2026 Regs potential delay - Discussion

Post here all non technical related topics about Formula One. This includes race results, discussions, testing analysis etc. TV coverage and other personal questions should be in Off topic chat.

Will they be delayed?

Yes
7
10%
No
53
74%
They will be scrapped
4
6%
They will be heavily modified
8
11%
 
Total votes: 72

mzso
mzso
67
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2026 Regs potential delay - Discussion

Post

Sevach wrote:
12 Apr 2025, 21:50
mzso wrote:
12 Apr 2025, 21:40
Why would RB be against this engine formula? They only ever designed an engine for this, they literally have nothing else...

The news this year explicitly mention that no changes to the formula are expected for at least some years.
RBR is operating with engines the same way they do with drivers.
They keep Honda engines(even if shared with Aston) and tell Ford deal is off or postponed, redirect their engineers to help Honda.
Why would they do that? They spent a lot of money to develop the engines. Hired several experienced F1 engine designers. As a bonus they got Ford on board as well. And by all accounts the development is going fine.

User avatar
organic
1120
Joined: 08 Jan 2022, 02:24
Location: Cambridge, UK

Re: 2026 Regs potential delay - Discussion

Post

mzso wrote:
12 Apr 2025, 23:04
organic wrote:
12 Apr 2025, 21:42
mzso wrote:
12 Apr 2025, 21:40
Why would RB be against this engine formula? They only ever designed an engine for this, they literally have nothing else...

The news this year explicitly mention that no changes to the formula are expected for at least some years.
Lol RB don't want current rules because they won't be competitive
It's not about the current rules it's about the 2026 rules. He claimed RB is against the 2026 rules and wants it scrapped.
By " current rules " I meant current proposed iteration of 2026 rules since it tends to change depending on the week's whim

mzso
mzso
67
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2026 Regs potential delay - Discussion

Post

organic wrote:
12 Apr 2025, 23:57
mzso wrote:
12 Apr 2025, 23:04
organic wrote:
12 Apr 2025, 21:42


Lol RB don't want current rules because they won't be competitive
It's not about the current rules it's about the 2026 rules. He claimed RB is against the 2026 rules and wants it scrapped.
By " current rules " I meant current proposed iteration of 2026 rules since it tends to change depending on the week's whim
You mean the ones that are pretty much finalized? Even if a bunch of people are making eclectic proposals.

Macklaren
Macklaren
12
Joined: 23 Feb 2014, 16:26

Re: 2026 Regs potential delay - Discussion

Post

Are we going to get 11 black cars next year with colored mirrors? CHANGE THE RULES!

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-t ... /10720824/

mzso
mzso
67
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2026 Regs potential delay - Discussion

Post

Macklaren wrote:
08 May 2025, 14:09
Are we going to get 11 black cars next year with colored mirrors? CHANGE THE RULES!

https://www.motorsport.com/f1/news/f1-t ... /10720824/
I guess they could add a mandatory paintjob rule. Then problem solved.

TeamKoolGreen
TeamKoolGreen
-5
Joined: 22 Feb 2024, 01:49

Re: 2026 Regs potential delay - Discussion

Post

As I said a year ago , the 2026 cars will be heavier than today's cars. Lowering the weight limit doesn't make cars lighter. Especially when you make the batteries bigger.

And yes , there will be 20 black cars. And all 20 will still be heavier than the 2025 cars

User avatar
carisi2k
28
Joined: 15 Oct 2014, 23:26

Re: 2026 Regs potential delay - Discussion

Post

Unless they allow regen on the front wheels they will never be able to regenerate the required power. Better to get rid of the battery and reduce the weight signifcantly.

mzso
mzso
67
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2026 Regs potential delay - Discussion

Post

TeamKoolGreen wrote:
10 May 2025, 22:15
As I said a year ago , the 2026 cars will be heavier than today's cars. Lowering the weight limit doesn't make cars lighter. Especially when you make the batteries bigger.

And yes , there will be 20 black cars. And all 20 will still be heavier than the 2025 cars
You might have said it. It wasn't proven true. And I don't expect it to be come 2026.
I would be surprised if not anyone is below the current limit. If not for anything else performance reasons. Even sacrificing some battery capacity if necessary.
I expect the top teams being closer to the new weight limit at least than the old one.

mzso
mzso
67
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2026 Regs potential delay - Discussion

Post

carisi2k wrote:
11 May 2025, 00:20
Unless they allow regen on the front wheels they will never be able to regenerate the required power. Better to get rid of the battery and reduce the weight signifcantly.
The ICE has power in abundance. It will be a question of opportunity and fuel consumption to scavenge enough energy.

I can imagine them going with much undersized batteries in Monza. Though it would be tricky to introduce an undersized storage units, useful for just a few races.

User avatar
carisi2k
28
Joined: 15 Oct 2014, 23:26

Re: 2026 Regs potential delay - Discussion

Post

mzso wrote:
11 May 2025, 10:56
carisi2k wrote:
11 May 2025, 00:20
Unless they allow regen on the front wheels they will never be able to regenerate the required power. Better to get rid of the battery and reduce the weight signifcantly.
The ICE has power in abundance. It will be a question of opportunity and fuel consumption to scavenge enough energy.

I can imagine them going with much undersized batteries in Monza. Though it would be tricky to introduce an undersized storage units, useful for just a few races.
I suspect the ICE units will be more powerful then what the FIA wants. I know the FIA stipulated 350kw to be 50/50 with the battey but I suspect that most of the engines will have at least 400-450kw and some maybe close to 500kw by Melbourne next year.

