avantman wrote: ↑18 May 2025, 17:04
f1isgood wrote: ↑18 May 2025, 16:59
Yeah but there's still no indication that Norris had enough over-pace to catch and pass Max or something like that.
Of course, just like Suzuka and Jeddah this year and Imola last year.
Point is they should not even be in that position behind, Norris should be leading from lap 1 and drive uncompromised stint for once, so we could see the true pace of that mclaren.
f1isgood wrote: ↑18 May 2025, 16:59
I think Red Bull have made a solid step. It doesn't matter if it's the Max factor winning in the end.
You could've said the same after Jeddah, where Max actually got pole with quite poor lap and genuinely looked a bit faster on both stints. It's track specifics. Mclaren are not faster by the same margins on all race tracks, they haven't been last year and they won't be this year. But they are still unquestionably the fastest car, both over one lap and race distance. If you think that update could cover as much as 8 tenths of deficit we saw in Miami, you are kidding yourself. Stop it now.
I am not saying this upgrade covered the deficit they had in Miami. That would be stupid. What I am saying is when thermal degradation matters less (there are many such tracks), we might be legit competitive or even quickest. So far, there was not one race where you could say Red Bull was the fastest car on track. I think, at least I would be fine with saying that as far as Imola goes.
McLaren will still dominate a few races with their rear cooling engineering masterclass. That doesn't mean we can't win others where they are close.
AR3 pointed out that for the first time this season, Red Bull's theoretical lap times match McLaren's.
In the end, maybe Max drives the McLaren a few tenths quicker but that's irrelevant. We can only go off whatever we see and the data we have. I think it's safe to say Red Bull was the best car today.
Call a spade, a spade.