Qualifying was in the rain last year just for your information.McLarenHonda wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025, 12:46Remember how last year he got pole by 0,6 yet ended up stuck P6?![]()
Yeah…where was the “schooling” then?
Qualifying was in the rain last year just for your information.McLarenHonda wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025, 12:46Remember how last year he got pole by 0,6 yet ended up stuck P6?![]()
Yeah…where was the “schooling” then?
And don’t forget Max was on pole at Silverstone but spun round on one of the restarts….McLarenHonda wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025, 12:46Remember how last year he got pole by 0,6 yet ended up stuck P6?![]()
Yeah…where was the “schooling” then?
You are talking about Mclarens and Max. See, you can't even talk about Red Bull cause:Emag wrote:It's always this narrative that McLaren driver have to be sh*t and Max a god.Tvetovnato wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025, 13:49That is not what I am saying at all, but somehow fans of teams/drivers intepret things like that if you don’t agree with their extreme praise of their team or driver. But not everything is black and white. In fact, nothing is when analysing this sport.
It was a good effort by Max as usual, and yes, he is one of few if not the only one who can drive that car that fast. But that is not the point here. The point is that you said that Max was schooling the McLaren drivers because he beat them, and I do not agree. Piastri did exactly what he could, and Norris too. Well within DRS range and around 0,5-6 behind all through the lap almost all laps, even 0,3 at the beginning of the DRS zone and still not passing setup related. Max actually even made a mistake in the bus stop with Piastri right behind, and still there was no pass.
It was a good performance by all of them, and Max came out on top. It can be like that as well.
If Max wins, he is pulling miracles. If Max doesn't win, he is pulling miracles.
If Max finishes the race far from McLaren, the McLaren is a rocketship and RedBull is a boat, but Max is pulling miracles to finish within 30s against that overpowered car.
If Max finishes the race close to McLaren, the McLaren is still a rocketship, but the drivers are so bad they can't get the pace out of it, while Max is pulling miracles to stay within touching distances.
If you remove these preconceptions it's pretty easy to see that the cars have their strengths and weaknesses. McLaren is undoubtedly the best and the most balanced car on the grid, but when things work out for the opposition where they can exploit their strengths to the maximum while minimizing their weaknesses, McLaren can be beaten. It is what happened with this Sprint as well.
Of course you need the driver to drive the car to its limit. Max may be the only driver in the grid who can consistently manage to pull off such a thing. But on a sprint race where Max could afford a mistake and still the following car couldn't even get alongside him in the Kemmel straight, calling it "schooling" and a "miracle drive" is a bit of a stretch ...
He did and bravo to Max for that. He drove to his cars strengths.
People tend to use hyperboles a lot when it comes to their favorite driver.Emag wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025, 14:53That’s RedBull’s problem that they have built a one-man team and cant get anyone in the second seat to get anywhere near what the car allows.
If you think Max is legitemately 1.5 seconds faster than Tsunoda, why isn’t Max driving the Racing Bull? Hadjar is doing better than Tsunoda in the RedBull, and Tsunoda was on par with him before the switch. Max should be able to win the championship in the Racing Bull by this logic.
I am talking about Max in singular because its pretty obvious the other driver is nowhere. You always refer to the lead driver for the team when there’s such a huge performance gap between teammates. Alonso in 2012 is another example. The other driver not being able to exploit the car to the fullest, doesnt mean the car is horrible. It can’t be that bad when the lead driver manages to win races with it.
I dont want to take credit away from the driver when they exploit their package to the fullest, but when some people claim the car is barely 4th fastest is rather laughable. Ferrari is fighting with huge problems with their car, obvious ones at that and haven’t managed a single win so far with arguably the best lineup in 2025. You’re telling me that this RedBull is (overall) worse than Ferrari?
A bit like you with Oscar over in the McLaren thread?Darth-Piekus wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025, 14:59People tend to use hyperboles a lot when it comes to their favorite driver.Emag wrote: ↑26 Jul 2025, 14:53That’s RedBull’s problem that they have built a one-man team and cant get anyone in the second seat to get anywhere near what the car allows.
If you think Max is legitemately 1.5 seconds faster than Tsunoda, why isn’t Max driving the Racing Bull? Hadjar is doing better than Tsunoda in the RedBull, and Tsunoda was on par with him before the switch. Max should be able to win the championship in the Racing Bull by this logic.
I am talking about Max in singular because its pretty obvious the other driver is nowhere. You always refer to the lead driver for the team when there’s such a huge performance gap between teammates. Alonso in 2012 is another example. The other driver not being able to exploit the car to the fullest, doesnt mean the car is horrible. It can’t be that bad when the lead driver manages to win races with it.
I dont want to take credit away from the driver when they exploit their package to the fullest, but when some people claim the car is barely 4th fastest is rather laughable. Ferrari is fighting with huge problems with their car, obvious ones at that and haven’t managed a single win so far with arguably the best lineup in 2025. You’re telling me that this RedBull is (overall) worse than Ferrari?