flynfrog wrote:the budget cap would have made toyota win a race in the last 5 years?

Nope, but it would have stopped them from wasting
BILLIONS in what was a lost cause. If their Budget was $50mil rather than the hundreds of Million they spent year on year I doubt they would be as concerned.
timbo wrote:ISLAMATRON wrote:Everyone still think the budget cap was a bad idea? The only bad thing about the budget cap was that it wasnt instituted at least 3 years ago.
Budget cup is only a good idea when you can guaranty adequate income. Even if cap was $10 mil, it could be $10 mil too much. And the only way to
guaranty income is to get more prize money to the teams, because in the hard times there naturally would be less sponsor interest (even leaving devalued brand aside). I haven't seen ANY moves from MrM side in that direction, he always covered MrE's ass.
I want to ask once again - what Concorde is worth? What is that "3-year committed" thing if Toyota may just leave? My guess it is that teams have to pay three year invoice up-front so MrM get all the money at once

And when have they not had guaranteed income? The concorde agreement guarntees the teams a certain percentage since the FISA/FOCA wars... the teams could have got more money easily from Bernie had Ferrari not sold out the GPMA. And really the FOM money the teams have been recieving from BE is nothing compared to what they have been spending the last 10 years or so.
If you were paying attention you would have realized that it was the teams who signed the lastest concorde agreement and not the manufacters, so if the Manufacterer parent company wanted to leave the sport all they had to do was merely sell the team, many of us mentioned this the first moments after any details of the newest concorde were released.