I'm new as a user to this forum, but I've been reading it for years. It's totally normal to have favorites and drivers that we don't like, I just don't understand the hate that you have for Sainz and why you seem to be so focused on discrediting him. Regarding his performance, since it's clear that you didn't pay attention, here is a summary of some of the problems that have negatively affected his season: Australia: already equal to Alex (faster in Q1 and Q2), in Q3 he tried something different that didn’t work out. Suzuka: only 0.53 behind Alex, three positions penalty, Suzuki’s race: stuck in traffic. Bahrein: ahead, would have ended up with points if not for Yuki's mistake. Miami: faster, in the race he started with very used tires (team’s mistake), damages from the first lap (not his fault), that got worse and worse, VSC in the worst possible moment (he had already pitted and the Ferraris didn’t); Ferrari ended up in front just for that. Imola: way faster, nonsense strategy, VSC at the worst possible moment (AGAIN), when the VSC finished, he was 15th and had to rebuild his entire race. Monaco: in q2 he completely lost grip, same exact problem happened to Alex in q3. Spain: faster, but again, problems in qualifying, a bad lap, put in the worst traffic, prevented him from doing a better job. Race? The car was bad and there was no possibility for him to push because of the engine. Canada: faster but penultimate lap aborted because of the red flag, last lap massive impeding; in the race he couldn’t push and LiCO basically for the entire race because of the engine. Austria: fast; during qualifying lots of problems with the brakes that also damaged the floor (even Sky showed how terrible his car was to drive); race…. Silverstone: ahead in qualy and race, again out of points because Leclerc took him out with him. Here: fast in qualy sprint; during sprint problems with the battery. Race: they found an anomaly and decided to change the car, they completely changed the setup and the wing for a wet race (which would have work if the race would have started at the right time), but at the end FIA postponed the race and he had a car that was undrivable in those conditions. And I did not even talked about the many pitstops where he lost many seconds (like in SPA, a 7 seconds pit-stop...)
Could there not have been technical considerations? I suspect the Mercedes engine will be much better than the Audi engine in 2026.
No offence but some of the reasons for Sainz's apparent misfortune can't be passed as an excuse. I notice you didn't mention Shanghai either?StopInventing wrote: ↑28 Jul 2025, 15:07I'm new as a user to this forum, but I've been reading it for years. It's totally normal to have favorites and drivers that we don't like, I just don't understand the hate that you have for Sainz and why you seem to be so focused on discrediting him. Regarding his performance, since it's clear that you didn't pay attention, here is a summary of some of the problems that have negatively affected his season: Australia: already equal to Alex (faster in Q1 and Q2), in Q3 he tried something different that didn’t work out. Suzuka: only 0.53 behind Alex, three positions penalty, Suzuki’s race: stuck in traffic. Bahrein: ahead, would have ended up with points if not for Yuki's mistake. Miami: faster, in the race he started with very used tires (team’s mistake), damages from the first lap (not his fault), that got worse and worse, VSC in the worst possible moment (he had already pitted and the Ferraris didn’t); Ferrari ended up in front just for that. Imola: way faster, nonsense strategy, VSC at the worst possible moment (AGAIN), when the VSC finished, he was 15th and had to rebuild his entire race. Monaco: in q2 he completely lost grip, same exact problem happened to Alex in q3. Spain: faster, but again, problems in qualifying, a bad lap, put in the worst traffic, prevented him from doing a better job. Race? The car was bad and there was no possibility for him to push because of the engine. Canada: faster but penultimate lap aborted because of the red flag, last lap massive impeding; in the race he couldn’t push and LiCO basically for the entire race because of the engine. Austria: fast; during qualifying lots of problems with the brakes that also damaged the floor (even Sky showed how terrible his car was to drive); race…. Silverstone: ahead in qualy and race, again out of points because Leclerc took him out with him. Here: fast in qualy sprint; during sprint problems with the battery. Race: they found an anomaly and decided to change the car, they completely changed the setup and the wing for a wet race (which would have work if the race would have started at the right time), but at the end FIA postponed the race and he had a car that was undrivable in those conditions. And I did not even talked about the many pitstops where he lost many seconds (like in SPA, a 7 seconds pit-stop...)
