Staying calm is definitely right. I’m not sure about the low power claim or why Ferrari would go higher than others when they don’t usually (McLaren have been showing their hand more in FP2 compared to others this season) but will await the data to prove me wrong.
A wild Q1 Stroll appears.ScuderiaLeo wrote: ↑23 May 2025, 20:31it means if something goes wrong tomorrow it'll hurt even more
F1tv is pessimistic, they think that both McL and RBR were hiding pace with engine modes. According to their data analysis, Ferrari are 3rd fastest : https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/arti ... P0J1SJ4c8YCRazyLemon wrote: ↑24 May 2025, 08:31Generally when Ferrari can put in constant good times in they're good on Saturdays, when it is the sporadic odd fast lap we struggle on Saturday. Except for the second half of FP1 with Lewis, we've been towards the top with both cars. I can't imagine McLaren hiding too much pace with Piastri trying gard enough to bash a front wing.
Hopefully a good Saturday incoming.
I think fuel would of had a bigger impact than engine if pace was hidden. I never think those F1 graphs are correct but then they had us down the order for Imola Q and they were right so who know. McL haven't seemed to hide pace in the previous races in FP2 but RB always make a huge jump. If we can be P4-P5, I'll be delighted.venkyhere wrote: ↑24 May 2025, 08:39F1tv is pessimistic, they think that both McL and RBR were hiding pace with engine modes. According to their data analysis, Ferrari are 3rd fastest : https://www.formula1.com/en/latest/arti ... P0J1SJ4c8YCRazyLemon wrote: ↑24 May 2025, 08:31Generally when Ferrari can put in constant good times in they're good on Saturdays, when it is the sporadic odd fast lap we struggle on Saturday. Except for the second half of FP1 with Lewis, we've been towards the top with both cars. I can't imagine McLaren hiding too much pace with Piastri trying gard enough to bash a front wing.
Hopefully a good Saturday incoming.