AR3-GP wrote: ↑14 May 2025, 18:01
TeamKoolGreen wrote: ↑14 May 2025, 17:21
Farnborough wrote: ↑14 May 2025, 12:35
No it's not. That's lacking in knowledge by the observation.
The disc rotor is primarily cooled by contact of the surrounding air right close to the surfaces both internally (through vent holes in structure) and the friction surface itself.
If that close flow of air is exchanged frequently and to as much capacity as they can generate through there, then its more effective than generally "wafting" air around inside the drum indiscriminately.
I meant the comment somewhat tongue in cheek. The shroud is basically as close as it can be without touching the rotor. This is not an orthodox way of doing it and if you think it is, then it isn't me lacking knowledge.
It is a very interesting observation. We know that there are 3 "shells". The first shell covers the rotor. The second shell is an intermediate layer with the flow diverting vanes (silver, potential high thermal conductivity), and the third is the outer carbon shell. It seems like Mclaren's concept would have much more airflow between the silver basket and the interior most brake rotor shield. As illustrated below:
I wonder if the rotor and shield being so close together influences the pumping action of the brake rotor on the air touching the surface. Kind of like a reverse Tesla turbine. Accelerate the mass of air around the rotor in a circular motion and it will move to the outside of the rotor just like the central cooling holes. I'm no engineer, but it would seem like having more space around the rotor would just create more turbulence inside the shield and rely on ram air to move it.
It could potentially allow for them to use a smaller inlet for cooling the rotor by relying less on the ram air effect, allowing more air to be available for rim cooling.
Fun to speculate about even if I'm most likely way off.