TeamKoolGreen
TeamKoolGreen
-5
Joined: 22 Feb 2024, 01:49

Re: 2026 Regs potential delay - Discussion

Post

mzso wrote:
11 May 2025, 10:56
carisi2k wrote:
11 May 2025, 00:20
Unless they allow regen on the front wheels they will never be able to regenerate the required power. Better to get rid of the battery and reduce the weight signifcantly.
The ICE has power in abundance. It will be a question of opportunity and fuel consumption to scavenge enough energy.

I can imagine them going with much undersized batteries in Monza. Though it would be tricky to introduce an undersized storage units, useful for just a few races.
The batteries are basically spec. As the ice is. You can't opt for an inline 4 for certain races either

I hope I'm wrong. And by some miracle these cars with much bigger batteries and power units will somehow weigh less than cars with smaller batteries and power units.

Tommy Cookers
Tommy Cookers
650
Joined: 17 Feb 2012, 16:55

Re: 2026 Regs potential delay - Discussion

Post

TeamKoolGreen wrote:
12 May 2025, 06:49
...And by some miracle these cars with much bigger batteries and power units will somehow weigh less than cars with smaller batteries and power units.
'much bigger' batteries ?

iirc the batteries are only slightly bigger
(and much smaller relative to the 192% increase in electrical power)

mzso
mzso
67
Joined: 05 Apr 2014, 14:52

Re: 2026 Regs potential delay - Discussion

Post

TeamKoolGreen wrote:
12 May 2025, 06:49
mzso wrote:
11 May 2025, 10:56
carisi2k wrote:
11 May 2025, 00:20
Unless they allow regen on the front wheels they will never be able to regenerate the required power. Better to get rid of the battery and reduce the weight signifcantly.
The ICE has power in abundance. It will be a question of opportunity and fuel consumption to scavenge enough energy.

I can imagine them going with much undersized batteries in Monza. Though it would be tricky to introduce an undersized storage units, useful for just a few races.
The batteries are basically spec. As the ice is. You can't opt for an inline 4 for certain races either

I hope I'm wrong. And by some miracle these cars with much bigger batteries and power units will somehow weigh less than cars with smaller batteries and power units.
Not what I remember. There's maximum allowed energy usage and weight limits
I don't remember them moving to the same battery for everyone.

User avatar
bananapeel23
12
Joined: 14 Feb 2023, 22:43
Location: Sweden

Re: 2026 Regs potential delay - Discussion

Post

carisi2k wrote:
11 May 2025, 22:46
mzso wrote:
11 May 2025, 10:56
carisi2k wrote:
11 May 2025, 00:20
Unless they allow regen on the front wheels they will never be able to regenerate the required power. Better to get rid of the battery and reduce the weight signifcantly.
The ICE has power in abundance. It will be a question of opportunity and fuel consumption to scavenge enough energy.

I can imagine them going with much undersized batteries in Monza. Though it would be tricky to introduce an undersized storage units, useful for just a few races.
I suspect the ICE units will be more powerful then what the FIA wants. I know the FIA stipulated 350kw to be 50/50 with the battey but I suspect that most of the engines will have at least 400-450kw and some maybe close to 500kw by Melbourne next year.
How do you expect them to produce an ICE that is significantly MORE effecient than what they have now after the FIA cut out several of the main drivers of the current engine efficiency. To get 500kw out of the 2026 ICE, you would need it to get about 8% more bang out of the fuel than the current ICE does, all while being significantly less complex.

That isn't happening. I would be extremely impressed if they even matched the 2025 ICE for efficiency, let alone massively surpassed it.

User avatar
carisi2k
28
Joined: 15 Oct 2014, 23:26

Re: 2026 Regs potential delay - Discussion

Post

bananapeel23 wrote:
12 May 2025, 11:55
carisi2k wrote:
11 May 2025, 22:46
mzso wrote:
11 May 2025, 10:56

The ICE has power in abundance. It will be a question of opportunity and fuel consumption to scavenge enough energy.

I can imagine them going with much undersized batteries in Monza. Though it would be tricky to introduce an undersized storage units, useful for just a few races.
I suspect the ICE units will be more powerful then what the FIA wants. I know the FIA stipulated 350kw to be 50/50 with the battey but I suspect that most of the engines will have at least 400-450kw and some maybe close to 500kw by Melbourne next year.
How do you expect them to produce an ICE that is significantly MORE effecient than what they have now after the FIA cut out several of the main drivers of the current engine efficiency. To get 500kw out of the 2026 ICE, you would need it to get about 8% more bang out of the fuel than the current ICE does, all while being significantly less complex.

That isn't happening. I would be extremely impressed if they even matched the 2025 ICE for efficiency, let alone massively surpassed it.
The current engines have been frozen for 4 years. Surely the PU manufacturers will find new ways. Kinetic only energy recovery just isn't going to provide enough energy to the battery. The current K was only responsible for 60kw of the current 120kw recovery and it couldn't even provide that on certain circuits so how will the K now regenerate all 350kw of that energy without adding recovery from the front axle. The Gen 2 formula e could only generate 250kw from an electric platform racing on circuits dedicated to maximizing that recovery. Formula 1 doesn't have that with much larger circuits with higher speeds.