the car compared to the Sprint caused substantial performance losses: a severe judgment in this car generation, where generating downforce across a broad ride-height range is crucial. Additionally, both drivers pushed to the limit, and the car's potential matched the result. Lewis Hamilton exited in Q2, and Charles Leclerc advanced only thanks to a tow in the final sector worth nearly one-tenth (70 milliseconds). Realistically, Ferrari would have had both drivers close and eliminated in Q2, highlighting a very disappointing qualifying.
Intrinsic problems with this project continue to severely limit Charles Leclerc and Lewis Hamilton, especially the SF-25's inability to exploit peak tire performance. Compared to Sprint Qualifying, the gap increased, and Williams slotted in ahead, pushing Leclerc down further, while Hamilton struggled again with the car's lack of feel. Currently, the SF-25 has a weak rear end: a more "neutral" balance in the Sprint led to understeer, prompting a front-biased approach for the weekend’s second half, resulting in oversteer and total rear grip loss—particularly penalizing the seven-time world champion. Drivers are at their limit, delivering seemingly good laps only to find themselves P8 and half a second behind. Urgent corrections, solutions, and upgrades are required. Until then, barring extraordinary situations like the Sprint Race, Ferrari remains a modest car, aiming at the gap between top teams and midfield, unless miracles occur from the drivers. Red Bull's example shows improvements can happen quickly with sensitive cars, but updates are essential to salvage an otherwise highly insufficient and unacceptable season given the significant Constructors' Championship deficit.
Thank you for the clarification, I didn't realize it was a mistranslation. That makes a lot more sense.
I think Newy is to be blamed more than Ferrari. He did not want to move to Itally and he wanted ownership in an F1 team. Two deal breakers.