Sainz’s season for now is just not judgeable for all the external circumstances that have negatively affected his weekends. He problably lost more than 30 points (not because of him).
Instead, regarding your assumption with no proof that he "ran away from Hulk", Audi has already communicated that they are behind with the 2026 project. Audi will probably take years to be competitive. Meanwhile, Williams seems to be the team that could make a step forward (considering that Mercedes's engine could be pretty good). Sainz decided to go with the team that could have the best chance of being competitive in a short time, which is Williams. And again "SAI ran away from HUL".. This just doesn't have any logic. He is the driver that currently hade the toughest teammates. The only season where he was a little bit lost was that year in Renault (but there were also many external circumstances) and anyway, that was in 2018, many years ago. If he is so afraid of strong teammates, then why did he accept Ferrari's offer? Why did he not stay at McLaren where he was better than Norris? Why did he want to extend his contract with Ferrari? Why did he not accept Audi's offers (the paycheck would have been huge) since Sainz was Audi's primary target.
Could you please tell me what, according to you, cannot be passed as an excuse?DJ Downforce wrote: ↑30 Jul 2025, 01:56No offence but some of the reasons for Sainz's apparent misfortune can't be passed as an excuse. I notice you didn't mention Shanghai either?StopInventing wrote: ↑28 Jul 2025, 15:07I'm new as a user to this forum, but I've been reading it for years. It's totally normal to have favorites and drivers that we don't like, I just don't understand the hate that you have for Sainz and why you seem to be so focused on discrediting him. Regarding his performance, since it's clear that you didn't pay attention, here is a summary of some of the problems that have negatively affected his season: Australia: already equal to Alex (faster in Q1 and Q2), in Q3 he tried something different that didn’t work out. Suzuka: only 0.53 behind Alex, three positions penalty, Suzuki’s race: stuck in traffic. Bahrein: ahead, would have ended up with points if not for Yuki's mistake. Miami: faster, in the race he started with very used tires (team’s mistake), damages from the first lap (not his fault), that got worse and worse, VSC in the worst possible moment (he had already pitted and the Ferraris didn’t); Ferrari ended up in front just for that. Imola: way faster, nonsense strategy, VSC at the worst possible moment (AGAIN), when the VSC finished, he was 15th and had to rebuild his entire race. Monaco: in q2 he completely lost grip, same exact problem happened to Alex in q3. Spain: faster, but again, problems in qualifying, a bad lap, put in the worst traffic, prevented him from doing a better job. Race? The car was bad and there was no possibility for him to push because of the engine. Canada: faster but penultimate lap aborted because of the red flag, last lap massive impeding; in the race he couldn’t push and LiCO basically for the entire race because of the engine. Austria: fast; during qualifying lots of problems with the brakes that also damaged the floor (even Sky showed how terrible his car was to drive); race…. Silverstone: ahead in qualy and race, again out of points because Leclerc took him out with him. Here: fast in qualy sprint; during sprint problems with the battery. Race: they found an anomaly and decided to change the car, they completely changed the setup and the wing for a wet race (which would have work if the race would have started at the right time), but at the end FIA postponed the race and he had a car that was undrivable in those conditions. And I did not even talked about the many pitstops where he lost many seconds (like in SPA, a 7 seconds pit-stop...)
Sainz’s season for now is just not judgeable for all the external circumstances that have negatively affected his weekends. He problably lost more than 30 points (not because of him).
Instead, regarding your assumption with no proof that he "ran away from Hulk", Audi has already communicated that they are behind with the 2026 project. Audi will probably take years to be competitive. Meanwhile, Williams seems to be the team that could make a step forward (considering that Mercedes's engine could be pretty good). Sainz decided to go with the team that could have the best chance of being competitive in a short time, which is Williams. And again "SAI ran away from HUL".. This just doesn't have any logic. He is the driver that currently hade the toughest teammates. The only season where he was a little bit lost was that year in Renault (but there were also many external circumstances) and anyway, that was in 2018, many years ago. If he is so afraid of strong teammates, then why did he accept Ferrari's offer? Why did he not stay at McLaren where he was better than Norris? Why did he want to extend his contract with Ferrari? Why did he not accept Audi's offers (the paycheck would have been huge) since Sainz was Audi's primary target.