Horner is an old relic. He created the spark for Redbull, and the team started to build itself after awhile with Newey's guidance. I would not trust horner to build a modern team from scratch all on his own.
Well naturally. There are Hamilton fans who are Ferrari fans even before Hamilton joined F-1. It's more likely for Ferrari fans to take longer to acclimatize to being Hamilton supporters; after decades of Hamilton as nemesis from his McLaren and Mercedes days.
Gee, I and thought this was F1 Technical.... That's a pretty condescending comment and uncalled for.balex wrote: ↑07 May 2025, 22:22Correct, but it’s orthogonal to the point they were trying to make that Hamilton orchestrated specific design directions via higher-level executives who don’t have any day-to-day involvement with the team, prior to him even being a member of the team.
You need to step up to this level of thinking if you’re going to make a meaningful contribution to this discussion, as difficult as that might be to hear I know.![]()
agreed.. i mean people then cry about how ferrari keep changing leaders as the reason for them not winning chamionship..ScuderiaLeo wrote: ↑09 May 2025, 22:34There is no reason to replace Vasseur. This is why this team can never get their --- together, always replacing the major staff every 2-3 years without giving them time to build up...
Utter insanity. Not only is Horner problematic to say the least with his actions within the team and employees, if you seriously think he was the main catalyst for Red Bull's success(and not Adrian Newey), I dont know what to say.
Huh? I really doubt that. Especially since Hamilton's whole introduction to being a top level pro/antagonist in F1 started during an extremely intense and classic Ferrari vs Mclaren rivalry. The idea of a Ferrari fan cheering for Lewis as he passes Timo Glock for 4th on the last lap to win the 2008 WDC away from Felipe Massa and Ferrari is beyond comprehension.